Advertisement

Large-Scale Regional Assessments: Lessons Learned from the Southern Appalachian Assessment

  • David N. Wear
Chapter
  • 187 Downloads

Keywords

Gypsy Moth Public Land National Forest Assessment Team Resource Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christensen, N.L. and J.F. Franklin. 1997. Ecosystem function and ecosystem management. Pages 1–23 in R.D. Simpson and N.L. Christensen, editors. Ecosystem Function and Human Activities: Reconciling Economics and Ecology. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Courtner, H.J., M.G. Wallace, and M.A. Moote. 1999. A political context model for bioregional assessments. Pages 71–82 in K.N. Johnson, F. Swanson, M. Herring, and S. Greene, editors. Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Daughtrey, M.L., C.R. Hibben, K.O. Britton, M.T. Windham, and S.C. Redlin. 1996. Dogwood Anthracnose: Understanding a disease new to North America. Plant Disease 80:349–358.Google Scholar
  4. Dunlap, R.E. 1991. Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965–1990. Society and Natural Resources 4:285–312.Google Scholar
  5. Federal Register. 1996. Revised land and resource management plans for the national forests in Alabama, Chattahoochee/Oconee National Forests, Cherokee National Forest, Jefferson National Forest, and the Sumter National Forest. Federal Register 61:40183–40191, August 1, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Gottfried, R.R., D.N. Wear, and R.G. Lee. 1996. Institutional solutions to market failure on the landscape scale. Ecological Economics 18:133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen, M.H., F. Thomas, and J.F. Glover. 1992. The Eastwide Forest Inventory Database Users Manual. General Technical Report NC-151. North Central Forest Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Haynes, R.W., D.M. Adams, and J.R. Mills. 1995. The 1993 RPA Timber Assessment Update. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-GTR-259. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Hepting, G.H. 1974. Death of the American chestnut. Journal of Forest History 18:60–67.Google Scholar
  10. Holling, C.S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, K.N., F. Swanson, M. Herring, and S. Greene. 1999. Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Liebhold, A.M., J.A. Halverson, and G.E. Elmes. 1992. Gypsy moth invasion in North America: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Biogeography 19:513–520.Google Scholar
  13. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative (SAMAB). 1996a. The Southern Appalachian Assessment: Summary Report. Report 1 of 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative (SAMAB). 1996b. The Southern Appalachian Assessment: Aquatic Technical Report. Report 2 of 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative (SAMAB). 1996c. The Southern Appalachian Assessment: Atmospheric Technical Report. Report 3 of 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative (SAMAB). 1996d. The Southern Appalachian Assessment: Social/Cultural Economic Technical Report. Report 4 of 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative (SAMAB). 1996e. The Southern Appalachian Assessment: Terrestrial Technical Report. Report 5 of 5. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative (SAMAB). 1999. Use of the Southern Appalachian Assessment and Database. URL: http://samab.org/saa/usesaa.html.
  19. Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere Cooperative (SAMAB). 2001. The Southern Appalachian Man and the Biosphere web site. URL: http://samab.org/About/about.html.
  20. Swallow, S.K. and D.N. Wear. 1993. Spatial interactions in multiple-use forestry and substitution and wealth effects for the single stand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25:103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Turner, M.G., D.N. Wear, and R.O. Flamm. 1996. Land ownership and land cover dynamics in the Southern Appalachian highlands and Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Applications 6:1150–1172.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service. 1997. Strategic Framework for the Southern Research Station. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service. 1999. Ozark-Ouachita Highlands Assessment: Summary Report. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Wear, D.N. and P. Bolstad. 1998. Land-use changes in Southern Appalachian landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems 1:575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wondolleck, J.M. and S.L. Yaffee. 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • David N. Wear

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations