Skip to main content

Introduction to Markov Models

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Acevedo, M., D. L. Urban, and M. Ablan. 1995. Transition and gap models of forest dynamics. Ecological Applications 5:1040–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo, M. F., D. L. Urban, and H. H. Shugart. 1996. Models of forest dynamics based on roles of tree species. Ecological Modelling 87:267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. L. 1989. A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecology 2:111–133. A general review and good introduction to a wider variety of models.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. B., M. Fiorella, J. Gray, E. Helmer, and K. Anderson. 1998. An efficient and accurate method for mapping forest clearcuts in the Pacific Northwest using Landsat imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 64:293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. B., T. A. Spies, and M. Fiorella. 1995. Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multiownership landscape of western Oregon, USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16:721–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMAT. 1993. Forest Ecosystem Management: An Ecological Economic, and Social Assessment, Report of Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team, July 1993, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, J. W. 1996. Modeling Biological Systems: Principles and Applications. Chapman and Hall, New York. The introductory Chapter and Chapter 8 on model validation are great background reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, F. G., D. B. Botkin, D. E. Strebel, K. D. Woods, and S. J. Goetz. 1991. Largescale patterns of forest succession as determined by remote sensing. Ecology 72:628–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. J., T. A Spies, F. J. Swanson, and J. L. Ohmann, 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests. BioScience 41:382–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, S. H., and D. J. Mladenoff. 1999a. Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest-landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology 80:81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, S. H., and D. J. Mladenoff. 1999b. The effects of seed dispersal on the simulation of long-term forest landscape change. Ecosystems 2:308–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C. 1977. A mathematical model of forest succession and land use for the North Carolina Piedmont. Bulletin Torrey Botanical Club 104:334–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C., and D. M. Sharpe. 1976. An analysis of forest dynamics in the northern Georgia Piedmont. Forest Science 22:307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcot, B. G., and J. W. Thomas. 1997. Of spotted owls, old growth, and new policies: A history since the Interagency Scientific Commmittee report. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-408. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff, D., and W. L. Baker, eds. 1999. Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. This book includes a good sampling of more recent approaches to modeling landscape dynamics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, W. G. 1988. Hard Times in Paradise, Coos Bay, Oregon, 1850–1986. University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, L. F., K. B. Aubry, A. B. Carey, and M. H. Huff (technical coordinators). 1991. Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-fir forests. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-285. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, F. H., and R. Costanza. 1991. The development of dynamic spatial models for landscape ecology: A review. In M. G. Turner and R. H. Gardner, eds. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 239–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, T. A., W. J. Ripple, and G. A. Bradshaw. 1994. Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecological Applications 4:555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G. 1987. Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: A comparison of 3 transition models. Landscape Ecology 1:29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. L., M. F. Acevedo, and S. L. Garman. 1999. Scaling fine-scale processes to large-scale patterns using models derived from models: Meta-models. In D. Mladenoff and W. Baker, eds. Spatial Modeling of Forest Landscape Change: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 70–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA FOREST SERVICE AND USDI BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT. 1994. Record of decision for amendments for Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl. USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M. B. 1992. Statistical models of succession. In D. C. Glenn-Lewin, R. K. Peet, and T. T. Veblen, eds. Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 215–248. This tutorial on Markov processes and statistical models is an excellent introduction to this type of model and includes clearly worked examples as well as formal treatment of more formal analysis of Markov models.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, D. O., M. E. Harmon, W. B. Cohen, M. Fiorella, and W. K. Ferrell. 1996a. Use of remote sensing to model land use effects on carbon flux in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. In H. L. Gholz, K. Nakane, and H. Shimoda, eds. The Use of Remote Sensing in the Modeling of Forest Productivity at Scales from the Stand to the Globe. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, D. O., F. J. Swanson, B. Marks, J. Kertis, and J. Cissel. 1996b. Comparison of managed and pre-settlement landscape dynamics in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 85:291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wear, D. N., and P. Bolstad. 1998. Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems 1:575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, D. A., and H. H. Shugart. 1983. Ecological modeling of landscape dynamics. In H. A. Mooney and M. Godron, eds. Disturbance and Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., and C. J. Webster. 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25:103–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urban, D.L., Wallin, D.O. (2002). Introduction to Markov Models. In: Gergel, S.E., Turner, M.G. (eds) Learning Landscape Ecology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95254-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21613-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics