Advertisement

Community, Coherence, and Inclusiveness

  • Kenneth A. Strike
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 1)

Abstract

This paper develops a theory of schools as communities. It argues that the key to a school that is a community is that such schools are rooted in something I call a Shared Educational Project. An SEP is a constitutive vision of the nature of a good education that involves public ends requiring cooperation to achieve. An SEP also generates a conception of the roles to be played by various actors in the school, grounds instructional practice, and informs governance. An SEP also is important in securing what I call the goods of community such as trust, cooperation, belonging and mutual identification. The liability of such communities is that full membership in the community is predicated on agreeing with the SEP. Since the SEP will be rooted in a “thick” conception of human flourishing, agreement cannot be imposed. Hence such communities cannot be fully inclusive and should be formed through free association. I provide examples of several models of such school communities. I also discuss two models of what I call quasi communities. Quasi communities do not have an SEP; however, they may have shared views of good educating (rather than good education), may have a strong commitment to justice, caring and inclusiveness, and may have informal, non-bureaucratic organization forms. I argue that quasi communities may also produce some of the goods of community, and they may be more fully inclusive. Regardless, there are reasons to suppose that they will not be stable and that they will be less successful in generating the goods of community than will schools grounded in an SEP.

Keywords

Good Education School Community Free Association Catholic School Comprehensive Doctrine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, B. (1998). Clansmen, consumers and citizens: Three takes on civil society. Rutgers University: Working Paper #4.Google Scholar
  2. Bryk, A.S., Lee, V.E., & Holland, P.B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, J.S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology (Supplement), 94, S95–S120.Google Scholar
  6. Chubb, J.E., & Moe, T.M. (1990). Politics markets and the American school. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  7. Green, T. (1999). Voices: The educational formation of conscience. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hume, D. (1967). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  11. Noddings, N, (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Putman, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Snow, C P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Strike, K.A. (1999a). Can schools be communities? The tension between shared values and inclusion. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Strike, K.A. (1999b). Justice, caring, and universality: In defense of moral pluralism. In M. Katz, N. Noddings, & K. Strike (Eds.), Justice and caring: The search for common ground in education (pp. 21–36). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Tonnies, F. (1988). Community and society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  20. Vivian, C. (2000). The influence of school communities on student identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.Google Scholar
  21. Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972). 406 U.S. 205 (U.S.S.C.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth A. Strike

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations