Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 62))

Abstract

Consider a manufacturer or wholesaler who supplies some item to retailers facing demand rates which depend on the shelf or display space devoted to that product by themselves and their competitors. The manufacturer, via the use of financial levers at her disposal, wishes to coordinate this decentralized chain while making a profit. With a single retailer, we show that the manufacturer can achieve this goal by using a two-parameter contract: a wholesale price and an inventory holding costs subsidy offered to the retailer. When multiple retailers compete in that product’s market, there are two ways to envision and model the demand and market split. One assumes that market demand depends on aggregate inventory displayed, and then splits according to individual display levels. The other “assigns” customers to retailers according to their display levels, and then assumes that purchases are a function of the display level at the retailer selected. We characterize retailers’ Nash equilibria in these models, and explore whether the manufacturer can coordinate such channels. Information requirements for channel coodination and profit allocation are discussed throughout the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anupindi, R. and Y. Bassok (1999) “Centralization of Stocks: Retailer vs. Manufacturer,” Management Science, 45(2), 178–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anupindi, R., Y. Bassok and E. Zemel (1999) “Study of Decentralized Distribution Systems: Part II — Application,” Working paper, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.C. and T.L. Urban (1988) “A deterministic Inventory System with an Invenoty-Level-Dependent Demand Rate,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, 823–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, A., M.S. Pangburn and E. Stavrulaki (2000) “Stack Them High, Let’ em Fly: Lot-Sizing Policies When Inventories Stimulate Demand,” Working paper, Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P. (1999) “Competitive Supply Chain Inventory Management,” Chapter 5 in Tayur et al. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P. and M.A. Lariviere (1999) “Contracting to Assure Supply: How to Share Demand Forecasts in a Supply Chain,” Working Paper, The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L.G. (1993) “Marketing Share Models,” Chapter 6 in Eliashberg and Lilien (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, C.J. and C.S. Tang (1999) “Designing Supply Contracts: Contract Type and Information Asymmetry,” Chapter 9 in Tayur et al. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corstjens, M. and P. Doyle (1981) “A Model for Optimizing Retail Space Allocation,” Management Science, 27, 822–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana Jr., J.D. (2000) “Competition in Price and Availability when Availability is Unobservable,” Working paper, Dept. of Management and Strategy, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana Jr., J.D. and K.E. Spier (2000) “Revenue Sharing, Demand Uncertainty, and Vertical Control of Competing Firms,” Working paper, Dept. of Management and Strategy, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneckere, R. and J. Peck (1995) “Competition over Price and Service Rate When Demand is Stochastic: A Strategic Analysis,” RAND Journal of Economics, 26(1), 148–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J. And G.L. Lilien (eds.) (1993) Marketing, Vol. 5 of Handbooks in OR/MS, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J. and R. Steinberg (1993) “Marketing-Production Joint Decision-Making,” Chapter 18 in Eliashberg and Lilien (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak, Y. and Y. Wang (2000) “Revenue-Sharing vs. Wholesale-Price Contracts in Assembly Systems with Random Demand,” Working paper, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak, Y. and Y. Wang (1994) “Periodic-Review Inventory Models with Inventory-Level-Dependent Demand,” Naval Research Logistics, 41, 99–116.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, A.Y. (1998) “Supply Contract for a Short-Life-Cycle Product with Demand Uncertainty and Asymmetric Cost Information,” Working Paper, Yale School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglehart, D.L. and S.C. Jaquette (1969) “Multi-Class Inventory Models with Demand a Function of the Inventory Level,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 16, 495–502.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jeuland, A. and S. Shugan (1983) “Managing Channel Profits,” Marketing Science, 2, 239–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E.L. (1968) “On (s, S) Policies,” Management Science, 15, 80–101.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kollat, D.T. and R.P. Willet (1969) “Is Impulse Purchasing Really a Useful Concept for Marketing Decisions?,” Journal of Marketing, Jan., 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1984) Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control, 5th ed., Printice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, H.E. (1965) “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning without Improvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Fall, 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, M.A. (1999) “Supply Chain Contracting and Coordination with Stochastic Demand,” Chapter 8 in Tayur et al. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, M. and E.L. Porteus (1999) “Selling to the Newsvendor,” Working Paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S.A. and K.F. McCardle (1997) “The Competitive Newsboy,” Operations Research, 45, 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, G.E. (1987) “The Structure of Equilibria in Market Share Attraction Models,” Management Science, 33(2), 228–243.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, K.S. (1993) “Competitive Marketing Strategies: Game-Theoretic Models,” Chapter 4 in Eliashberg and Lilien (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, M. and S. Seshadri (1996) “Policy Mechanisms for Supply Chain Coordination,” Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY 10012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack, B. (1985) “Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities,” Marketing Science, 4, 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack, B. (1990), “The Newsboy Problem with Balking,” Presented at ORSA/TIMS conference, Philadelphia, Oct. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlar, M., S. Bar-Lev and D. Perry (1994) “On the EOQ Model with Inventory-Level-Dependent Demand Rate and Random Yield,” Operations Research Letters, 16, 167–176.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schary, P.B. and B.W. Becker (1972) “Distribution and Final Demand: The Influence of Availability,” Mississippi Valley Journal of Business and Economics, 8, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, J. (1950) “Vertical Integration and Anti-Trust Policy,” Journal of Political Economy, 58, 347–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayur, S., R. Ganeshan and M. Magazine (1999) Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A.A. and N. Agrawal (1998) “Supply Chain Dynamics Under Price and Service Competition,” Department of Operations & Management Information Systems, Santa Clara University

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (1992) Inventory Models with Inventory-Level-Dependent Demand, M.A.Sc Thesis, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, Y., Gerchak, Y. (2002). Supply Chain Contracting and Coordination with Shelf-Space-Dependent Demand. In: Geunes, J., Pardalos, P.M., Romeijn, H.E. (eds) Supply Chain Management: Models, Applications, and Research Directions. Applied Optimization, vol 62. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48172-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics