Bayesian Evidence

  • Colin Howson
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 237)


Maximum Entropy Principle Deductive Logic Bayesian Theory Dutch Book Epistemic Probability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bayes, T. 1763. “An Essay Towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 53: 370–418.Google Scholar
  2. Birnbaum, A. 1962. “On the Foundations of Statistical Inference”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 269–306.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. De Finetti, B. 1937. “Foresight, Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources”. Translated and reprinted in H. Kyburg and H. Smokler (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability. New York: Wiley, 1964, pp. 93–159.Google Scholar
  5. Earman, J. 1992. Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination ofBayesian Conformation Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gaifman, H. 1964. “Concerning Measures in First Order Calculi”. Israel Journal of Mathematics: 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. Halmos, P. 1950. Measure Theory. New York: Van Nostrand, Reinhold.Google Scholar
  8. Hellman, G. 1997. “Bayes and Beyond”. Philosophy of Science 64: 190–210.Google Scholar
  9. Howson, C. 1997a. Logic With Trees. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Howson, C. 1997b. “Bayesian Rules of Updating”. Erkenntnis 45: 195–208.Google Scholar
  11. Howson, C. 2000. Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Howson, C. 2002. “A Logic for Statistics”. Proceedings of the 2001 British Academy Bayes Theorem Conference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Howson, C. and Urbach, P.M. 1993. Scientific Reasoning: the Bayesian Approach. Chicago: Open Court, second edition.Google Scholar
  14. Jeffreys, H. 1961. Theory of Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, third edition.Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, K. 1996. The Logic of Reliable Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Khinchin, A.I. 1949. Mathematical Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  17. Laplace, P.S. de, 1820. “Essai philosophique sur les probabilités”. Page references are to Philosophical Essay of Probability. New York: Dover, 1951.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, P.M. 1997. Bayesian Statistics. London: Arnold, second editionGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis, D. 1981. “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance”. In R.C. Jeffrey (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 263–293.Google Scholar
  20. Lindley, D.V. 1957. “A Statistical Paradox”. Biometrika 44: 187–192.Google Scholar
  21. Paris, J. 1994. The Uncertain Reasoner’s Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ramsey, F.P. 1926. “Truth and Probability”. In The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1931, pp. 156–199.Google Scholar
  23. Savage, L.J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Shafer, G. 1982. “Lindley’s Paradox”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77: 325–334.Google Scholar
  25. Smullyan, R.M. 1968. First Order Logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  26. Teller, P. 1973. “Conditionalisation and Observation”. Synthese 26: 218–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van Fraassen, B. van 1984. “Belief and the Will”. Journal of Philosophy 81: 235–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Howson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific MethodLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations