Skip to main content

Simultaneous Assessment of Transcriptomic Variability and Tissue Effects in the Normal Mouse

  • Chapter
Methods of Microarray Data Analysis III

Abstract

We consider two linear mixed models for the normal mouse data [Pritchard et al., 2001]. One models the log 2 intensity measurements directly and the other models the log2 ratios. In each approach, we treat a mouse as a fixed effect, and alternatively, we also model it as a random effect to assess its variability directly. We compare the results from these mixed model approaches. The models agree that array variance is much larger than other sources of variability, but differ somewhat in their lists of genes exhibiting the most significant mouse effects. Under a Bonferroni criterion, the ratio-based model we consider produces more genes with significant mouse effects than the intensity-based model, but fewer genes with significant tissue effects. Both models demonstrate a general statistical framework for concurrently estimating sources of variability and assessing their significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chu, T., Weir, B., and Wolfinger, R. (2002). A systematic statistical linear modeling approach to oligonucleotide array experiments. Math. Biosci. 176, 35–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X. and Churchill, G. (2003). How many mice and how many arrays? Replication in mouse cDNA microarray experiment. In S. Lin, K. Johnson (Eds), Methods of Microarray Data Analysis III. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, K., and Churchill, G. (2001). Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. Biostatistics. 2: 183–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, C.C., Hsu, L., Delrow, J. and Nelson, P.S. (2001). Project normal: defining normal variance in mouse gene expression. PNAS. 98, 13266–13271. Updated data and results are at http://www.pedb.org.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R. D., Gibson, G., Wolfinger, E. D., Bennett, L., Hamadeh, H., Bushel, P., Afshari, C., and Paules, R. S. (2001). Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed model. J. Comp. Bio., 8, 625–637.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deng, S., Chu, TM., Wolfinger, R. (2004). Simultaneous Assessment of Transcriptomic Variability and Tissue Effects in the Normal Mouse. In: Johnson, K.F., Lin, S.M. (eds) Methods of Microarray Data Analysis III. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48354-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48354-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7582-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48354-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics