Emergence and Future of Experimental Economics

  • Reinhard Selten
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 237)


Experimental Psychology Economic Behavior Experimental Economic Coalition Game Double Auction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berg, C.C., Selten, R. 1970. “Ein Gerät zur akustischen Anzeige von Entscheidungspunkten in Oligopolexperimenten mil kontinuierlicher Zeit”. In H. Sauermann (ed), 1970, pp. 162–221.Google Scholar
  2. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze B. 1983. “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367–388.Google Scholar
  3. Häselbarth, V. 1967. “Literaturhinweise zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung”. In H. Sauermann (ed.), 1967, pp. 267–276.Google Scholar
  4. Kagel, J.H., Roth, A.E. (eds.) 1995. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kalish, G.K., Milnor, J.W., Nash, J.F. and Nering, F.D. 1954. “Some Experimental n-Person Games”. In Thrall, R.M., Coombs, C.H., Davis, R.S. (eds.), Decision Processes. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Ricciardi. F.M. 1957. Top Management Decision Simulation. The AMA Approach. New York.Google Scholar
  7. Sauermann, H., Selten R. 1957. “Ein Oligopolexperiment”. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 115: 427–471. Reprinted in H. Sauermann (ed.), 1967, pp. 9–59.Google Scholar
  8. Sauermann, H. 1967. Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, I. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  9. Sauermann, H. 1970. Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, II. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  10. Sauermann, H. 1972. Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung, III. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  11. Selten, R. 1978. “The Chain-Store Paradox”. Theory and Decision 9: 127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Siegel, S. and Fouraker, L.F. 1960. Bargaining and Group Decision Making — Experiments in Monopoly. New York-Toronto-London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Siegel, S. and Fouraker, L. E. 1963. Bargaining Behavior New York-Toronto-London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Simon, H. 1959. “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science”. American Economic Review 49: 253–283.Google Scholar
  15. Simon, H. 1972. “Theories of Bounded Rationality”. In C.B. Radner and R. Radner (eds.), Decision and Organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. Reprinted in H. Simon, Models of Bounded Rationality, II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, V. 1962. “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior”. Journal of Political Economy 70: 111–137.Google Scholar
  17. Tietz, R. and Weber, H. J. 1972. “On the Nature of the Bargaining Process in the Kresko Game”. In H. Sauermann (ed.), 1972, pp. 305–334.Google Scholar
  18. Weber, H.-J. 1972. “Bibliography”. In H. Sauermann (ed.), 1972, pp. 690–699.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reinhard Selten
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut fü Gesellschafts- und WirtschaftswissenschaftenUniversität BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations