Skip to main content

Multiple Analyses and Multiple Treatment Arms

  • Chapter
  • 815 Accesses

Part of the book series: Statistics for Biology and Health ((SBH))

Abstract

This chapter elaborates upon the ability of investigators to draw confirmatory conclusions from a clinical trial that consists of a control group and multiple treatment arms. After a review of the literature, a combination of the differential apportionment of the type I error rates and the use of dependent hypothesis testing will be applied to the multiple testing issue that naturally arises from the multiple treatment arm scenario. No new mathematical tools are developed, and several examples of clinical trials under design are provided to demonstrate the applicability of the procedures that we have developed in this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dowdy, S., Wearden, S. (1991). Statistics for Research. 2 nd Ed. New York, John Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Tukey, J.W. (1953). The problem of multiple comparsions. Department of Mathematics, Princeton University (manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Woolson, R.F. (1987). Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Biomedical Data. New York. John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunnett, C.W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 50:1096–1121.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunnett, C.W. (1964). New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20:482–491.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York. McGraw Hill. pp.201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, B.R. Cutler, J.A., Gordon, D.J., Furberg, C.D., Wright, J.T., Cushman, W.C., Grimm, R.H., LaRosa, J., Whelton, P.K., Perry, H.M., Alderman, M.H., Ford, C.E., Oparil, S. Francis, C., Proschan, M., Pressel, S., Black, H.R., and Hawkins, C.M. for the ALLHAT Research Group (1996), Rationale and Design for the Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). American Journal of Hypertension 9:342–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung, S.H., Holland, B. (1991). Extension of Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure to the case of several groups. Biometrics 47:21–32.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ping-Yu, Dahlberg, S. (1995). Design and analysis of multiarm clinical trials with survival endpoints. Controlled Clinical Trials 16:119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laska, E.M., Tang, K.I., Meisner, M.J. (1992). Testing hypotheses about an identified treatment when there are multiple endpoints 87:825–831.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger, V. (2000). Pros and cons of permutation tests. Statistics in Medicine. 19:1319–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger, V.W., Lunneborg, C., Ernst, M.D., Levine, J.G. (2002). Parametric analyses in randomized clinical trials. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 1:74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fung, K.Y., Tam, H. (1988). Robust confidence intervals for comparing seveal treatment groups to a control group. Statistician 37:378–399.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cheung, S.H., Chan, W.S. (1996). Simultaneous confidence intervals for pairwise multiple comparisons in a two-way unbalanced design. Biometrics 52:463–472.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Thall, P.F., Simon, R., Ellenberg, S.S. (1989). A two-stage design for choosing among several experimental treatments and a control in clinical trials. Biometrics. 45:537–547.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mukerjee, H., Robertson, T., Wright, F.T. (1987). Comparison of several treatment with a control using multiple contrasts Journal of the American Statistical Association 82:902–910.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams, D.A. (1971). A test for differences between treamtnet measns when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose level. Biometrics. 27:103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ruberg, S.J. (1989). Contrasts for identifying the minimum effective dose. Journal of the American Statistical Assocation 84:816–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamhane A.C., Hochberg Y., Dunnett, C.W. (1996). Multiple test procedures for dose finding. Biometrics 52:21–37.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Follmann, D.A., Proschan, M.A., Geller, N.L. (1994). Monitoring pairwise comparisons in multi-armed clinical trials. Biometrics 50:325–336.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Pratt, C.M., Mahmarian, J.J., Borales-Ballejo, H., Casareto, R., Moyé, L.A. for the Transdermal Nitrogen Investigators Group (1998). Design of a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial on the long-term effects of intermittent transdermal nitroglycerin on left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology 81:719–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2003). Multiple Analyses and Multiple Treatment Arms. In: Multiple Analyses in Clinical Trials. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21813-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21813-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-00727-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21813-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics