Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychophysical Measurement of Human Taste Experience

  • Chapter
Neurobiology of Food and Fluid Intake

Part of the book series: Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology ((HBNE,volume 14))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aitken, R. C. B. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 62, 989–993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, R. C. B., Ferres, H. M., & Gedye, J. L. (1963). Distraction from flashing lights. Aerospace Medicine, 34, 302–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M. (1979). Bitter taste of saccharin: Related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Science, 205, 934–935.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M. (1991). Sweetness: History, preference, and genetic variability. Food Technology, 45, 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M. (1993a). The biological basis of food perception and acceptance. Food Quality and Preference, 4, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M. (1993b). Genetic and pathological taste variation: What can we learn from animal models and human disease? In D. Chadwick, J. Marsh, & J. Goode (Eds.), The molecular basis of smell and taste transduction (Ciba Foundation Symposium 179, pp. 251–267). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M. (2000). Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: Recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chemical Senses, 25, 447–460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., Green, B. G., Kveton, J., Lucchina, L. A. et al. (1999). Sensory variability, food preferences and BMI in non-, medium and supertasters. Appetite, 33, 228–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., Green, B. G., Prutkin, J. M., & Snyder, D. J. (2002). Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: What we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Quality and Preference, 14, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., Green, B. G., & Snyder, D. J. (2002). Hormones, age, genes and pathology: How do we assess variation in sensation and preference? In H. Anderson, J. Blundell, & M. Chiva (Eds.), Food selection: From genes to culture (pp. 173–187). Paris: Danone Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., & Snyder, D. J. (2004). Genetic differences in human oral perception: Advanced methods reveal basic problems in intensity scaling. In J. Prescott & B. J. Tepper (Eds.), Genetic variations in taste sensitivity (pp. 1–41). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Lucchina, L. A., Prutkin, J. M., & Fast, K. (1998). PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) supertasters and the saltiness of NaCl. In C. Murphy (Ed.), Olfaction and taste XII (NYAS Vol. 855, pp. 793–796). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., & Miller, I. J. (1994). PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiology and Behavior, 56, 1165–1171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Fast, K., Karrer, T. A., Marino, S., Price, R. A., & Reed, D. A. (1992). PROP supertasters and the perception of sweetness and bitterness. Chemical Senses, 17, 594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Green, B. G., Snyder, D. J., Lucchina, L. A., Hoffman, H. J., Weiffenbach, J. M. et al., (2000). Valid across-group comparisons: Supertasters perceive the most intense taste sensations by magnitude matching or the LMS scale. Chemical Senses, 25, 639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Rifkin, B., Marks, L. E., & Hooper, J. E. (1988). Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: Related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP. Chemical Senses, 13, 517–528.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). How to show that 9 &τ; 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design. Psychological Methods, 4, 243–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F., & Fox, A. L. (1932). Our different taste worlds. Journal of Heredity, 23, 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F., & Salmon, M. R. (1931). Odor and taste blindness. Eugenical News, 16, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, G. (1961). Interindividual scaling and perception of muscular force. Kungl. Fysiografiska Sällskapets I Lund Förhandlingar, 31, 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, G. (1982). A category scale with ratio properties for intermodal and interindividual comparisons. In H. G. Geissler & P. Petzold (Eds.), Psychophysical judgment and the process of perception (pp. 25–34). Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, G. (1990). Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment, and Health, 16(Suppl. 1), 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapo, A. K., Bartoshuk, L. M., Peterson, J. M., Phillips, M. N., & Duffy, V. B. (2001). Salt intensity and behaviors: Associations with bitterness of 6-n-propylthiouracil. Chemical Senses, 26, 1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapo, A. K., Phillips, M. N., Ilich, J. Z., & Duffy, V. B. (2001). Sodium chloride (NaCl) saltiness: Are older females more responsive? [Special issue 1]. The Gerontologist, 41, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, J., & Hawrysh, Z. J. (1988). Suprathreshold sour taste intensity and pleasantness perception with age. Physiology and Behavior, 43, 601–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. R. F., & Spear, F. G. (1964). Reliability and sensitivity in the self-assessment of well-being. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 17, 18A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, A., Henderson, S. A., & Shore, A. B. (1997). Taste responses to naringin, a flavonoid, and the acceptance of grapefruit juice are related to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 66, 391–397.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, A., Henderson, S. A., Shore, A. B., & Barratt-Fornell, A. (1997). Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet. Physiology and Behavior, 62, 649–655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, V. B., Bartoshuk, L. M., Lucchina, L. A., Snyder, D. J., & Tym, A. (1996). Supertasters of PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) rate the highest creaminess to high-fat milk products. Chemical Senses, 21, 598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., Cohen, Z., Chodos, E., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (1999). Genetic taste status associates with fat food acceptance and body mass index in adults. Chemical Senses, 24, 545–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, V. B., Lucchina, L. A., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (2004). Genetic variation in taste: Potential biomarker for cardiovascular risk. In J. Prescott & B. J. Tepper (Eds.), Genetic variation in taste sensitivity (pp. 195–227). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, V. B., & Peterson, J. M. (2000). Genetic variation in taste: Associations with alcohol sensation and intake. Chemical Senses, 25, 638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, V. B., Phillips, M. N., Peterson, J. M., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (2001). Bitterness of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) associates with bitter sensations and intake of vegetables. Appetite, 37, 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T. (1972). Psychophysics. I: Discrimination and detection. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth & Schlossberg’s experimental psychology, Vol. 1. Sensation and perception (pp. 11–46). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast, K. (2004). A scale to measure just about anything. Unpublished thesis, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast, K., Green, B. G., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (2002). Developing a scale to measure just about anything: Comparisons across groups and individuals. Appetite, 39, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast, K., Green, B. G., Snyder, D. J., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (2001). Remembered intensities of taste and oral burn correlate with PROP bitterness. Chemical Senses, 26, 1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G. (1966). Elements of psychophysics (Vol. 1) (H. E. Adler, Trans.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work published 1860)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. (1967). Genetics and gustatory chemoreception in man and other primates. In M. R. Kare & O. Maller (Eds.), The chemical senses and nutrition (pp. 621–681). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. L. (1931). Six in ten “tasteblind” to bitter chemical. Science News Letter, 9, 249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gent, J. F., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (1983). Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. Chemical Senses, 7, 265–272.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gescheider, G. A. (1988). Psychophysical scaling. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 169–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gracely, R. H., McGrath, P., & Dubner, R. (1978). Ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors. Pain, 5, 5–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. G., Shaffer, G. S., & Gilmore, M. M. (1993). A semantically-labeled magnitude scale of oral sensation with apparent ratio properties. Chemical Senses, 18, 683–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakel, M. D. (1968). How often is often? American Psychologist, 23, 533–534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. J., Bartoshuk, L. M., Cain, W. S., & Stevens, J. C. (1975). PTC taste blindness and the taste of caffeine. Nature, 253, 442–443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H., & Kalmus, H. (1949). The measurement of taste sensitivity to phenylthiourea (PTC). Annals of Eugenics, 15, 24–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S., & Patterson, D. G. (1921). Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin 18, 98–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heft, M. W., & Parker, S. R. (1984). An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain. Pain, 19, 153–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M. M., & Rolls, B. J. (1987). Methods of investigating human eating behavior. In F. M. Toates & N. E. Rowland (Eds.), Feeding and drinking (pp. 77–109). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. V., Peryam, D. R., & Thurstone, L. L. (1955). Development of a scale for measuring soldier’s food preferences. Food Research, 20, 512–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karrer, T., & Bartoshuk, L. (1991). Capsaicin desensitization and recovery on the human tongue. Physiology and Behavior, 49, 757–764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kast, E. C. (1962). The measurement of pain: A new approach to an old problem. Journal of New Drugs, 2, 344–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, A., Barnett, G. O., Mosteller, F., & Youtz, C (1986). How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. New England Journal of Medicine, 315, 740–744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna, L. (1960). The clinical measurement of pain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 86, 28–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T. (1980). A comparison of different methods used to assess sensitivity to the taste of phenylthiocarbamide (PTC). Chemical Senses, 5, 247–256.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapes, R. E. A. (1979). Verbal and numerical estimates of probability in therapeutic contexts. Social Science & Medicine, 13A, 277–282.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marino, S., Bartoshuk, L. M., Monaco, J., Anliker, J. A., Reed, D., & Desnoyers, S. (1991). PTC/PROP and the tastes of milk products. Chemical Senses, 16, 551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L. E., & Stevens, J. C. (1980). Measuring sensation in the aged. In L. W. Poon (Ed.), Aging in the 1980’s: Psychological issues (pp. 592–598). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBurney, D. H., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (1973). Interactions between stimuli with different taste qualities. Physiology and Behavior, 10, 1101–1106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, H. R. (1977). Magnitude estimation: Notes on what, how, when, and why to use it. Journal of Food Quality, 1, 195–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, H. R., & Chandler, J. W. (1977). New uses of magnitude estimation. In G. G. Birch, J. G. Brennan, & K. J. Parker (Eds.), Sensory properties of foods (pp. 189–211). London: Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narens, L., & Luce, R. D. (1983). How we may have been misled into believing in the interpersonal comparability of utility. Theory and Decision, 15, 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407–418.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, R. E. (1966). The application of thymometry to the measurement of anxiety. International Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 2, 337–341.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, R. E. (1967). A precise technique for the measurement of pain. Headache, 6, 189–194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peryam, D. R., & Girardot, N. F. (1952). Advanced taste test method. Food Engineering, 24, 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. M., Bartoshuk, L. M., & Duffy, V. B. (1999). Intensity and preference for sweetness influenced by genetic taste variation. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99(Suppl.), A28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. M., & Duffy, V. B. (2000). Genetic variation in taste: Associations with sweetness intensity, sweet liking and sweet food acceptance. Chemical Senses, 25, 638–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. N., Bartoshuk, L. M., Peterson, J. M., & Duffy, V. B. (2001). 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness: Associations with creamy sensations, preference for and intake of high fat foods. Chemical Senses, 26, 1040–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, J., Johnstone, V., & Munro, P. (2001). Discriminability of fat content as a function of PROP sensitivity. Chemical Senses, 26, 800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, J., & Swain-Campbell, N. (2000). Responses to repeated oral irritation by capsaicin, cinnamaldehyde, and ethanol in PROP tasters and non-tasters. Chemical Senses, 25, 239–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prutkin, J. M. (1997). PROP tasting and chemesthesis. Unpublished senior essay, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutkin, J. M., Duffy, V. B., Etter, L., Fast, K., Gardner, E., Lucchina, L. A. et al. (2000). Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiology and Behavior, 69, 161–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prutkin, J. M., Fast, K., Lucchina, L. A., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (1999). PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) genetics and trigeminal innervation of fungiform papillae. Chemical Senses, 24, 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. R., Li, X., Chen, Z., Mascioli, K., Bachmanov, A. A., Beauchamp, G. K. et al. (2002). Alleles of the putative taste receptor TAS1R3 may influence the pleasantness of sucrose and aspartame in human subjects. Obesity Research, 10, 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, J., & Joffe, C. H. (Producers), Allen, W. (Director). (1977). Annie Hall [Film]. Los Angeles: MGM/United Artists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Frijters, J. E. R. (1991). The perception of the taste of KCl, NaCl, and quinine HCl is not related to PROP-sensitivity. Chemical Senses, 16, 303–317.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, H. G., & Cardello, A. V. (2001). A labeled affective magnitude (LAM) scale for assessing food liking/disliking. Journal of Sensory Studies, 16, 117–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, J. T., & Stunkard, A. J. (1968). The anorectic effect of dexamphetamine sulphate. British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, 33, 513–522.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. H. (1944). The specific meanings of certain terms indicating differing degrees of frequency. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 30, 328–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. J. (1995). Testing the green scale: An analysis of PROP taste classification and the association of capsaicin. Unpublished senior essay, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. J., Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., Hoffman, H. J., Ko, C. W., Weiffenbach, J. M. et al. (2001). Food preferences vary with age and sex: A new analysis using the general Labeled Magnitude Scale. Chemical Senses, 26, 1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. J., Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., Weiffenbach, J. M., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (2001). PROP genetics interact with age and sex to influence food preferences. Appetite, 37, 164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. J., Lucchina, L. A., Duffy, V. B., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (1996). Magnitude matching adds power to the labeled magnitude scale. Chemical Senses, 21, 673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. H. (1931). Inherited taste deficiency. Science, 74, 151–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C. (1959). Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 201–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., & Marks, L. E. (1965). Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 54, 407–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., & Marks, L. E. (1980). Cross-modality matching functions generated by magnitude estimation. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 379–389.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1958). Adaptation-level vs. the relativity of judgment. The American Journal of Psychology, 4, 633–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teghtsoonian, R. (1973). Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens’ Law. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 3–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J., & Nurse, R. J. (1997). Fat perception is related to PROP taster status. Physiology and Behavior, 61, 949–954.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1995). AA review of human linguistic probability processing: General principles and empirical evidence. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., Zwick, R., & Forsyth, B. (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 348–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yackinous, C., & Guinard, J. X. (2001). Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction. Physiology and Behavior, 72, 427–437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zoeke, B., & Sarris, V. (1983). A comparison of ‘frame of reference’ paradigms in human and animal psychophysics. In H.-G. Geissler, J. F. J. M. Buffant, E. L. J. Leeuwenburg, & V. Sarris (Eds.), Modern issues in perception (pp. 283–317). Berlin, Germany: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520-8041

    Linda M. Bartoshuk & Derek J. Snyder

Authors
  1. Linda M. Bartoshuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Derek J. Snyder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

    Edward M. Stricker

  2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

    Stephen C. Woods

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartoshuk, L.M., Snyder, D.J. (2004). Psychophysical Measurement of Human Taste Experience. In: Stricker, E.M., Woods, S.C. (eds) Neurobiology of Food and Fluid Intake. Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, vol 14. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48643-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48643-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-48484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48643-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation