Advertisement

Network Theory: An Evolving Approach to Landscape Conservation

  • Timothy H. Keitt
Chapter

Keywords

Span Tree Minimum Span Tree Habitat Patch Advance Very High Resolution Radiometer Advance Very High Resolution Radiometer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ando, A., J. Camm, S. Polasky, and A. Solow. 1998. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279:2126–2128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brook, B.W., J.J. O’Grady, A.P. Chapman, M.A. Burgman, H. Resit Akçakaya, and R. Frankham. 2000. Prediction accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404:385–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabeza, M. and A. Moilanen. 2001. Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:242–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Coulson, T., G.M. Mace, E. Hudson, and H. Possingham. 2001. The use and abuse of population viability analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:219–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennis, B., P.L. Munholland, and J.M. Scott. 1991. Estimation of growth and extinction parameters for endangered species. Ecological Monographs 64:205–224.Google Scholar
  6. Ellner, S.P., J. Fieberg, D. Ludwig, and C. Wilcox. 2002. Precision of population viability analysis. Conservation Biology. 14:258–261.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, D.L. and Z. Zhu. 1993. AVHRR for forest mapping: national applications and global implications. Pages 76–79 in A. Lewis, editor. Looking to the Future with an Eye on the Past. Proceedings of the 1993 ACSM/ASPRS convention. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, D.L., Z. Zhu, and K. Winterberger. 1993. Mapping forest distributions with AVHRR data. World Resource Review 5:66–71.Google Scholar
  9. Fieberg, J. and S.P. Ellner. 2000. When is it meaningful to estimate an extinction probability? Ecology 81:2040–2047.Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, R.H., B.T. Milne, R.V. O’Neill, and M.G. Turner. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology 1:19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanksi, I. 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Hanski, I. and O. Ovaskainen. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755–758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanski, I. and D. Simberloff 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain and application to conservation. Pages 5–26 in I. Hanski and M.E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Harary, F. 1969. Graph Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Keitt, T.H., A. Franklin, and D.L. Urban. 1995. Landscape analysis and metapopulation structure. Chapter 3 in Recovery Plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl. Volume II: Technical and supporting information. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Keitt,T.H., D.L. Urban, and B.T. Milne. 1997. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Ecology 1:4. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4.Google Scholar
  17. Kot, M., M.A. Lewis, and P. van den Driessche. 1996. Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. Ecology 77:2027–2042.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, J., M. Linderman, Z. Quyang, L. An, J. Yang, and H. Zhang. 2001. Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science 292:98–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ludwig, D. 1998. Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction? Ecology 80:298–310.Google Scholar
  20. Pimm, S.L., G.J. Russell, J.L. Gittleman, and T.M. Brooks. 1996. The future of biodiversity. Science 269:347–350.Google Scholar
  21. Riitters, K., J. Wickham, R. O’Neill, B. Jones, and E. Smith. 2000. Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology 4:3. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art3Google Scholar
  22. Sala, O.E., F.S. Chapin, J.J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L.F. Huenneke, R.B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D.M. Lodge, H.A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N.L. Poff, M.T. Sykes, B.H. Walker, M. Walker, D.H. Wall. 2000. Biodiversity-global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stauffer, D., and A. Aharony. 1985. Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor & Francis, London, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, I.M. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical forest: A review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:200–209.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI), Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995. Recovery Plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl. Volume I. USDI, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Urban, D.L. and T.H. Keitt. 2001. Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy H. Keitt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations