Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 62))

  • 2447 Accesses

Abstract

Recent business and technological trends have transformed the structure and performance requirements for distribution channels in many industries. Higher service level expectations of retail customers, distribution outsourcing by manufacturers, and the proliferation of advanced information technologies drive these transformations, presenting new problems in supply chain management. Motivated by a project with a leading building-products manufacturer, this paper addresses some of these new issues. Over the past two decades, this manufacturer witnessed the migration of building-products sales from independent specialty retailers to largeretail chains, prompting it to create a new network of independent distributors to meet the service expectations of these ‘big-box’ retailers. This paper addresses three important challenges in managing the new distribution network. We first develop a fee-setting model to decide the manufacturer’s compensation scheme for the services provided by its in dependent distributors. Next, we address a tactical distribution planning problem, incorporating resource acquisition and deployment decisions, for scheduled deliveries when demand is highly variable. Lastly, we investigate possible mechanisms for limiting retail store-order variability, and analyze the system-wide cost benefits resulting from variability reduction. In addition to identifying new modeling opportunities and discussing their implications for the building-products manufacturer, this paper highlights new research opportunities resulting from the evolving dynamics of supply chain management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baganha, M.P., and M.A. Cohen, 1998. “The Stabilizing Effect of Inventory in Supply Chains,” Operations Research, 46(Su 3), S72–S83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, A., H.P. Natarajan, and M.S. Pangburn, 2000 “Optimizing Delivery Feesfora Network of Distributors,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2(3), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas, D.J., and D. Simchi-Levi, 1996. “A New Generation of Vehicle Routing Research: Robust Algorithms, Addressing Uncertainty,” Operations Research, 44(2), 286–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birge, J.R., and F. Louveaux, 1997. Introduction to Stochastic Programming, Springer, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P., 1999. “Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability With Scheduled Ordering Policies,” Management Science, 45(6), 843–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P., and P.H. Zipkin, 1999. “Competitive And Cooperative Inventory Policies In A Two-Stage Supply Chain,” Management Science, 45(7), 936–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., 1999. “Decentralized Supply Chains Subjectto Information Delays,” Management Science, 45(8), 1076–1090.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.J., and H. Scarf, 1960. “Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem,” Management Science, 6, 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavirneni, S., R. Kapuscinski, and S. Tayur, 1999. “The Value Of Information In Capacitated Supply Chains,” Management Science, 45(1), 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, M., G. Laporte, and R. Seguin, 1996. “A Tabu Search Heuristic For The Vehicle Routing Problem With Stochastic Demands And Customers,” Operations Research, 44(3), 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, M., Laporte, G., and Seguin, R., 1996. “Stochastic Vehicle Routing,” European Journal of Operational Research, 88(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geunes, J., 1999. Models To Optimize Multi-Stage Linkages In Manufacturing And Distribution Operations, Ph.D. Thesis, Penn State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, M., Y. Gerchak, R. Ernst, and D.F. Pyke, 1997. “An Inventory Model Embeddedin Designing a Supply Contract,” Management Science, 43(2), 184–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higle, J.L., and S. Sen, 1996. Stochastic Decomposition: A Statistical Method For Large Scale Stochastic Linear Programming, Kluwer, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., V. Padmanabhan, and S. Whang, 1997. “Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect,” Management Science, 43(4), 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., K.C. So, and C.S. Tang, 2000. “The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain,” Management Science, 46(5), 626–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., and S. Whang, 1999. “Decentralized Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: Incentives And Information,” Management Science, 45(5), 633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., and P. Kouvelis, 1999. “Flexible and Risk-Sharing Supply Contracts Under Price Uncertainty,” Management Science, 45(10), 1378–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moinzadeh, K., and S. Nahmias, 2000. “Adjustment Strategies for a Fixed Delivery Contract,” Operations Research, 48(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias, S., 2000. Production and Operations Analysis, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, E.L., 1990. “Stochastic Inventory Theory,” Ch. 12 in D.P. Heyman and M. Sobel (eds.), Handbooks in OR & MS, v2, North-Holland: Elsevier Publishers B.V., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porteus, E.L., 2000. “Responsibility Tokens in Supply Chain Management,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2(2), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simchi-Levi, D., P. Kaminsky, and E. Simchi-Levi, 2000. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W.R., Golden, B.L., 1983. “Stochastic Vehicle Routing: A Comprehensive Approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, 14(4), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A., 1999 “The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives,” Management Science, 45(10), 1339–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balakrishnan, A., Geunes, J., Pangburn, M.S. (2002). Coordinating the Distribution Chain: New Models for New Challenges. In: Geunes, J., Pardalos, P.M., Romeijn, H.E. (eds) Supply Chain Management: Models, Applications, and Research Directions. Applied Optimization, vol 62. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48172-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics