Advertisement

Modeling Fish Entrainment and Impingement Impacts: Bridging Science and Policy

  • Webb Van Winkle
  • John Kadvany
Chapter

Keywords

Environmental Protection Agency Decision Criterion Striped Bass Early Life Stage Ecological Risk Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambrose, R., R. Schmitt, and C. Osenberg. 1996. Predicted and observed environmental impacts: Can we foretell ecological change? Pages 345–369 in R.J. Schmitt and C.W. Osenberg, editors. Detecting Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Applications in Coastal Habitats. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, W. and E. Gotting. 2001. Taken in over intake structures? Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 26:1–79.Google Scholar
  3. Barnthouse, L.W. 1992. The role of models in ecological risk assessment: A 1990’s perspective. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 11:1751–1760.Google Scholar
  4. Barnthouse, L.W. 2000. Impacts of power-plant cooling systems on estuarine fish populations: The Hudson River after 25 years. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S341–S348.Google Scholar
  5. Barnthouse, L.W., J. Boreman, S.W Christensen, C.P. Goodyear, W Van Winkle, and D.S. Vaughan. 1984. Population biology in the courtroom: the Hudson River controversy. BioScience 34:14–19.Google Scholar
  6. Barnthouse, L.W., J. Boreman, T.L. Englert, W.L. Kirk, and E.G. Horn. 1988. Hudson River settlement agreement: Technical rationale and cost considerations. Pages 267–273 in L.W. Barnthouse et al., editors. Science, Law, and Hudson River Power Plants: A Case Study in Environmental Impact Assessment. Monograph 4. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Boreman, J. 2000. Surplus production, compensation, and impact assessments of power plants. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S445–S449.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, S.W. and T.L. Englert. 1988. Historical development of entrainment models for Hudson River striped bass. Pages 133–142 in L.W. Barnthouse et al., editors. Science, Law, and Hudson River Power Plants: A Case Study in Environmental Impact Assessment. Monograph 4. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Clemen, R.T. 1991. Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. PWS-Kent, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Coutant, C.C. 2000. What is “normative” at cooling water intakes? Defining normalcy before judging adverse. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S37–S42.Google Scholar
  11. Dey, W.P., S.M. Jinks, and G.J. Lauer. 2000. The 316(b) assessment process: Evolution towards a risk-based approach. Environmental Science & Policy 3 (Supplement 1):S15–S24.Google Scholar
  12. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). 1999. Catalog of Assessment Methods for Evaluating the Effects of Power Plant Operations on Aquatic Communities. TR-112013. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). 2002. Evaluating the Effects of Power Plant Operations on Aquatic Communities: Guidelines for Selection of Assessment Methods. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA. EPRI Report 1005176.Google Scholar
  14. Foster, K. and P. Huber. 1997. Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Gentile, J.H. and M.A. Harwell. 1998. The issue of significance in ecological risk assessments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 4:815–828.Google Scholar
  16. Gregory, R., S. Lichtenstein, and P. Slovic. 1993. Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7:177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heppell, S., C. Pfister, and H. de Kroon. 2000. Elasticity analysis in population biology: Methods and applications. Ecology 81:605–606.Google Scholar
  18. Hilborn, R. and M. Mangel. 1997. The Ecological Detective. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Hilborn, R., J.J. Maguire, A.M. Parma, and A.A. Rosenberg. 2001. The precautionary approach and risk management: Can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 58:99–107.Google Scholar
  20. Hutchings, J.A. 2001. Conservation biology of marine fishes: Perceptions and caveats regarding assignment of extinction risk. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keeney, R. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Lackey, R.T 1994. Ecological risk assessment. Fisheries 19:14–18.Google Scholar
  23. Lackey, R.T. 1998. Fisheries management: Integrating societal preference, decision analysis, and ecological risk assessment. Environmental Science & Policy 1:329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lackey, R.T. 1999. Salmon policy: Science, society, restoration, and reality. Environmental Science & Policy 2:369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lane, D.E. and R.L. Stephenson. 1995. Fisheries management science: The framework to link biological, economic, and social objectives in fisheries management. Aquatic Living Resources 8:215–221.Google Scholar
  26. Lane, D.E. and R.L. Stephenson. 1998. A framework for risk analysis in fisheries decision-making. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lohner, T.W., G. Seegert, J. Vondruska, and E. Perry. 2000. Assessment of 316(b) impact on Ohio river fish populations. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S249–S259.Google Scholar
  28. Lorda, E., D.J. Danila, and J.D. Miller. 2000. Application of a population dynamics model to the probabilistic assessment of cooling water intake effects of Millstone Nuclear Power Station (Waterford, CT) on a nearby winter flounder spawning stock. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S471–S482.Google Scholar
  29. May, J.R. and M.K. van Rossum. 1995. The quick and the dead: Fish entrainment, entrapment, and the implementation and application of Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. Vermont Law Review 20:375–493.Google Scholar
  30. Mayhew, D.A., L.D. Jensen, D.F. Hanson, and P.H. Muessig. 2000. A comparative review of entrainment survival studies at power plants in estuarine environments. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S295–S302.Google Scholar
  31. McCarty, L.S. and M. Power. 2000. Approaches to developing risk management objectives: An analysis of international strategies. Environmental Science & Policy 3:311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagle, D.G. and J.T. Morgan, Jr. 2000. Forward. A draft regulatory framework for analyzing potential adverse environmental impact from cooling water intake structures. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):ix–xiv.Google Scholar
  33. National Research Council. 1986. Ecological Knowledge and Environmental Problem-Solving: Concepts and Case Studies. National Academy Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Payne, J., J. Bettman, and E. Johnson. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Power, M. and L.S. McCarty. 1998. A comparative analysis of environmental risk assessment management frameworks. Environmental Science & Technology 32:224A–231A.Google Scholar
  36. Riverkeeper, Inc., et al. 2000. Comments on EPA’s Proposed Regulation for Cooling Water Intake Structures at New Facilities under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. Natural Resources Defense Council, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, K.A. 2000. Why are quantitative relationships between environmental quality and fish populations so elusive? Ecological Applications 10:367–385.Google Scholar
  38. Rose, K.A. and J.H. Cowan, Jr. 2000. Predicting fish population dynamics: Compensation and the importance of site-specific considerations. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S433–S443.Google Scholar
  39. Schnute, J.T. and L.J. Richards. 2001. Use and abuse of fishery models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 58:10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shrader-Frechette, K.S. and E. McCoy. 1993. Method in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Suter, G.W. 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Swartzman, G., R. Deriso, and C. Cowan. 1977. Comparison of simulation models used in assessing the effects of power-plant-induced mortality on fish populations. Pages 333–361 in W Van Winkle, editor. Assessing the Effects of Power-Plant-Induced Mortality on Fish Populations. Pergamon Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Taft, E.P. 2000. Fish protection technologies: A status report. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S349–S360.Google Scholar
  44. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. USEPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. USEPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2000. National pollutant discharge elimination system. Regulations addressing cooling water intake structures for new facilities. www.epa.gov/owm/316b.htm and Federal Register 65:49060, August 10,2000, Section VII.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Planning for Ecological Risk Assessment: Developing Management Objectives. EPA/630/R-01/001A. Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Utility Water Act Group. 2000. Comments of the utility water act group on EPA’s proposed 316(b) rule for new facilities and ICR No. 1973.01, Federal Register 65, August 10, 2000. Submitted November 9, 2000. Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
  49. Van Winkle, W. 2000. A perspective on power generation impacts and compensation in fish populations. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1):S425–S431.Google Scholar
  50. Van Winkle, W., K.A. Rose, and R.C. Chambers. 1993. Individual-based approach to fish population dynamics: An overview. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122:397–403.Google Scholar
  51. Veil, J.A. 2000. Potential impacts of 316(b) regulatory controls on economics, electricity reliability, and the environment. Environmental Science & Policy 3(Supplement 1): S1–S6.Google Scholar
  52. Wiens, J. 1996. Oil, seabirds, and science: the effects of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. BioScience 46:587–597.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Webb Van Winkle
  • John Kadvany

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations