Science and Management Investments Needed to Enhance the Use of Ecological Modeling in Decision Making

  • Lev Ginzburg
  • H. Resit Akçakaya


Ecological Model Conservation Biology Land Snail Landscape Model American Ginseng 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akçakaya, H.R. 1994. RAMAS Metapop: Viability Analysis for Stage-Structured Metapopulations. Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Akçakaya, H.R. 1998. RAMAS GIS: Linking Landscape Data with Population Viability Analysis. Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Akçakaya, H.R. 2000. Population viability analyses with demographically and spatially structured models. Ecological Bulletins 48:23–38.Google Scholar
  4. Akçakaya, H.R. 2001. Linking population-level risk assessment with landscape and habitat models. Science of the Total Environment 274:283–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Akçakaya, H.R., M.A. McCarthy, and J. Pearce. 1995. Linking landscape data with population viability analysis: Management options for the helmeted honeyeater. Biological Conservation 73:169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Akçakaya, H.R. and B. Baur. 1996. Effects of population subdivision and catastrophes on the persistence of a land snail metapopulation. Oecologia 105:475–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Akçakaya, H.R. and J.L. Atwood. 1997. A habitat-based metapopulation model of the California gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology 11:422–434.Google Scholar
  8. Akçakaya, H.R. and M.G. Raphael. 1998. Assessing human impact despite uncertainty: Viability of the northern spotted owl metapopulation in the northwestern USA. Biodiversity and Conservation 7:875–894.Google Scholar
  9. Akçakaya, H.R. and P. Sjögren-Gulve. 2000. Population viability analysis in conservation planning: An overview. Ecological Bulletins 48:9–21.Google Scholar
  10. Armbruster, P. and R. Lande. 1993. A population viability analysis for African elephant (Loxodonta africana): How big should reserves be? Conservation Biology 7:602–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulak, J.S., D.S. Wethey, and M.G. White III. 1995. Evaluation of management options for a striped bass population in the Santee-Cooper system. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 15:84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burgman, M.A., S. Ferson, and H.R. Akçakaya. 1993. Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Breininger, D.R., M.A. Burgman, H.R. Akçakaya, and M.A. O’Connell. 2002. Use of metapopulation models in conservation planning. In K. Gutzwiller, editor. Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Brevard County Office of Natural Resources. 1995. Scrub Conservation and Development Plan. Brevard County Office of Natural Resources, Melbourne, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Brook, B.W., J.J. O’Grady, A.P. Chapman, M.A. Burgman, H.R. Akçakaya, and R. Frankham. 2000. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404:385–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Burgman, M.A., S. Ferson, and H.R. Akçakaya. 1993. Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  17. Caswell, H. 1989. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Crowder, L.B., D.T. Crouse, S.S. Heppell, and T.H. Martin. 1994. Predicting the impact of turtle excluder devices on loggerhead sea turtle populations. Ecological Applications 4:437–445.Google Scholar
  19. Crutchfield, J. and S. Ferson. 2000. Predicting recovery of a fish population after heavy metal impacts. Environmental Science & Policy 3:S183–S189.Google Scholar
  20. Drechsler, M., et al. 1999. Modelling the persistence of an apparently immortal Banksia species after fire and land clearing. Biological Conservation 88:249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fahrig, L. and G. Merriam. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66:1762–68.Google Scholar
  22. Gilpin, M.E. and I. Hanski, editors. 1991. Metapopulation Dynamics. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Goldingay, R. and H.P. Possingham. 1995. Area requirements for viable populations of the Australian gliding marsupial, Petaurus australis. Biological Conservation 73:161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldstein, P.Z. 1999. Functional ecosystems and biodiversity buzzwords. Conservation Biology 13:247–255.Google Scholar
  25. Gross, K., J.R. Lockwood, III, C.C. Frost, and W.F. Morris. 1998. Modeling controlled burning and trampling reduction for conservation of Hudsonia montana. Conservation Biology 12:1291–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanski, I., A. Moilanen, and M. Gyllenberg. 1996. Minimum viable metapopulation size. American Naturalist 147:527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heppell, S.S., L.B. Crowder, and D.T. Crouse. 1996. Models to evaluate headstarting as a management tool for long-lived turtles. Ecological Applications 6:556–565.Google Scholar
  28. Kaye, T.N., K. Pendergrass, and K.K. Finley. 1994. Population Biology of Lomatum bradshawii: I. Population Viability Analysis under Three Prairie Burning Treatments. Oregon Department of Agriculture, Salem, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Kokko, H., J. Lindström, and E. Ranta. 1997. Risk analysis of hunting of seal populations in the Baltic. Conservation Biology 11:917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. LaHaye, W.S., R.J. Gutiérrez, and H.R. Akçakaya. 1994. Spotted owl metapopulation dynamics in southern California. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:775–785.Google Scholar
  31. Lamberson, R.H., B.R. Noon, C. Voss, and K.S. McKelvey. 1994. Reserve design for territorial species: The effects of patch size and spacing on the viability of the northern spotted owl. Conservation Biology 8:185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawton, J.H. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192.Google Scholar
  33. Leslie, P.H. 1945. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33:183–212.Google Scholar
  34. Levin, L., H. Caswell, T Bridges, C. DiBacco, D. Cabrera, and G. Plaia. 1996. Demographic responses of estuarine polychaetes to pollutants: Life table response experiments. Ecological Applications 6:1295–1313.Google Scholar
  35. Levins, R. 1970. Extinction. Pages 77–107 in M. Gerstenhaber, editor. Some Mathematical Questions in Biology. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Lindenmayer, D.W. and H.P. Possingham. 1996. Ranking conservation and timber management options for Leadbeater’s possum in southeastern Australia using population viability analysis. Conservation Biology 10:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Litvaitis, A.J. and R. Villafuerte. 1996. Factors affecting the persistence of New England cottontail metapopulations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24:686–693.Google Scholar
  38. Marschall, E.A. and L.B. Crowder. 1996. Assessing population responses to multiple anthropogenic effects: A case study with brook trout. Ecological Applications 6:152–167.Google Scholar
  39. Maschinsky, J., R. Fyre, and S. Rutman. 1997. Demography and population viability of an endangered plant species before and after protection from trampling. Conservation Biology 11:990–999.Google Scholar
  40. Mladenoff, D.J., G.E. Host, J. Boeder, and T.R. Crow. 1996. LANDIS: A spatial simulation model of forest landscape disturbance, management, and succession. Pages 175–179 in Second International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, California, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Nantel, P., D. Gagnon, and A. Nault. 1996. Population viability analysis of American ginseng and wild leek harvested in stochastic environments. Conservation Biology 10:608–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1995. Public review draft. Marbled Murrelet: Biological Status Assessment. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Wildlife Division, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Pascual, M.A. and M.D. Adkinson. 1994. The decline of the Steller sea lion in the northeast Pacific: Demography, harvest or environment? Ecological Applications 4:393–403.Google Scholar
  44. Price, M. and M. Gilpin. 1996. Modelers, mammalogists, and metapopulations: Designing Steven’s kangaroo rat reserves. Pages 217–240 in D.R. McCullough, editor. Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  45. Regan,T., K. Bonham, H. Regan, R. Taylor, D. Tuson, and M. Burgman. 1999. Forest Management and Conservation of Tasmaphena lamproides in North West Tasmania: Use of Population Viability Analysis to Evaluate Management Options. Final report to Forestry Tasmania. University of Melbourne and Forestry Tasmania, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  46. Root, K.V. 1998. Evaluating the effects of habitat quality, connectivity and catastrophes on a threatened species. Ecological Applications 8:854–865.Google Scholar
  47. Root, K.V., C.S. Grogan, and H.R. Akçakaya. 1997. RAMAS Ecological Risk Model for Assessing Temperature Effects on Redhorse Sucker Species in the Muskingum River. Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Sjögren-Gulve, P. and C. Ray. 1996. Using logistic regression to model metapopulation dynamics: Large-scale forestry extirpates the pool frog. Pages 111–137 in D.R. McCullough, editor. Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  49. U.S. Department of the Interior (USDOI),Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996a. Golden-Cheeked Warbler Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Report. USDOI, Fish and Wildlife Service, Austin, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  50. U.S. Department of the Interior (USDOI), Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996b. Black-Capped Vireo Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Report. USDOI, Fish and Wildlife Service, Austin, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  51. Verboom, J., A. Schotman, P. Opdam, and J.A.J Metz. 1991. European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61:149–156.Google Scholar
  52. Verner, J., M.L. Morrison, and C.J. Ralph, editors. 1986. Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  53. Walthall, W.K. and J.D. Start. 1997. Comparison of two population-level ecotoxicological endpoints: The intrinsic (rm) and instantaneous (ri) rates of increase. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16:1068–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lev Ginzburg
  • H. Resit Akçakaya

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations