Skip to main content

Spinosad Toxicity to Pollinators and Associated Risk

  • Chapter
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Part of the book series: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology ((RECT,volume 179))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldershof S (1999a) Determination of the acute contact LD50 of spinosad (formulated as the 480 G/LSC, NAF-85) for the bumble bee Bombus terrestris L. Report GHE-P-7875. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldershof S (1999b) Determination of the acute oral LD50 of spinosad (formulated as the 480 G/LSC, NAF-85) for the bumble bee Bombus terrestris L. Report GHE-P-7874. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldershof S (2000) Effect of spinosad (formulated as 480 g/L SC, NAF-85) on the bumble bee Bombus terrestris determined under greenhouse conditions. Report GHE-P-8398. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett KL, Grandy N, Harrison EG, Hassan SA, Oomen PA (eds) (1994) Guidance document on regulatory testing procedures for pesticides with no-target arthropods. Proceeding from ESCORT workshop, Wageningen, the Netherlands March 28–30, 1994. SETAC Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin WJ, Marty, MS, Vedula U, Liberacki AB, Yano BL (2000) Developmental toxicity of spinosad administered by gavage to CD® rats and New Zealand white rabbits. Food Chem Toxicol 38:1103–1112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burns RE, Harris DL, Moreno DS, Eger JE (2001) Efficacy of spinosad bait sprays to control Mediterranean and Caribbean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in commercial citrus in Florida. Fla Entomol 84:672–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CB, Mayes MA, Cryer SA (2001) An ecological risk assessment for spinosad use on cotton. Pest Manag Sci 58:70–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CB, Bormett GA, Saunders DG, Powers FL, McGibbon AS, Reeves GL, Rutherford L, Balcer JL (2002) Environmental fate of spinosad. 1. Dissipation and degradation in aqueous systems. J Agric Food Chem 50:3244–3256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouse GD, Sparks TC (1998) Naturally derived materials as products and leads for insect control: the spinosyns. Rev Toxicol 2:133–146.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeAmicis CV, Dripps JE, Hatton CJ, Karr LL (1997) Physical and biological properties of the spinosyns: novel macrolide pest-control agents from fermentation. In: Hedin PA, Hollingworth RM, Masler EP, Miyamoto J, Thompson DG (eds) Phytochemicals for pest control. Symposium Series 658. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) (1992) Guideline on test methods for evaluating the side-effects of plant protection products for honey bees, no. 170. EPPO Bull 22:203–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forey D (1999) Evaluation of Success 2SC (NAF-315) on honey bees. Report 116–99. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin RM, Haine HM (1998) Effect of applying spinosad to staminate kiwifruit flowers on the survival of foraging honey bees. Report GHF-R-445. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahne R (2000) GF-120 (spinosad fruit fly bait): acute contact toxicity test with the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Report 000110. Dow Chemical, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsall N (2001) A semi-field test to evaluate the effects of multiple applications of spinosad 480 SC (NAF-85), a suspension concentrate formulation containing 480 g/L DE-105, on the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) (2001). Report EA01T6P024. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsall N, Gray AP (1998a) Spinosad technical acute toxicity to honey bees (Apis mellifera). Report GHE-T-849. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsall N, Gray AP (1998b) NAF-85 (480 g/L SC of Spinosad): acute toxicity to honey bees. Report GHE-T-850. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoxter KA, Benard WL, Smith GJ (1992) XDE-105 Insecticide: An acute contact toxicity study with the honey bee. Report DECO-ES-2551. Dow Chemical, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen CA, Mayer DF (1990) Pollinator protection: a bee and pesticide handbook. Wicwas Press, Cheshire, CN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshi K (2000a) Toxicity and side effects of spinosad to bumblebees, Bombus terrestris, in lab and greenhouse conditions. Report GHF-P-2265. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshi K (2000b) Toxicity and side effects of spinosad to honey bees, Apis mellifera, in lab and greenhouse conditions. Report GHF-P-2264. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland RL (1999) Evaluation of Success 2 SC on honey bees. Report 219–99. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirst HA, Michel KH, Mynderse JS, Chio EH, Yao RC, Nakatsukasa WM, Boeck LD, Occlowitz JL, Paschal JW, Deeter JB, Thompson GD (1992) Discovery, isolation, and structure elucidation of a family of structurally unique, fermentation-derived tetracyclic macrolides. In: Baker DR, Fenyes JG, Steffans JJ (eds) Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals, 3rd Ed. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 214–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranzfelder JA (1999) Spinosad (NAF-315): a foliage residue toxicity study with the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Report 990123. Dow Chemical, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer DF (1999) Honey bee field investigation of mitigation methods for the use of Success on alfalfa. Report WSU# 99-003. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer DF, Kovacs G, Brett BL, Bisabri BL (2001) The effects of spinosad insecticide to adults of Apis mellifera, Megachile rotundata and Nomia melanderi (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Int J Hortic Sci 7:93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertz FP, Yao RC (1990) Saccharopolyspora spinosa sp. nov. isolated from soil collected in a sugar mill rum still. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40:34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer SJ, Krueger HO (1997) NAF-315: a foliage residue toxicity study with the honey bee. Report 103-420. Dow Chemical, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perina VCF (1996) Acute contact toxicity of Tracer to honey bee (Apis mellifera mellifers L.). Report D.4.25/96. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesticide Safety Directorate (1996) Label phrases regarding the risk to honey bees. PSD, United Kingdom. [www.pesticides.gov.uk]

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves GL, Hale KA, Portwood DE (1996) The aerobic and anaerobic degradation of spinosad—a novel natural insect control agent. In: Del Re AAM (ed) Environmental fate of xenobiotics. Goliardica Pavese, Pavia, Italy, pp 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado VL (1998) Studies on the mode of action of spinosad: insect symptoms and physiological correlates. Pestic Biochem Physiol 60:91–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado VL, Watson GB, Sheets JL (1997) Studies on the mode of action of spinosad, the active ingredient in Tracer insect control. Proc Beltwide Cotton Conf 2:1082–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado VL, Sheets JJ, Watson GB, Schmidt AL (1998) Studies on the mode of action of spinosad: the internal effective concentration and the concentration dependence of neural excitation. Pestic Biochem Physiol 60:103–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DG, Bret BL (1997) Fate of spinosad in the environment. Down to Earth 52: 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks TC, Thompson GD, Kirst HA, Hertlein MB, Larson LL, Worden TV, Thibault ST (1998) Biological activity of the spinosyns, new fermentation derived insect control agents, on tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. J Econ Entomol 91:1277–1283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins KE, Bond DM, Novilla MN, Reasor MJ (2002) Spinosad Insecticide: subchronic and chronic toxicity and lack of carcinogenicity in CD-1 mice. Toxicol Sci 65:276–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MA, Goodwin RM (2000) The effect of Success Naturalyte on honey bee (Apis mellifera) brood when applied as a single application to avocado trees in full bloom. Report GFH-R-576. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson GD, Hutchins S (1999) Bioinsecticides: spinosad. Pestic Outlook 10:78–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins AR, Holland PT, Thomson C, Wilson DJ, Malcolm CP (1999) Residual life of spinosad on kiwifruit—biological and chemical studies. Proc NZ Plant Protect Conf 52:94–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1982) Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, FIFRA Subdivision L, Hazard Evaluation: Non-Target Insects, Subsection 141-1. Office of Pesticide Programs. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1996) Label Review Manual. EPA 737-B-96-001. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2000) Pesticides: draft guidance for pesticide registrants on bee precautionary labeling. Fed Reg 65:2261 (November 22, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinall S (2000) A semi-field test to evaluate the effects of Spinosad 480 SC (NAF-85), a suspension concentrate formulation containing 480 g/L DE-105, on the honey bee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Report GHE-P-7111. Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson GB (2001) Actions of insecticidal spinosyns on γ-aminobutyric acid responses from small-diameter cockroach neurons. Pestic Biochem Physiol 71:20–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yano BL, Bond DM, Novilla LG, McFadden LG, Reasor MJ (2002) Spinosad insecticide: subchronic and chronic toxicity and lack of carcinogenicity in Fischer 344 rats. Toxicol Sci 65:288–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by George W. Ware.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayes, M.A., Thompson, G.D., Husband, B., Miles, M.M. (2003). Spinosad Toxicity to Pollinators and Associated Risk. In: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol 179. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21731-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21731-2_2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-00620-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21731-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics