Skip to main content

Hodgkin’s Disease

  • Chapter
Surgical Oncology
  • 258 Accesses

Conclusions

Patients with SCC due to metastatic disease of the spine must be simultaneously evaluated with regard to neurologic impairment, stability of the spine, and tumor type. A multidisciplinary approach is required for these patients including an internist, medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, and spinal surgeon. Compressive tumor extension can be treated effectively by radiotherapy for lesions that are radiosensitive, but radiotherapy cannot reverse a neurologic deficit if the SCC is a result of instability, vertebral collapse, or kyphosis. Spinal lesions with impending instability or current instability require spinal stabilization. The goals of surgery are to maintain or restore neurologic function and spinal stability, relieve pain, and maintain an independent quality of life. If the patient is medically able to undergo spinal surgery and has a life expectancy of 3 months or more, surgical intervention should be strongly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeVita VT, Mauch PM, Harris NL. Hodgkin’s disease. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:2242–2284.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:6–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brauninger A, Hansmann ML, Strickler JG, et al. Identification of common germinal-center B-cell precursors in two patients with both Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1239–1247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Medeiros LJ, Greiner TC. Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer 1995;75:357–369.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Das DK, Gupta SK, Datta BN, Sharma SC. Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of Hodgkin’s disease and its subtypes. I. Scope and limitations. Acta Cytol 1990;34:329–336.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fulciniti F, Vetrani A, Zeppa P, et al. Hodgkin’s disease: diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration; a report based on 62 consecutive cases. Cytopathology 1994;5:226–233.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart CJ, Duncan JA, Farquharson M, Richmond J. Fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of malignant lymphoma and reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. J Clin Pathol 1998;51:197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Das DK, Gupta SK. Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of Hodgkin’s disease and its subtypes. II. Subtyping by differential cell counts. Acta Cytol 1990;34:337–341.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pappa VI, Hussain HK, Reznek RH, et al. Role of image-guided core-needle biopsy in the management of patients with lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2427–2430.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ben-Yehuda D, Polliack A, Okon E, et al. Image-guided core-needle biopsy in malignant lymphoma: experience with 100 patients that suggests the technique is reliable. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2431–2434.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mann GB, Conlon KC, LaQuaglia M, et al. Emerging role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1909–1915.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lister TA, Crowther D, Sutcliffe SB, et al. Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: Cotswolds meeting. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:1630–1636. Erratum. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1602.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. AJCC. Hodgkin’s disease. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1998;259–261.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Breuer CK, Tarbell NJ, Mauch PM, et al. The importance of staging laparotomy in pediatric Hodgkin’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:1085–1089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yahalom J, Straus D. Hodgkin’s disease. In: Pazdur R, Coia LR, Hoskins WJ, Wagman LD (eds) Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 3rd ed. Melville, NY: PRR, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leibenhaut MH, Hoppe RT, Efron B, et al. Prognostic indicators of laparotomy findings in clinical stage I-II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:81–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cosset JM, Henry-Amar M, Meerwaldt JH, et al. The EORTC trials for limited stage Hodgkin’s disease: the EORTC Lymphoma Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer 1992;11:1847–1850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rock DB, Murray KJ, Schultz CJ, et al. Stage I and II Hodgkin’s disease in the pediatric population: long-term follow-up of patients staged predominantly clinically. Am J Clin Oncol 1996;19:174–178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jockovich M, Mendenhall NP, Sombeck MD, et al. Long-term complications of laparotomy in Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Surg 1994;219:615–621.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baccarani U, Carroll BJ, Hiatt JR, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open staging in Hodgkin disease. Arch Surg 1998;133:517–521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lefor AT, Flowers JL, Heyman MR. Laparoscopic staging of Hodgkin’s disease. Surg Oncol 1993;2:217–220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mason MD, Law M, Ashley S, et al. Infradiaphragmatic Hodgkin’s disease. Eur J Cancer 1992;11:1851–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoppe R, Winter J. Practice guidelines: Hodgkin’s disease. Presented at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 3rd Annual Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aragon de la Cruz G, Cardenes H, Otero J, et al. Individual risk of abdominal disease in patients with stages I and II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin’s disease: a rule index based on 341 laparotomized patients. Cancer 1989;63:1799–1803.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mauch P, Larson D, Osteen R, et al. Prognostic factors for positive surgical staging in patients with Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:257–265.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhatia S, Robison LL, Oberlin O, et al. Breast cancer and other second neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med 1996;334:745–751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lai, L.L., Schwarz, R.E. (2003). Hodgkin’s Disease. In: Saclarides, T.J., Millikan, K.W., Godellas, C.V. (eds) Surgical Oncology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21701-0_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21701-0_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95201-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21701-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics