Skip to main content

Content and Presentation Adaptation in Hypermedia Systems

  • Chapter
Intelligent Integrated Media Communication Techniques

Abstract

The present chapter is dedicated to personalised real-time multimedia communication services. The challenge of modern communication services is a combination of personalised information gathering and customised data retrieval technology. A concept of personalised communication service is presented, followed by an overview of information search, retrieval and adaptive presentation technologies. Both generalised strategies and supporting technologies are presented throughout the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Weibel, J. Kunze, C. Lagoze, and M. Wolf, “The Dublin Core initiative home page.” http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2413.txt, September 1998.

  2. G. N. Venkat, R. V. Vijay, G. I. William, and K. Rajesh, “Information retrieval on the World Wide Web,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 58–68, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Pretchner, “Ontology based personalised search,” Master’s thesis, USA, State of Kansas, Lawrence, University of Kansas, Faculty of the graduate school, Departement of electrical engineering, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Edwards, D. Bayer, C. L. Green, and T. R. Payne, “Experience with learning agents which manage Internet-based information,” in AAAI 1996 Stanford Spring Symposium on Machine Learning in Information Access, Stanford, California, USA (M. A. Hearst and H. Hirsh, eds.), pp. 31–40, AAAI, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Salton and M. J. McGill, An introduction to modern information retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Aas, “A survey on personalised information filtering systems in the world wide web,” Tech. Rep. 922, Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway, December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. B. Palmer, “The semantic web: An introduction.” http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro. Last accessed in Jan. 2003.

  8. A. Swartz, “The semantic web in breadth.” http://logicerror.com/SemanticWeb-long. Last accessed in Jan 2003.

  9. M. Flickner et al., “Query by image and video content: The QBIC system,” Computer Magazine IEEE, vol. 28, pp. 23–32, September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. Martínez, “Overview of the MPEG-7 standard (version 6.0), ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11-coding of moving pictures and audio.” http://mpeg.telecomitalialab.com/standards/mpeg-7/mpeg-7.htm, December 2001.

  11. S. Chang, J. R. Smith, H. J. Meng, H. Wang, and D. Zhong, “Finding images/video in large archives,” D-Lib Magazine, vol. 3, February 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Vasconcelos and A. Lippman, “Embeded mixture modeling for efficient probabilistic content-based indexing and retrieval,” in SPIE Multimedia Storage and Archiving Systems III, vol. 3527, pp. 134–143, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Belongie, C. Carson, H. Greenspan, and J. Malik, “Color-and texture-based image segmentation using em and its application to content-based image retrieval,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision, (Bombay, India), pp. 675–682, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. J. Posnak, G. Lavender, and M. Harrick, “An adaptive framework for developing multimedia software components,” Communications of the ACM, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Shah and A. Sheth, “Infoharness: Managing distributed heterogeneous information,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 3, pp. 18–28, November-December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. X. Zhu, H. Zhang, and L. Wu, “New query refinement and semantics integrated image retrieval system with semiautomatic annotation scheme,” Journal of electronic imaging, vol. 10, pp. 850–860, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Benitez, J. Smith, and S. Chang, “Medianet: A multimedia information network for knowledge representation,” in Proceedings of SPIE (J. Smith, C. Le, S. Panchanathan, and C. Kuo, eds.), vol. 4210, pp. 1–12, October 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. A. Miller, “WordNet: A lexical database for English,” Proceedings of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 39–41, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. U. Srinivasan and G. Riessen, “A video data model for content based search,” in 8th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’ 97), (Toulouse, France), p. 178, September 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Faudemay and C. Seyrat, “Intelligent delivery of personalised video programmes from a video database,” in 8th International workshop on database and expert systems applications (DEXA97), (Toulouse, France), p. 172, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Amato, G. Mainetto, and P. Savino, “An approach to a content-based retrieval of multimedia data,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–36, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Anhanger and D. C. Little, “Data semantics for improving performance of digital news video system,” IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, vol. 13, pp. 352–360, May-June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Pogačnik and J.F. Tasič, “Interactive and personalised television of the future,” in Proceedings of the First COST 276 workshop on Information and Knowledge Management for Integrated Media Communication (CDROM), (Florence, Italy), October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  24. http://www.tv-anytime.org.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sambits Consortium, “The usage of MPEG-7 metadata in a broadcast application,” 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Turpeinen, “Agent mediated personalised multimedia services,” Master’s thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Brusilovsky, Adaptive hypermedia, User modeling and user adapted interaction, pp. 87–110. Kluwer Academic publishers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Pazzani and D. Billsus, “Learning and revising user profiles: The identification of interesting web sites,” Machine Learning, vol. 27, pp. 313–331, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Mladenić, “Personal webwatcher: Implementation and design,” Tech. Rep. IJS-DP-7472, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. Crabtree and S. J. Soltysiak, “Identifying and tracking changing interests,” International journal of digital libraries, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38–53, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. Billsus and M. J. Pazzani, “A hybrid user model for news story classification,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on User Modeling (UM99), (Banff, Canada), pp. 99–108, Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Stefani and C. Strapparava, “Personalizing access to Web sites: The SitelF project,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia HYPERTEXT’98, (Pittsburg, USA), pp. 69–74, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Mirković et al., “Genetic algorithms for intelligent internet search.” B.Sc. thesis, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. Sheth, “A learning approach to personalized information filtering,” Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Konstan, B. Miller, D. Maltz, J. Herlocker, L. Gordon, and J. Riedl, “Grouplens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 77–87, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. T. Malone, K. Grant, and F. Turbak, “Intelligent information sharing systems,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 30, pp. 390–402, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  37. P. Cotter and B. Smyth, “PTV: Intelligent personalised TV guides,” in Proceedings of the 12th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-2000) Conference, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 957–964, AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  38. “TiVo.” http://www.tivo.com. Last accessed in Jan. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  39. “ReplayTV.” http://www.replaytv.com. Last accessed in Jan. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. Spainhour and R. Eckstein, Webmaster in a nutshell, Second edition. 101 Morris Street, Sebastopol, CA, US: O’Reilly & Associates, Inc., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. J. Clarke, Transform Coding of Images. London: Academic Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. J. Clarke, Digital Compression of Still Images and Video. London: Academic Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  43. K. R. Rao and J. J. Hwang, Techniques and Standards for Image Video and Audio Coding. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  44. ISO/IEC,“TC1 10918-1 ITU-T REC.T.81 information technology: Digital compression and coding of continuous-time still images: requirements and guidelines,” 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  45. ISO/IEC, “11172-5 information technology: Coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to about 1 Mbit/s: Part1: Systems; part 2: Video; part 3: Audio; part4: Conformance testing,” 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  46. ISO/IEC, “JTC1/SC29/WG11: preliminary working draft MPEG 92/086 document AVC-212,” 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. Vetterli and J. Kovačević, Wavelets and Subband Coding. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. N. S. Jayant and P. Noll, Digital Coding of Waveforms. Prentice Hall, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. A. Webster et al., “An objective video quality assessment system based on human perception,” in Proceedings of SPIE, Human Vision, Visual Processing and Digital Display, vol. 1913, (San Jose, California, USA), pp. 15–26, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  50. W. Xu and G. Hauske., “Picture quality evaluation based on error segmentation,” in Proceedings of SPIE, Visual Communications and Image Processing, vol. 2308, (Chicago, IL, USA), pp. 1454–1465, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Miyahara, K. Kotani, and V. R. Algazi, “Objective picture quality scale (PQS) for image coding,” tech. rep., Technical Center for Image Processing and Integrated Computing, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  52. A. B. Watson, “DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images,” in Proceedings of SPIE, Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, (San Jose, CA, USA), pp. 202–216, February 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Shah, D. Staddon, I. Rubin, and A. Ratkovic., “Multimedia over FDDI,” in Proceedings of 17th Conference on Local Computer Networks, (Mineapolis, USA), pp. 110–124, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  54. C. Partridge, Gigabit Networking. Reading, MA: Adison Wesley, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. G. Karlsson, “Video over ATM networks.” http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/15810.html, 1997.

  56. J. Nielson, Usability Engineering. Boston, US: AP Professional Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  57. N. T. Bhatti, A. Bouch, and A. Kuchinsky, “Integrating user-perceived quality into web server design,” WWW9 / Computer Networks, vol. 33, no. 1–6, pp. 1–16, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  58. U. Burnik, Optimalno kodiranje za prenos slik po ozkopasovnih prenosnih medijih (Optimal encoding for image transmission over narrowband communication media). PhD thesis, Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za elektrotehniko, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  59. D. Westen, Psychology: mind, brain & culture. US: John Wiley & Sons, 2nd ed., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  60. I. Akoulchina and J.-G. Ganascia, “SATELIT-Agent: An adaptive interface based on learning interface agents technology,” in User Modeling: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, UM97 (A, Jameson, C. Paris, and C. Tasso, eds.), (Vienna, New York), pp. 21–32, Springer Wien New York, 1997. Available from http://um.org.

  61. J. Orwant, “For want of a bit the user was lost: Cheap user modeling,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 398–416, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. G. Kiczales and X. Pare, “Beyond the black box: Open implementation,” IEEE Software, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 8–11, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. B. Kerherve, A. Pons, G. V. Bochmann, and A. Hafid, “Metadata modeling for quality of service management in distributed multimedia systems,” in Proceedings of the First IEEE Metadata Conference, (Silver Spring, Maryland, USA), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  64. U. Burnik and J. F. Tasič, “Network optimisation for remote multimedia imaging applications,” in Proceedings of COST #254 Workshop, (Toulouse, France), pp. 147–151, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  65. U. Burnik and J. F. Tasič, “Efficient image-intensive communication system supporting personalised user requirements,” in Proceedings of X European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2000) CD-ROM, vol. 1, (Tampere, Finland), September 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burnik, U., Pogačnik, M. (2003). Content and Presentation Adaptation in Hypermedia Systems. In: Tasič, J.F., Najim, M., Ansorge, M. (eds) Intelligent Integrated Media Communication Techniques. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48718-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48718-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7552-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48718-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics