Advertisement

Role of Computational Toolkits in Environmental Management

  • Jeffery P. Holland
  • Steven M. Bartell
  • Thomas G. Hallam
  • S.T. Purucker
  • Christopher J.E. Welsh
Chapter
  • 190 Downloads

Keywords

Decision Maker Total Maximum Daily Loading Environmental System Research Institute Resource Management Decision Environmental Resource Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babovic, V. and V.H. Bojkov. 2001. Runoff Modeling with Genetic Programming and Artificial Neural Networks. D2K Technical Report 0401-1. Danish Hydraulics Institute (DHI) Water and Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  2. Case, M.P., T. Gunther, W.D. Goran, J.P. Holland, D. Johnston, G. Lessard, and W.J. Schmidt. 2000. Decision Support Capabilities for Future Technology Requirements. ERDC TR-01-2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Champaign, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Committee of Scientists. 1999. Sustaining the People’s Lands: Recommendations for Stewardship of the National Forests and Grasslands into the Next Century. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Crowe, S. 2000. Spatial modeling environments: Integration of GIS and conceptual modeling frameworks. Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling (GIS/EM4): Problems, Prospects and Research Needs, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2–8 September, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Danish Hydraulics Institute (DHI). 1999. MIKE SHE Water Movement User Manual. DHI Software, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  6. Deliman, P.N., C.E. Ruiz, and J.A. Gerald. 2000. Development of a web-based risk assessment modeling system. Pages 178–191 in F.T. Price, K.V. Brix, and N.K. Lane, editors. Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment: Recent Achievements in Environmental Fate and Transport. Volume 9. ASTM STP 1381. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
  7. English, M.R., V.H. Dale, C. Van Riper-Geibig, and W.H. Ramsey. 1999. Overview. Pages 1–31 in V. Dale, and M. English, editors. Tools to Aid Environmental Decision Making. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). 2002. ModelBuilder for ArcView Spatial Analyst 2, an ESRI White Paper. ESRI, Redlands, California, USA. Also see http://ww.esri.com/.Google Scholar
  9. Fulp, T.J., and D.K. Frevert. 1998. Watershed and river systems management programs: Current and future applications in the Bureau of Reclamation. Pages 5–71 to 5–78 in Volume 2, Section 5, Proceedings of the First Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, 19–23 April, 1998. Subcommittee on Hydrology of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Holland, J.P. 1998. Hydroinformatic Advancements in Integrated Hydroenvironmental Modeling Systems. Hydroinformatics 98. International Association of Hydraulic Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  11. Holland, J.P. 2001. The land management system: A framework to support future water and natural resources decision making. Hydrologic Science and Technology 17:155–166.Google Scholar
  12. Holland J.P., and W.D. Goran. 1999. Development of an Integrated Land System in Support of Department of Defense Land Management. ERDC-CERLTR-99-86. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Holland, J.P., J.F. Peters, S.E. Howington, and R.S. Maier. 2001. Science and modernization in hydroenvironmental modeling systems. Pages 410–417 in Proceedings of the 22nd Army Science Conference, Accelerating the Pace of the Transformation to the Objective Force, Baltimore, Maryland, 11–13 December, 2000. CD-ROM. Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, K.N., J. Agee, R. Beschta, V Dale, L. Hardesty, J. Long, L. Nielsen, B. Noon, R. Sedjo, M. Shannon, R. Trosper, C. Wilkinson, and J. Wondolleck. 1999. Sustaining the people’s lands: Recommendations for stewardship of the national forests and grasslands into the next century. Journal of Forestry 97:6–12.Google Scholar
  15. Lahlou, M., L. Shoemaker, S. Choudhury, R. Elmer, A. Hu, H. Manguerra, and A. Parker. 1998. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources: BASINS, Version 2 Users Manual. EPA/823/B-98-006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Lake, R. 2001. GMS 2.0, enabling the geospatial web. Geospatial Solutions, July, 38–41.Google Scholar
  17. Leavesley, G.H., P.J. Restrepo, S.L. Markstrom, M. Dixon, and L.G. Stannard. 1996. The Modular Modeling System—MMS: User’s Manual. Open File Report 96-151. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  18. National Center for Supercomputing Applications. 2001. HDF5 reference manual, release 1.4.1. Hierarchical Data Format Group, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. USEPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Whelan, G, K.J. Castleton, J.W. Buck, B.L. Hoopes, M.A. Pelton, D.L. Strenge, G.M. Gelston, and R.N. Kickert. 1997. Concepts of a Framework for Risk Analysis in Multimedia Environmental Systems. PNNL-11748. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Westervelt, J. A. 2001. Development of the LMS Conceptualization Level. Technical report for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center in fulfillment of Contract Number DACA88-99-0-0234, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Zagona, E.A.,T.J. Fulp, H.M. Goranflo, and R.M. Shane. 1998. Riverware: A general river and reservoir modeling environment. Pages 5–113 to 5–120 in Volume 2, Section 5, Proceedings of the First Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, 19–23 April, 1998. Subcommittee on Hydrology of the Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffery P. Holland
  • Steven M. Bartell
  • Thomas G. Hallam
  • S.T. Purucker
  • Christopher J.E. Welsh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations