Skip to main content
  • 231 Accesses

Summary

Immediate breast reconstruction is more convenient for patients, less expensive, less risky, less distressing, and achieves better aesthetic results than delayed reconstruction. Immediate reconstruction can be combined with a skin-sparing mastectomy to achieve the best possible aesthetic outcome without any significantly increased risk of tumor recurrence. For the general surgeon, performing a skin-sparing mastectomy is more difficult than performing a conventional wide-field mastectomy. The way the mastectomy is performed affects the quality of the breast reconstruction result, and the general surgeon who performs a skin-sparing mastectomy is therefore an important member of the reconstructive team. Skin-sparing mastectomy also facilitates the performance of bilateral TRAM flap reconstruction, especially in thin patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Noone RB, Murphy JB, Spear SL, Little JW. A 6-year experience with immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:258–269.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Noone RB, Frazier TG, Hayward CZ. Patient acceptance of immediate reconstruction following mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:632–640.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grotting JC. Immediate breast reconstruction using the free TRAM flap. Clin Plast Surg. 1994;21:207–221.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elkowitz A, Colen S, Slavin S, Seibert J, Weinstein M, Shaw W. Various methods of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: an economic comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:77–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilboa D, Borenstein A, Floro S, Shafir R, Falach H, Tsur H. Emotional and psychological adjustment of women to breast reconstruction and detection of subgroups at risk for psychological morbidity. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;25:397–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schover LR. The impact of breast cancer on sexuality, body image, and intimate relationships. CA Cancer J Clin. 1991;41:112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lasry JM, Margolese RG, Poisson R, et al. Depression and body image following mastectomy and lumpectomy. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:529–534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroll SS, Coffey JA Jr, Winn RJ, Schusterman MA. A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:860–864.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Weldon ME. Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:255–262.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Miller MJ, et al. The free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction: a single center’s experience with 211 consecutive cases. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:234–242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, Vasconez LO. Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83:842–844.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Bried JT, Mackay G. The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1153–1160.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carlson GW, Bostwock J, Styblo TM, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg. 1997;225:570–578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kroll SS, Ames F, Singletary SE, Schusterman MA. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172:17–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK. Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient: a critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg. 1987;205:508–518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kroll SS, Netscher DT. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;86:886–892.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holmstrom H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. ScandJ Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;13:423.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McGraw JB, Papp C, Edwards A, McMellin A. The autogenous latissimus breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 1994;21:279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Tadjalli HE, Singletary SE, Ames FC. Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:193–197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kroll SS, Miller MJ, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Singletary SE, Ames F. The rationale for elective contralateral mastectomy with immediate bilateral reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994;1:457–461.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2000). Immediate Breast Reconstruction. In: Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Tissue. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21767-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21767-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98670-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21767-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics