Conclusions
In this paper we discussed the usefulness and problems concerning the implementation of a multicentre clinical registry for Adamantiades-Behçet’s disease. Of course, this paper was written from the perspective of a statistician. Thus, the concepts described in the paper have to be filled with life by clinical experts of Adamantiades-Behçet’s disease. However, the necessity of such a registry and the benefit obtained from the cooperation of different centres is obvious and may improve patient care and research in this medical field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
International Study Group for Behçet’s disease, 1990, Criteria for Diagnosis of Behçet’s disease. Lancet 335: 1078–1080.
Zouboulis Ch.C., 1995, Habilitation thesis Adamantiades-Behçet’s disease: Clinical and experimental findings in 53 patients from the Berlin area. Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martus, P. (2004). Multicentre Clinical Registries. In: Zouboulis, C.C. (eds) Adamantiades-Behçet’s Disease. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 528. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48382-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48382-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47757-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48382-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive