Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Traffic Generation, Distribution, and Assignment

  • Chapter
Traffic Theory

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 50))

  • 303 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beckman, M. J. and Golob, T. F. (1972), “Critique of Entropy and Gravity in Travel Forecasting”, Traffic Flow and Transportation, edited by G. F. Newell, New York: Elsevier, pp. 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R. (1958), “On a Routing Problem,”, Quart. Appl. Math., XVI, 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E. (1974), “Structure of Passenger Travel Demand Models”, Transportation Research Record, 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E. and Lerman, S. R. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E. and Bolduc, D. (1996), “Multinomial Probit with a Logit Kernel and a General Parametric Specification of the Covariance Structure”, presented at the 3rd International Choice Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E. and M. Bierlaire, M. (1999), “Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions”, in Handbook of Transportation Science, Chapter 2, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, B. R., Chinitz, B. and Hoover, E. M. (1961), Technical Supplement to the New York Metropolitan Regional Study, Cambrdge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierlaire, M., Lotan, T. and Toint, P. L. (1997), “On the Overspecification of of Multinomial and Nested Logit Models due to Alternative Specific Constants”, Transp. Sci. 31, 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M. (1986), “A Constraint Qualification for a Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model”, Trans. Sci., 20, 55–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M. (1987), “Optimal Time-Varying Flows on Congested Networks”, Oper. Res., 35, 58–69.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cascetta, E. (1989). “A Stochastic Process Approach to the Analysis of Temporal Dynamics in Transportation Networks”, Transp. Res. 23B, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damm, D. (1983), “Theory and Empirical Results: A Comparison of Recent Activity-Based Research”, in Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis, edited by S. Carpenter and P. Jones, London: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, E. W. (1959), “A Note on Two Problems in Connection with Graphs”, Numer. Math. 1, 269–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Florian, M. and Hearn, D. (1999), “Network Equilibrium and Pricing”, in Handbook of Transportation Science, edited by R. W. Hall, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 361–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, L. R. and Fulkerson, D. R. (1962), Flow in Networks, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesz, T. L., Bernstein, D., Smith, T. E., Tobin, M. L. and Wie, B. W. (1993), “A Variational Inequality Formulation of the Dynamic Network User Equilibrium Problem”, Oper. Res., 4, 179–191.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gazis, D. C. (1974), “Modeling and Optimal Control of Congested Transportation Systems”, Networks, 4,113–124.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gazis, D. C. and Herman, R. (1992), “The Moving and ‘Phantom’ Bottlenecks”, Transp. Science, 26, No.3, 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazis, D, C. (1995), “Congestion Abatement in ITS through Centralized Route Allocation”, IVHS Journal, 2, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazis, D. C. (1998), PASHAs: Advanced Intelligent Agents in the Service of Electronic Commerce, in The Future of the Electronic Marketplace, edited by D. Leebaert, MIT Press, 145–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel, E. J. (1958), Statistics of Extremes, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. G. (1960), “Land Use Forecasting for Transportation Planning”, Highway Research Board Bulletin, 253, 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helly, W. (1969), “A Time-Dependent Intervening Opportunity Land Use Model”, Socio-Economic Planning Sci., 3, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helly, W. (1974), “Traffic Generation, Distribution, and Assignment”, Traffic Science, edited by D. C. Gazis, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, M, Prashkea, J. N. and Ben-Akiva, M. (1986), “Dynamic Model of Weekly Activity Pattern”, Transp. Sci., 20, 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J. K. (1980), “A Successive Linear Optimization Approach to the Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem”, Trans. Sci., 14, 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (1983), “The Practical Application of Activity Based Approaches in Transport Planning: An Assessment”, in Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis, edited by S. Carpenter and P. Jones, London: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. (1959), Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis, New York: J. Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1978), “Modeling the Choice of Residual Location”, in Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1989), “A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models Without Numerical Integration”, Econometrica, 57, 995–1026.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, D. K. (1974), A Study of Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Control, PhD Dissertation. Cornell Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, D. K. and Nemhauser, G. L. (1978a), “A Model and an Algorithm for the Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem”, Trans. Sci., 12, 163–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, D. K. and Nemhauser, G. L. (1978b), “Optimality Conditions for a Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem” Trans. Sci., 12, 200–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murchand, J. D. (1969), “Bibliography of the Shortest Route Problem”, London Business Studies Report, LBS-TNT-6.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pas, E. I. (1982), “Analytically-Derived Classification of Daily Travel-Activity Behavior: Description, Evaluation and Interpolation”, Transp. Res. Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, R. B. and Oliver, R. M. (1972), Flows in Transportation Networks, New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putman, S. H. (1966), “Analytic Models fr Implementing the Economic Impact Studies for the Northeast Corridor Transportation Project”, 30th National Meeting, Operations Research Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiter, E. R. (1967). “Improvements in Understanding, Calibrating, and Applying the Opportunity Model”, Highway Res. Rec., 165, 1–21.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. (1960), Chicago Area Transportation Study, Vol. 2, 1960.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, G. G. (1960), “A Model for General Urban Growth”, Management Sciences-Models and Techniques, New York: Pergamon, Vol. 2, pp.147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopher, P. R., Meyburg, A. H. and Brog, W., editors, (1979), Proc. of the 4 th Intern. Conf. On Behavioral Travel Modeling, Grainau, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S. A. (1940), “Intervening Opportunities”, Amer. Sociological Rev., 5, 845–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdloff, C. N. and Stowers, J. R. (1966), “A Test of Some First Generation Residential Land Use Models”, 45th Highway Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1972), “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice”, Psychological Review, 79, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, A. M. (1955), “A General Theory of Traffic Movement”, Proc. Inst. Traffic Engrs, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop, J. G. (1952), “Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research”, Proc. Inst. Civil Engineers, Part II, 325–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. G. (1967), “A Statistical Theory of Spatial Distribution Models”, Transport. Res., 1, 253–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yagar, S. (1970), Analysis of the Peak Period Travel in a Freeway-Arterial Network, PhD Dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagar, S. (1971), “Dynamic Traffic Assignment by Individual Path Minimization and Queueing”, Trans. Res., 5, 170–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wie, B. W. (1991), “Traffic Assignment, Dynamic”, in Concise Encyclopedia of Traffic & Transportation Systems, edited by M. Papageorgiou, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 521–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. H., Chen, Y. and Florian, M. (1997a), “The Continuous Dynamic Network Loading Problem: A Mathematical Formulation and Solution Method”, Transp. Res. 32B, 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Wu, J. H., Florian, M., Marcotte, P. and Zhu, D. L. (2002), “Advances in the Continuous Dynamic Network Loading Problem”, Transp. Sci., (in press).

    Google Scholar 

Additional references

  • Aashtiani, H. Z. and Magnanti, T. L. (1981), “Equilibria in a Congested Transportation Network”, SIAM J. of Algebraic and Discrete Methods, 2, 213–226.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arezki, Y. and Van Vliet, D. (1990), “A Full Analytical Implementation of the PARTAN/Frank-Wolfe Algorithm for Equilibrium Assignment”, Transp. Sci., 24, 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M. J. and Golob, T. F. (1972), “A Critique of Entropy and Gravity in Travel Forecasting”, Traffic Flow and Transportation, edited by G. F. Newell, New York: Elsevier, pp.109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, S. (1972), “The Traffic Assignment Model for Multi-Class Transportation Network”, Tramp. Sci, 6, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, S. and A. Nagurney, A. (1984), “Sensitivity Analysis for the Asymmetric Network Equilibrium Problem”, Math. Programming, 28, 174–184.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, P. and Van Vliet, D. (1979), “Capacity Restrained Road Assignment”, Traffic Eng. and Control, 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. P. (1976), “Derivation and Analysis of Some Models for Combining Trip Distribution and Assignment”, Transp. Res., 10, 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florian, M. and Nguyen, S. (1976), “An Application and Validation of Equilibrium Trip Assignment Methods”, Transp. Sci., 10, 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian, M. and Spiess, H. (1983), “On Binary Mode Choice/Assignment Models”, Transp. Sci., 17, 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florian, M., Guelat, Y. and Spiess, H. (1987), “An Efficient Implementation of the PARTAN variant of the Linear Approximation for the Network Equilibrium Problem”, Networks, 17, 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florian, M. and Hearn, D. (1995), “Network Equilibrium Models and Algorithms”, Chapter 6 in Handbook in OR and MS, Vol. 8, M. Ball et al, editors, pp.485–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratar, T. J. (1954), “Forecasting Distribution of Interzonal Vehicular Trips by Successive Approximations”, Proc. Highway Res. Brd., 33, 376–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, P. (1956), “Die Variationsrechnung als Planungsverfahren der Stadt und Landesplanung”, Schriften der Akademie fur Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Brenen-Horn: Walter Dorn, Vol. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M, (1978), “Properties of the Equilibrium State in Transportation Networks”, Transp. Sci., 12, 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburg, J. R. and Sharkey, R. H. (1961) “Land Use Forecast”, Chicago Area Transportation Study, Chicago, 3.2.6.10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmann, F. V. (1964), Population Forecasting Methods, Washington, DC: Bureau of Public Roads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, B. (1962), “Linear Programming and the Projection of Land Users”, Penn-Jersey Transportation Study, PJ paper No. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helly, W. (1965), “Efficiency in Road Traffic Flow”, Proc. 2 nd Intern, Symp. on Theory of Traffic Flow, Paris: OECD, pp. 264–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J. D. and B. H. Stevens, B. H. (1960), “A Model for the Distribution of Residential Activity in Urban reas”, J. Regional Sci. Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino, T. (1972), “Theory of Traffic Assignment to a Road Network”, Traffic Flow and Transportation, edited by G. F. Newell, New York: Elsevier, pp. 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1981), “Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Costs”, Quarterly J. of Economics, 38, 306–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, T. and Newell, G. F. (1967), “Flow Dependent Traffic Assignment in a Circular City”, Transp. Sci., 1, No. 4, 318–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, L. J., Morlok, E. K. and Pierskalla, W. P. (1975), “An Efficient Approach to Solving the Road Network Equilibrium Traffic Assignment Problem”, Transp. Sci., 5, 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, S. (1976), “A Unified Approach to Equilibrium Methods for Traffic Assignment”, in Traffic Equilibrium Methods, Proceedings 1974, edited by M. Florian, vol. 118. Lecture notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 148–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, M. (1990), “Dynamic Modeling, Assignment, and Route Guidance in Traffic Networks”, Transp. Res., 24B, 471–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patriksson, P. (1983), The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods, VNU Science Press, p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. B. and Sheffi, Y. (1982), “The Convergence of Equilibrium Algorithms with Predetermined Step Sizes”, Transp. Sci., 16, 45–55.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. and Powell, W. B. (1982), “An Algorithm for the Equilibrium Assignment Problem with Random Link Times”, Networks, 12, 191–207.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Smeed, R. J. (1961), The Traffic Problem in Towns, Manchester: Manchester Statistical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J. (1979), “Existence, Uniqueness and Stability of Traffic Equilibria”, Transp. Res., 13B, 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J. (1993), “A New Dynamic Traffic Model and the Existence and Calculation of Dynamic User Equilibria On Congested Capacity Constrained Road Network”, Transp. Res., 27B, 49–63.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdloff, C. N. and Stowers, J. R. (1966), “A Test of Some First Generation Residential Land Use Models”, 5 th Highway Res. Brd. Meeting, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Public Roads, Traffic Assignment Manual, Washington, DC, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Public Roads, Highway Capacity Manual, Washington, DC, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, A. M. (1955), “A General Theory of Traffic Movement”, Proc. Inst. Traffic Engrs., 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wie, B., Tobin, R., Bernstein, R. and Friesz, T. (1995), “Comparison of System Optimum and User Equilibrium Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Schedule Delays”, Transp. Res., 3C, 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2002). Traffic Generation, Distribution, and Assignment. In: Traffic Theory. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 50. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48217-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48217-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7095-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48217-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation