Use of Laser and Radiofrequency for Foot and Ankle Arthroscopy

  • Marc A. Samson
  • Michael F. Dillingham
  • Gary S. Fanton
  • George ThabitIII


The application of therapeutic heat, by either holmium laser or radiofrequency, provides a safe, effective arthroscopic alternative to mechanical instrumentation for peripheral joint surgery. Their small probe sizes and fluid medium transmissibility provide significant advantages over electrocautery and other laser systems developed for biomedical applications. Developing radiofrequency technology provides a more cost-effective alternative to laser systems in most applications with similar results. As the surgeon’s ability and skill increase with time using these devices, the laser and radiofrequency devices should allow greater versatility and speed of use in the future.


Collagen Molecule Loose Body Holmium Laser Plantar Fasciitis Osteochondritis Dissecans 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Philandrianos G. Carbon dioxide laser in arthroscopic surgery of the knee. Presse Med 1985;14:2103–2104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith JB, Nance TA. Arthroscopic laser surgery. Presented at the annual meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Coronado, CA, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whipple TL, Caspari RB. Laser energy in arthroscopic meniscectomy. Orthopedics 1983;6:1165–1169.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whipple TL, Caspari RB, Meyers JF. Arthroscopic laser meniscectomy in a gas medium. Arthroscopy 1985;1:2–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whipple TL, Caspari RB, Meyers JF. Synovial response to laser induced carbon ash residue. Lasers Surg Med 1984;3:291–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whipple TL, et al. Electron microscopy of CO2 laser-induced effects in human fibrocartilage. Lasers Surg Med 1987;7:184–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lane GJ, et al. CO2 vs. holmium:YAG laser arthroscopic debridement [abstract]. In: American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, Suppl. 3, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brillhart AT. Arthroscopic laser surgery: the CO2 laser and its use. Am J Arthroscopy 1991;2:7–12.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meller M, Black H, Sherk H: Wavelength selection in laser arthroscopy. Presented at the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. San Diego, CA, April 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gruenwald JM. Fatal air embolism during arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:929.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berns MW, Nelson JR. Laser applications in biomedicine. I. Biophysics, cell biology, and biostimulation. J Laser Applications 1988;1:34–39.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fronck, J, Krakauer J, Clowell CW Jr. Effects of the Nd:YAG laser on the meniscus of the knee joint. SPIE 1990;1200:214–220.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller DV, et al. The use of contact Nd:YAG laser in arthroscopic surgery: effects on articular cartilage and meniscal tissue. Arthroscopy 1989;5:245–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Brien SJ, Miller DV. The contact neodymium yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser: a new approach to arthroscopic laser surgery. Clin Orthop 1990;252:95–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sherk HH, Killmer C. Arthroscopic surgery with a freebeam Nd:YAG laser. In: Sherk HH (ed) Lasers in orthopedics, Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1990;134–139.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fanton GS, Dillingham MF. Arthroscopic meniscectomy using the holmium:YAG laser: a double-blind study. Presented at the Arthroscopy Association of North America annual meeting, Orlando, April 1990.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fanton GS. Use of the holmium laser in arthroscopy: multiple joint applications. Presented at the Coherent Symposium on Advances in Laser Arthroscopy: New Techniques in Orthopedic Surgery, Anaheim, March 1991.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rand JA, Gaffey TA. Effect of electrocautery on fresh human articular cartilage. Arthroscopy 1985;1:242–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nishioka NS, Damankevitz Y. Reflectance during pulsed holmium laser irradiation of tissue. Lasers Surg Med 1989;9:375–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trauner K, Nishioka N, Patel D. Pulsed holmium yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser ablation of fibrocartilage and articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med 1990;18:316–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    VanLeeuwen TG, et al. Non-contact tissue ablation by holmium:YAG laser pulses in blood. Lasers Surg Med 1991;11:24–26.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nishioka, et al. Ablation of rabbit liver, stomach and colon with pulsed holmium laser. Gastroenterology 1989;96:831–837.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stein E, et al. Acute and chronic effects of bone ablation with a pulsed holmium laser. Lasers Surg Med 1990;10:384–388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vari SG, et al. Ablation study of the knee structure tissues with a Ho:YAG laser. Am Soc Laser Med Surg 1991 (Suppl 3) (abstr).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lane GJ, Mooar PA. Holmium: YAG laser arthroscopic debridement [abstract]. In: American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery. Suppl. 3, 1991.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berns MW. Laser surgery. Sci Am 1991;264:85–90.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Decklebaum, et al. Reduction of laser-induced pathologic tissue injury using pulsed energy delivery. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:662–667.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hobbs ER, et al. Superpulsed lasers: minimizing thermal damage with short duration, high irradiance pulses. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1987;13:955–964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walsh JT Jr, et al. Pulsed CO2 laser tissue ablation: effect of tissue type and pulse duration on thermal damage. Laser Surg Med 1988;8:108–118.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reagan BF, McInerny VK, Treadwell BV, et al. Irrigation solutions for arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:624–631.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zangger P, Gerber BE. Use of the laser in arthroscopy of the ankle: indications, method, first results. Orthopade 1996;25:73–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tanzer ML. Cross-linking of collagen-endogenous aldehydes in collagen react in several ways to form a variety of unique covalent cross-links. Science 1973;180:561–566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Birk DE, Silver FH, Trelstad RL. Matrix assembly. In: Hay ED (ed) Cell biology of extracellular matrix, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum, 1991;221.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Flory PL. Role of crystallization in polymers and proteins. Science 1956;124:53–60.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gustavson KH. The chemistry and reactivity of collagen. San Diego: Academic, 1956.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lennox FG. Shrinkage of collagen. Biochim Biophys Acta 1949;3:170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hayashi K, Nieckarz JA, Thabitt G III, et al. Effect of nonablative laser energy on the joint capsule: an in vivo rabbit study using a holmium:YAG laser. Laser Surg Med 1997;20:164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wall MS, et al. Thermal modification of collagen. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:339–344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weir CE. Rate of shrinkage of tendon collagen-heat, entropy and free energy of activation of the shrinkage of untreated tendon; effect of acid salt, pickle, and tannage on the activation of tendon collagen. J Am Leather Chem Assoc 1949;44:108–138.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc A. Samson
  • Michael F. Dillingham
  • Gary S. Fanton
  • George ThabitIII

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations