Conclusions
The evolution of IVF has been rapid and significant. Once available to only a few couples around the world, IVF is now a viable therapeutic option for thousands of couples. No longer considered experimental, IVF has become a routine part of infertility treatment protocols. Success rates continue to improve, and costs continue to decrease. As advances in technology continue to simplify IVF procedures, IVF is rapidly becoming a routine part of infertility treatment in the office.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Suggested Reading
Adashi E, Rock J, Rosenwaks Z (eds). Reproductive Endocrinology, Surgery, and Technology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
Behr B, Pool T, Milki A, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with human blastocyst development in vitro without co-culture. Hum Reprod 1999;14:454–457.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, RESOLVE. The National Fertility Association. 1997 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. Atlanta: CDC, 1999:41.
CLIA’ 88 Final Rules: A Summary of Major Provisions of the Final Rules Implementing the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists, February 1992.
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988; Final Rule. Federal Register 1992;57:7002–7298.
Coroleu B, Carreras O, Veiga A, et al. Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:616–620.
Edwards R, Brody S. Principles and Practice of Assisted Reproduction. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1995.
Fluker M, Copeland J, Yuzpe A. An ounce of prevention: outpatient management of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 2000;73:821–824.
Gardner D. Development of serum-free media for the culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 1998;13:218–225.
Gardner D, Schoolcraft W, Wagley L, et al. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3434–3440.
Glass K, Green C, Fluker M, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of cervical irrigation at the time of embryo transfer [abstract no. O-085]. In: 2000 Annual Meeting Program Supplement of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. San Diego, CA: American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2000:S30.
Hammitt D, Barud K, Galanits T, et al. Post-ICSI culture of oocytes in G1.2 versus HTF-SSS-fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes [abstract no. P-025]. In: 2000 Annual Meeting Program Supplement of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. San Diego, CA: American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2000:S103.
Keel BA, May JV, DeJonge CJ. Handbook of the Assisted Reproduction Laboratory. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000.
May J, Hanshew K. Organization of the in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer laboratory. In: Keel B, Webster B (eds) CRC Handbook of the Laboratory Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1990:291–327.
Medical Research International, The American Fertility Society Special Interest Group. In Vitro Fertilization. Embryo Transfer in the United States: 1987 Results from the National IVF-ET Registry. Fertil Steril 1989;51:13–20.
Menezo Y, Nicollet B, Herbaut N, et al. Freezing cocultured human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 1992;58:977–980.
Palermo G, Cohen J, Alikani M, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel treatment for all forms of male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 1995;63:1231–1240.
Sallam H, Farrag A, Ezzeldin F, et al. Vigorous flushing of the cervical canal prior to embryo transfer-A prospective randomized study [abstract no. P-345]. In: 2000 Annual Meeting Program Supplement of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. San Diego, CA: American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2000:S203.
Surrey E, Schoolcraft W. Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2000;73:667–676.
Veeck LZ (eds) Cryopreservation of embryos/eggs. In: Adashi E, Rock J, Rosenwaks Z (eds) Reproductive Endocrinology, Surgery, and Technology, vol 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:2353–2365.
Wood E, Batzer F, Go K, et al. Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000;15:107–112.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bopp, B.L., Adaniya, G.K. (2002). In Vitro Fertilization in the Office Setting. In: Seifer, D.B., Collins, R.L. (eds) Office-Based Infertility Practice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21716-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21716-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21716-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive