Effective Ecological Modeling for Use in Management Decisions: Data Issues

Akcakaya, H.R. and J.L. Atwood. 1997. A habitat-based metapopulation model of the California gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology 11:422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, C., Jr., D.L. Civco, M.P. Prisloe, Jr., J.D. Hurd, and J.W. Stocker. 2000. Remote sensing-enhanced outreach education as a decision support system for local land-use officials. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66:1251–1260.Google Scholar

Barber, M.C., editor. 1994. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Indicator Development Strategy. EPA/620/R-94/022. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar

Beard, K., H.N. Hengartner, and D.K. Skelly. 1999. Effectiveness of predicting breeding bird distributions using probabilistic models. Conservation Biology 13:1108–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, M.B. 1987. Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resources Research 23:1393–1442.Google Scholar

Bedford, T. 1998. Sensitivity indices for (tree-) dependent variables. Pages 17–20 in K. Chan, S. Tarantola, and F. Campolongo, editors. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output (SAMO98). EUR report 17758 EN. European Commission, Luxembourg.Google Scholar

Brooks, R.P. 1997. Improving habitat suitability index models. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:163–167.Google Scholar

Cairns, J. and E.P. Smith. 1993. The statistical validity of biomonitoring data. Pages 49–68 in S.L. Loeb and A. Spacie, editors. Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar

Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

Conquest, L.L., S.C. Ralph, and R.J. Naiman. 1993. Implementation of large-scale monitoring efforts: Sampling design and data analysis issues. Pages 69–90 in S.L. Loeb and A. Spacie, editors. Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar

Chernick, M.R. 1983. Influence functions, outlier detection, and data editing. Pages 167–176 in T. Wright, editor. Statistical Methods and the Improvement of Data Quality. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar

Church, M.R., K.W Thornton, P.W. Shaffer, D.L. Stevens, B.P. Rochelle, G.R. Holdren, M.G. Johnson, J.J. Lee, R.S. Turner, D.L. Cassell, D.A. Lammers, W.G. Campbell, C.I. Liff, C.C. Brandt, L.H. Liegel, G.D. Bishop, D.C. Mortenson, S.M. Pierson, and D.D. Schmoyer. 1989. Direct/Delayed Response Project: Future Effects of Long-Term Sulfur Deposition on Surface Water Chemistry in the Northeast and Southern Blue Ridge Province. 1989. EPA/600/3-89/061 a-d. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar

Cressie, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

D’Erchia, F. 1997. Geographic information systems and remote sensing applications for ecosystem management. Pages 201–225 in M.S. Boyce and A. Haney, editors. Ecosystem Management: Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.Google Scholar

Fayerweather, W.E., S.L. Tirey, J.K. Baldwin, and B.K. Hoover. 1991. Issues in data sharing and access: An industry perspective. Journal of Occupational Medicine 33:1253–1256.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Feist, B.E., E.A. Steel, G.R. Pess, and R.E. Bilby. What is the correct scale for habitat analyses aimed at prioritizing restoration efforts for salmon? Conservation Biology (submitted).Google Scholar

Forman, R.T.T. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

Fosnight, E.A. and D. Greenlee. 2000. Map data in support of forest management. Journal of Forestry 98:50–52.Google Scholar

Fürbinger, J.M. and A.C. Roulet. 1994. Sensitivity analysis, an unavoidable step in the evaluation of simulation program. Presented at European Conference on Energy Performance and Indoor Climate in Building, Lyon, France, 24–26 November, 1994.Google Scholar

Gerrard, R., P. Stine, R. Church, and M. Gilpin. 2001. Habitat evaluation using GIS: A case study applied to the San Joaquin kit fox. Landscape and Urban Planning 52:239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, W.R. and J.D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of temporal variability of survival in animal populations. Ecology 79:2531–2538.Google Scholar

Green, K. 2000. Selecting and interpreting high-resolution images. Journal of Forestry 98:37–39.Google Scholar

Guisan, A. and N.E. Zimmerman. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modeling 135:147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilborn, R. and M. Mangel. 1997. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar

Johnson, K.N., F. Swanson, M. Herring, and S. Greene. 1999. Bioregional Assessments. Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar

Kirk, R.E. 1995. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California, USA.Google Scholar

Kish, L. 1995. Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

Knick, S.T. and D.L. Dyer. 1997. Distribution of black-tailed jackrabbit habitat determined by GIS in southwestern Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:75–85.Google Scholar

Lachowski, H., P. Maus, and N. Roller. 2000. From pixels to decisions: Digital remote sensing technologies for public land managers. Journal of Forestry 98:13–15.Google Scholar

Landres, P.B., J. Verner, and J.W. Thomas. 1988. Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: A critique. Conservation Biology 2:316–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littell, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, and R.D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS System for Mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar

Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin. 1983. Missing data in large data sets. Pages 73–82 in T. Wright, editor. Statistical methods and the improvement of data quality. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar

Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

Mann, L.K., A.W. King, V.H. Dale, W.W. Hargrove, R.A. Washington-Allen, L.R. Pounds, and T.L. Ashwood. 1999. The role of soil classification in GIS modeling of habitat pattern: Threatened calcareous ecosystems. Ecosystems 2:524–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macilwain, C. 1996. Researchers resist copyright laws that could endanger data access. Nature 383:653.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Macilwain, C. 1999. US university fears allayed over access to research data. Nature 401:732.PubMedGoogle Scholar

National Research Council (NRC). 1990. Managing Troubled Waters: Role of Marine Environmental Monitoring. National Academy Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar

National Research Council (NRC). 1995. Review of EPA’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Overall Evaluation. National Academy Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar

Noon, B.R., T.A. Spies, and M.G. Raphael. 1999. Conceptual basis for designing an effectiveness monitoring program in the strategy and design of the effectiveness monitoring program for the Northwest Forest Plan. Pages 21–48 in B.S. Mulder, B.R. Noon, T.A. Spies, M.G. Raphael, C.J. Craig, A.R. Olsen, G.H. Reeves, and H.H. Welsh, editors. The Strategy and Design of the Effectiveness Monitoring Program for the Northwest Forest Plan. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-437. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar

Overton, W.S., D. White, and D.L. Stevens. 1990. Design report for EMAP-Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. EPA/600/3-91/053. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar

Palmer, C.J., K.H. Riitters, T. Strickland, D.L. Cassell, and G.E. Byers. 1992. Monitoring and Research Strategy for Forests-Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP), volume 1. EPA/600/4-91/012. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.Google Scholar

Platt, J.R. 1964. Strong inference. Science 146:347–353.Google Scholar

Quigley, T.M. and H.B. Cole. 1997. Highlighted Scientific Findings of the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-404. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar

Riitters, K., M. Papp, D. Cassell, and J. Hazard, editors. 1991. Forest Health Monitoring Plot Design and Logistics Study. EPA/600/S3-91/051. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar

Robinson, A.H., R.D. Sale, J.L. Morrison, and P.C. Muehrcke. 1984. Elements of Cartography. 5th edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

Running, S.W., L. Queen, and M. Thornton. 2000. The Earth Observing System and forest management. Journal of Forestry 98:29–31.Google Scholar

Saltelli, A., K. Chan, M. Scott, editors. 2000. Sensitivity Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

Scheaffer, R.L., W. Mendenhall, and L. Ott. 1990. Elementary Survey Sampling. 4th edition. Duxbury Press, Belmont, California, USA.Google Scholar

Starfield, A.M. 1997. A pragmatic approach to modeling for wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:261–270.Google Scholar

Stewart, A.J. and J.M. Loar. 1994. Spatial and temporal variation in biomonitoring data. Pages 91-124 in S.L. Loeb and A. Spacie, editors. Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.Google Scholar

Stewart-Oaten, A., W.W. Murdoch, and S.J. Walde. 1995. Estimation of temporal variability in populations. American Naturalist 146:519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoms, D.M., F.W. Davis, and C.B. Cogan. 1992. Sensitivity of wildlife habitat models to uncertainties in GIS data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58:843–850.Google Scholar

Van Remortel, R.D., G.E. Byers, J.E. Teberg, M.J. Miah, C.J. Palmer, M.L. Papp, M.H. Bartling, A.D. Tansey, D.L. Cassell, and P.W. Shaffer. 1988. Direct/Delayed Response Project: Quality Assurance Report for Physical and Chemical Analyses of Soils from the Southern Blue Ridge Province of the United States. EPA/600/8-88/100. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.Google Scholar

Walter, C. and E.P. Richards III. 2000. When does the Freedom of Information Act apply to privately held data produced under a federal grant? IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 19:121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, G.C. 2000. Population viability analysis: Data requirements and essential analyses. Pages 288–331 in L. Boitani and T.K. Fuller, editors. Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar

With, K.A. 1997. The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 11:1069–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar