Advertisement

Effective Ecological Modeling for Use in Management Decisions: Data Issues

  • David Hohler
  • Tom Ashwood
  • John R. Richardson
  • Lisa Mai Olsen
  • Noble Hendrix
  • Alison Williams
Chapter
  • 190 Downloads

Keywords

Geographic Information System Spatial Data Data Issue Data Collection Effort Geographic Information System Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akcakaya, H.R. and J.L. Atwood. 1997. A habitat-based metapopulation model of the California gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology 11:422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, C., Jr., D.L. Civco, M.P. Prisloe, Jr., J.D. Hurd, and J.W. Stocker. 2000. Remote sensing-enhanced outreach education as a decision support system for local land-use officials. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66:1251–1260.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, M.C., editor. 1994. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Indicator Development Strategy. EPA/620/R-94/022. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Beard, K., H.N. Hengartner, and D.K. Skelly. 1999. Effectiveness of predicting breeding bird distributions using probabilistic models. Conservation Biology 13:1108–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, M.B. 1987. Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resources Research 23:1393–1442.Google Scholar
  6. Bedford, T. 1998. Sensitivity indices for (tree-) dependent variables. Pages 17–20 in K. Chan, S. Tarantola, and F. Campolongo, editors. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output (SAMO98). EUR report 17758 EN. European Commission, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, R.P. 1997. Improving habitat suitability index models. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:163–167.Google Scholar
  8. Cairns, J. and E.P. Smith. 1993. The statistical validity of biomonitoring data. Pages 49–68 in S.L. Loeb and A. Spacie, editors. Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Conquest, L.L., S.C. Ralph, and R.J. Naiman. 1993. Implementation of large-scale monitoring efforts: Sampling design and data analysis issues. Pages 69–90 in S.L. Loeb and A. Spacie, editors. Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Chernick, M.R. 1983. Influence functions, outlier detection, and data editing. Pages 167–176 in T. Wright, editor. Statistical Methods and the Improvement of Data Quality. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Church, M.R., K.W Thornton, P.W. Shaffer, D.L. Stevens, B.P. Rochelle, G.R. Holdren, M.G. Johnson, J.J. Lee, R.S. Turner, D.L. Cassell, D.A. Lammers, W.G. Campbell, C.I. Liff, C.C. Brandt, L.H. Liegel, G.D. Bishop, D.C. Mortenson, S.M. Pierson, and D.D. Schmoyer. 1989. Direct/Delayed Response Project: Future Effects of Long-Term Sulfur Deposition on Surface Water Chemistry in the Northeast and Southern Blue Ridge Province. 1989. EPA/600/3-89/061 a-d. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Cressie, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  14. D’Erchia, F. 1997. Geographic information systems and remote sensing applications for ecosystem management. Pages 201–225 in M.S. Boyce and A. Haney, editors. Ecosystem Management: Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Fayerweather, W.E., S.L. Tirey, J.K. Baldwin, and B.K. Hoover. 1991. Issues in data sharing and access: An industry perspective. Journal of Occupational Medicine 33:1253–1256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Feist, B.E., E.A. Steel, G.R. Pess, and R.E. Bilby. What is the correct scale for habitat analyses aimed at prioritizing restoration efforts for salmon? Conservation Biology (submitted).Google Scholar
  17. Forman, R.T.T. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Fosnight, E.A. and D. Greenlee. 2000. Map data in support of forest management. Journal of Forestry 98:50–52.Google Scholar
  19. Fürbinger, J.M. and A.C. Roulet. 1994. Sensitivity analysis, an unavoidable step in the evaluation of simulation program. Presented at European Conference on Energy Performance and Indoor Climate in Building, Lyon, France, 24–26 November, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Gerrard, R., P. Stine, R. Church, and M. Gilpin. 2001. Habitat evaluation using GIS: A case study applied to the San Joaquin kit fox. Landscape and Urban Planning 52:239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gould, W.R. and J.D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of temporal variability of survival in animal populations. Ecology 79:2531–2538.Google Scholar
  22. Green, K. 2000. Selecting and interpreting high-resolution images. Journal of Forestry 98:37–39.Google Scholar
  23. Guisan, A. and N.E. Zimmerman. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modeling 135:147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hilborn, R. and M. Mangel. 1997. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, K.N., F. Swanson, M. Herring, and S. Greene. 1999. Bioregional Assessments. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Kirk, R.E. 1995. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Kish, L. 1995. Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Knick, S.T. and D.L. Dyer. 1997. Distribution of black-tailed jackrabbit habitat determined by GIS in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:75–85.Google Scholar
  29. Lachowski, H., P. Maus, and N. Roller. 2000. From pixels to decisions: Digital remote sensing technologies for public land managers. Journal of Forestry 98:13–15.Google Scholar
  30. Landres, P.B., J. Verner, and J.W. Thomas. 1988. Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: A critique. Conservation Biology 2:316–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Littell, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, and R.D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS System for Mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin. 1983. Missing data in large data sets. Pages 73–82 in T. Wright, editor. Statistical methods and the improvement of data quality. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Mann, L.K., A.W. King, V.H. Dale, W.W. Hargrove, R.A. Washington-Allen, L.R. Pounds, and T.L. Ashwood. 1999. The role of soil classification in GIS modeling of habitat pattern: Threatened calcareous ecosystems. Ecosystems 2:524–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Macilwain, C. 1996. Researchers resist copyright laws that could endanger data access. Nature 383:653.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Macilwain, C. 1999. US university fears allayed over access to research data. Nature 401:732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. National Research Council (NRC). 1990. Managing Troubled Waters: Role of Marine Environmental Monitoring. National Academy Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  38. National Research Council (NRC). 1995. Review of EPA’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Overall Evaluation. National Academy Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Noon, B.R., T.A. Spies, and M.G. Raphael. 1999. Conceptual basis for designing an effectiveness monitoring program in the strategy and design of the effectiveness monitoring program for the Northwest Forest Plan. Pages 21–48 in B.S. Mulder, B.R. Noon, T.A. Spies, M.G. Raphael, C.J. Craig, A.R. Olsen, G.H. Reeves, and H.H. Welsh, editors. The Strategy and Design of the Effectiveness Monitoring Program for the Northwest Forest Plan. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-437. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Overton, W.S., D. White, and D.L. Stevens. 1990. Design report for EMAP-Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. EPA/600/3-91/053. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Palmer, C.J., K.H. Riitters, T. Strickland, D.L. Cassell, and G.E. Byers. 1992. Monitoring and Research Strategy for Forests-Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP), volume 1. EPA/600/4-91/012. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Platt, J.R. 1964. Strong inference. Science 146:347–353.Google Scholar
  43. Quigley, T.M. and H.B. Cole. 1997. Highlighted Scientific Findings of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-404. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  44. Riitters, K., M. Papp, D. Cassell, and J. Hazard, editors. 1991. Forest Health Monitoring Plot Design and Logistics Study. EPA/600/S3-91/051. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  45. Robinson, A.H., R.D. Sale, J.L. Morrison, and P.C. Muehrcke. 1984. Elements of Cartography. 5th edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  46. Running, S.W., L. Queen, and M. Thornton. 2000. The Earth Observing System and forest management. Journal of Forestry 98:29–31.Google Scholar
  47. Saltelli, A., K. Chan, M. Scott, editors. 2000. Sensitivity Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Scheaffer, R.L., W. Mendenhall, and L. Ott. 1990. Elementary Survey Sampling. 4th edition. Duxbury Press, Belmont, California, USA.Google Scholar
  49. Starfield, A.M. 1997. A pragmatic approach to modeling for wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:261–270.Google Scholar
  50. Stewart, A.J. and J.M. Loar. 1994. Spatial and temporal variation in biomonitoring data. Pages 91-124 in S.L. Loeb and A. Spacie, editors. Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  51. Stewart-Oaten, A., W.W. Murdoch, and S.J. Walde. 1995. Estimation of temporal variability in populations. American Naturalist 146:519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stoms, D.M., F.W. Davis, and C.B. Cogan. 1992. Sensitivity of wildlife habitat models to uncertainties in GIS data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58:843–850.Google Scholar
  53. Van Remortel, R.D., G.E. Byers, J.E. Teberg, M.J. Miah, C.J. Palmer, M.L. Papp, M.H. Bartling, A.D. Tansey, D.L. Cassell, and P.W. Shaffer. 1988. Direct/Delayed Response Project: Quality Assurance Report for Physical and Chemical Analyses of Soils from the Southern Blue Ridge Province of the United States. EPA/600/8-88/100. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar
  54. Walter, C. and E.P. Richards III. 2000. When does the Freedom of Information Act apply to privately held data produced under a federal grant? IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 19:121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. White, G.C. 2000. Population viability analysis: Data requirements and essential analyses. Pages 288–331 in L. Boitani and T.K. Fuller, editors. Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  56. With, K.A. 1997. The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 11:1069–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Hohler
  • Tom Ashwood
  • John R. Richardson
  • Lisa Mai Olsen
  • Noble Hendrix
  • Alison Williams

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations