Skip to main content

Interpreting Landscape Patterns from Organism-Based Perspectives

  • Chapter
Learning Landscape Ecology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Andres, Brad A. 1994. Coastal zone use by postbreeding shorebirds in northern Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management 58:206–212. This study addresses the impact of oil development on shorebird habitats and discusses management implications. It uses a vegetation map derived from Landsat imagery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. R. 1995. Chesapeake Bay watershed historical land use: Impact on water quality and diatom communities. Ecological Applications 5:703–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The Birders Handbook: A Field Guide to the Natural History of North American Birds. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: Species, ecosystem, or landscapes. Ecological Applications 3:202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F. 1994. Response to Tracy and Brussard. Ecological Applications 4: 208–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, P. B. 1992. The Land Manager’s Guide to Birds of the South. The Nature Conservancy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. J., S. L. Garman, B. Marks AND D. L. Urban. 1993. An approach for managing vertebrate diversity across multiple-use landscapes. Ecological Applications 3: 481–496. Describes an approach to balancing commodity production with the needs of terrestrial vertebrates. The approach is demonstrated for a watershed in western Oregon, balancing timber production with habitats used by birds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. J., S. L. Garman, J. F., Weigand, G. L Urban, W. C. Mccomb, and M. G. Raphael. 1995. Alternative silvicultural regimes in the Pacific Northwest: Simulations of ecological and economic effects. Ecological Applications 5:535–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, H. S., D. J. Mladenoff, V. C. Radeloff, and T. R. Crow. 1998. Integration of GIS data and classified satellite imagery for regional forest assessment. Ecological Applications 8:1072–1083. Demonstrates how satellite imagery and other spatial data can be combined to assess forest composition over a large region. The resulting maps could be used as input for modeling forest dynamics and to guide future management decisions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J. 1995. The role of science in formulating a biodiversity strategy. Bio-Science, Special supplement, pp. 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcnab, W. H. 1996. Classification of local-and landscape-scale ecological types in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 39:215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack, G. R. 1993. Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biological Conservation 66:185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, S. M., M. G. Turner, R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O’Neill. 1996. An organism-based perspective of habitat fragmentation. In Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes: Theory and Practice, R. C. Szaro, ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiners, W. A., A. F. Bouwman, W. F. J. Parsons, and M. Keller. 1994. Tropical rain forest conversion to pasture: Changes in vegetation and soil properties. Ecological Applications 4:363–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. K., F. R. Thompson III, T. M. Donovan, D. R. Whitehead, and J. Faaborg. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987–1990.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudis, V. A., and J. B. Tansey. 1995. Regional assessment of remote forests and black bear habitat from forest resource surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:170–181. The authors develop a model from forest inventory data and bear censuses to develop a map of suitable habitat for 12 states in the southern United States and evaluate the relative connection and isolation of habitat patches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenburg, W. 1998. When nature draws the map. Nature Conservancy 48:12–23. A layman’s introduction to using multiple geographic data sets for mapping ecosystems. It illustrates examples from the eastern and western United States as wells as the Caribbean. The article discusses strategies for conservation efforts on a regional scale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, C. R., and P. R. Brussard. 1994. Preserving biodiversity: Species in landscapes. Ecological Applications 4:205–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., S. R. Carpenter, E. J. Gustafson, R. J. Naiman, and S. M. Pearson. 1998. Land use. In Status and Trends of the Nation’s Biological Resources, M. J. Mac, P. A. Opler, C. E. Puckett Haecker, and P. D. Doran, eds. U. S. Dept. of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6:18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W. D., J. F. Parnell, and W. C. Briggs Jr. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Maryland. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs 26:1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3:385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A., and B. T. Milne. 1989. Scaling of “landscapes” in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle’s perspective. Landscape Ecology 3:87–96. Describes research conducted with beetles on “microlandscapes” in grasslands. The fractal structure of microlandscapes affected movement patterns.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, S. K., R. K. Peet, and P. S. White. 1998. Prediction of rare-plant occurrence: A southern Appalachian example. Ecological Applications 8:909–920. Uses a combination of field-collected data and topographic characteristics to generate predictive equations for four species of rare plants. This analysis sought to understand factors influencing the distribution of these species so that additional populations might be discovered and important habitats protected. The utility of such models is critically examined.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wofford, B. E. 1989. Guide to the Vascular Plants of the Blue Ridge. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearson, S.M. (2002). Interpreting Landscape Patterns from Organism-Based Perspectives. In: Gergel, S.E., Turner, M.G. (eds) Learning Landscape Ecology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21613-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95254-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21613-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics