Advertisement

Endoscopic Laser Foraminoplasty: A Treatment Concept and Two-Year Outcome Analysis

  • M.T.N. Knight
  • A.K.D. Goswami
Chapter
  • 135 Downloads

Conclusions

This series of endoscopic laser foraminoplasties represents the initial attempt to address degenerative disc disease of the spine, lateral recess syndrome, and failed back surgery as a complex of multiple sources of pain production. That so little tissue handling could do so much to so many who had no alternatives available brings into focus once again our lack of understanding of back pain and our persistent overkill, relying on major potentially damaging surgical procedures such as instrumented or noninstrumented fusions to treat such pathology. The principal cause for the failure of conventional spinal surgery is attributed to “operating on the wrong level.”18 Viviprudence and endoscopy in-dicate that the cause of failure is in reality a failure to identify not only the level, but the pain site in the level.

Keywords

Back Pain Facet Joint Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Degenerative Disc Disease Visual Analogue Pain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nettelbladt E. Antalet reumatikerinvalder I Sverige under en 30-arsperiod. OPMEAR 1985;30:54–56.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Report of the Commission on the Evaluation of Pain. Soc Security Bull 1987;50:13–44.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nachemson A. Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain. Orthopaedics 1985;9:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hijikata S, Yamagishi M, Nakayama T, et al. Percutaneous discectomy: a new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. J Toden Hosp 1975;5:5–13.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kambin P, Casey K, O’Brien E, Zhou L. Transforminal arthroscopic foraminal decompression of lateral recess stenosis. J Neurosurg 1996;84:462–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simpson JM. Indication for laser surgery in the treatment of degenerative disk disease of the lumbar spine. J South Orthop Assoc 1996;5:174–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choy DS, Michelsen J, Getrajdman G, Diwan S. Percutaneous laser disc decompression: an update-spring 1992. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1992;10:177–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knight MTN. Laser-assisted percutaneous and endoscopic lumbar discectomy. In: Ramini PS, ed. Textbook of Spinal Surgery. Mumbai, India: Department of Neurology and Spinal Surgery; 1996:449–454.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knight MTN, Pantoja S. KTP/532. Percutaneous laser disc decompression for lumbar disc prolapse. Clin Neurosci 1996;49:330–336.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knight MTN, Vajda A, Jakab GV, Awan S. Endoscopic laser foraminoplasty on the lumbar spine—early experience. Minimally Invasive Neurosurg 1998;41:5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kushlick SD, Ijlstron CL, Michael CJ. The tissue origin of low back pain: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22:181–187.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Almay BGL, Johansson F, Von Knorring L, et al. Substance P in CSF of patients with chronic pain syndromes. Pain 1988;33:3–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rydevik B, Brown MD, Lundborg G. Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine 1984;9:7–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spitzer WO, LeBlank FE, Dupuis M, et al. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related disorders: a monograph for clinicians. Report at Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 1987;12(suppl):S1–S59.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnsson K, Willner S. Postoperative instability after decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1986;11:107–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goswami A. Laminotomy versus Laminectomy: Is There a Difference in Stability? A Biomechanical Study on Cadaveric Spines. Thesis: MCh (Orth) Liverpool, UK: University of Liverpool; 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parke WW, Watnabe R. The intrinsic vasculature of the lumbosacral spine nerve roots. Spine 1985;10:508–515.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCulloch J. Complications of lumbar microdiscectomy. Acta Orthop Belg 1987;53:272–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.T.N. Knight
  • A.K.D. Goswami

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations