Skip to main content

Review of Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Limb-sparing Surgery

  • Chapter
Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery

Overview

Endoprosthetic replacement of segmental skeletal defects is the preferred technique of reconstruction after resection of bone sarcomas. Today, all of the major anatomic joints with their adjacent segmental bone can be reconstructed safely and reliably with a modular endoprosthetic replacement. Prosthetic reconstruction is routinely performed for the proximal femur, distal femur, total femur, proximal tibia, proximal humerus, and scapula. Allografts are rarely used.

A major advantage of a modular endoprosthetic system is intraoperative flexibility; it enables the surgeon to reconstruct defects of any size with minimal preoperative planning. Instead of performing a resection to match a prosthesis customized on the basis of imaging studies that are 4–8 weeks old, the surgeon can concentrate on performing the best possible resection indicated for the patient at the time of surgery. Overall survival analysis of large segmental replacements is approximately 90% at 10 years (reported at 98% for the proximal humerus and 90% for the distal femur).

This chapter reviews the indications and techniques for performing endoprosthetic replacements for bone tumors. Many of the described surgical techniques were developed by the senior author, placing emphasis on techniques for reconstructing the soft tissues after implantation of a modular endoprosthesis to optimize the functional outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Enneking WF. Clinical Musculoskeletal Pathology. Gainesville: University Press of Florida; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gebhardt MC, Flugstad DI, Springfield DS, Mankin HJ. The use of bone allografts for limb salvage in high-grade extremity sarcomas. Clin Orthop. 1991;270: 181–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hejna MJ, Gitelis S. Allograft prosthetic composite reconstruction for bone tumors. Sem Surg Oncol. 1997;13: 18–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marcove RC, Lewis MM, Rosen G et al. Total femur and total knee replacement. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop. 1977;126:147–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Capanna R, Morris HG, Campanacci D et al. Modular uncemented prosthetic reconstruction after resection of tumours of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76B: 178–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aboulafia AJ, Buch R, Mathews J, Li W, Malawer MM. Reconstruction using the saddle prosthesis following excision of primary and metastatic periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop. 1995;314:203–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ward WG, Johnson KS, Dorey FJ, Eckardt JJ. Extra-medullary porous coating to prevent diaphyseal osteolysis and radiolucent lines around proximal tibial replacements. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75A:976–87.

    Google Scholar 

  8. An K, Chao EYS, Kaufman KR. Analysis of muscle and joint loads. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC, editors. Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics, 2nd edn. New York: Lippincott Raven; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andriacchi TP, Natarajan RN, Hurwitz DE. Musculoskeletal dynamics, locomotion and clinical applications. In: Mow VC, Hayes WC, editors. Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics, 2nd edn. New York: Lippincott Raven; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henshaw RM, Malawer MM. Survival of modular versus custom endoprostheses for limb salvage: are we actually doing better? Presented at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1998 Annual Meeting — Scientific Program; Paper No. 157, 20 March 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malawer MM, Canfield D, Meller I. Porous-coated segmental prosthesis for large tumor defects. A prosthesis based upon immediate fixation (PMMA) and extracortical bone fixation. In: Yamamuro T, editor. New Developments for Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Tumors. New York: Springer; 1989:247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malawer MM. Tumors of the shoulder girdle. Technique of resection and description of a surgical classification. Orthop Clin N Am. 1991; 22:7–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Malawer MM, Price WM. Gastrocnemius transposition flap in conjunction with limb-sparing surgery for primary bone sarcomas around the knee. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73:741.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rougraff BT, Simon MA, Kneisl JS, Greenberg DB, Mankin HJ. Limb salvage compared with amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur: a long-term oncological, functional, and quality of life study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76:649.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts P, Chan D, Gimer RJ, Sneath RS, Scales JT. Prosthetic replacement of the distal femur for primary bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73B:762.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horowitz S, Glasser D, Lane J, Healey J. Prosthetic and extremity survivorship in limb salvage: how long do the reconstructions last? Clin Orthop. 1993;293:280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malawer MM, Chou LB. Prosthetic survival and clinical results with use of large-segment replacements in the treatment of high-grade bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77A:1154–65.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Capanna R, Morris HG, Campanacci D et al. Modular uncemented prosthetic reconstruction after resection of tumours of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76B: 178–86.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Henshaw RM, Jones V, Malawer MM. Endoprosthetic reconstruction with the modular replacement system. Survival analysis of the first 100 implants with a minimum 2 year follow-up. Proceedings, Fourth Annual Combined Meeting of the American and European Musculoskeletal Tumor Societies, Washington, DC; 1998:90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henshaw, R., Malawer, M. (2004). Review of Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Limb-sparing Surgery. In: Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48407-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48407-2_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6394-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48407-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics