Skip to main content

Shaping the Breast Mound in Delayed Reconstruction

  • Chapter
Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Tissue
  • 230 Accesses

Summary

Delayed breast reconstruction is more difficult than immediate reconstruction and requires more tissue, effort, and artistic judgment to achieve aesthetically good results. Because the inframammary fold and skin envelope have not been preserved, they must be reconstructed. The inferior breast panel can be created using the TRAM flap itself or the original mastectomy flap of native breast skin. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. The choice of approach depends on the defect, the type of flap being used, and the surgeon’s judgment. If the inferior mastectomy flap is used to cover the lower pole of the breast, release of all scar tissue is essential to allow the remaining breast skin to reexpand to its original dimensions. If this is not possible, a releasing incision in the inferior mastectomy flap will often allow adequate expansion of the inferior pole.

Having a logical, step-by-step plan makes shaping the breast easier and faster, and leads to more consistent results. Nevertheless, each patient is unique, so the surgeon must be ready to modify the plan when necessary to attain the best possible results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Styblo TM, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg. 1997;225:570–578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlson GW. Skin sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. AmerSurg. 1996;62:151–155.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kroll SS, Coffey JA Jr, Winn RJ, Schusterman MA. A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:860–864.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larson DL, Lindberg R, Lane E. Major complications of radiotherapy in cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx: a 10-year study. AmJSurg. 1983;146:531–536.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Salmi A, Tukianinen E, Harma M, Asko-Seljavaara S. A prospective study of changes in muscle dimensions following free-muscle transfer measured by ultrasound and CT scanning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:1443–1450.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maxwell GP, Andochick SE. Secondary shaping of the TRAM flap. Clin Plast Surg. 1994;21:247–253.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2000). Shaping the Breast Mound in Delayed Reconstruction. In: Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Tissue. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21767-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21767-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98670-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21767-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics