2.5 Conclusion
Discrete choice methods are constantly evolving to accommodate the requirements of specific applications. This is an exciting field of research, where a deep understanding of the underlying theoretical assumptions is necessary both to apply the models and develop new ones. In this Chapter, we have summarized the fundamental aspects of discrete choice theory, and we have introduced recent model developments, illustrating their richness. A discussion on route choice and departure time choice applications have shown how specific aspects of real applications must be addressed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antoniou, C., Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M. and Mishalani, R. (1997). Demand simulation for dynamic traffic assignment, Proceedings of the 8th IFAC Symposium on Transportation Systems, Chania, Greece.
Azevedo J.A., Santos Costa M.E.O., Silvestre Madeira J.J.E.R. and Vieira Martins, E.Q. (1993) “An algorithm for the ranking of shotest paths”. European Journal of Operational Research 69 97–106.
Ben-Akiva, M. and Bierlaire, M. (1999). Discrete choice methods and their applications to short-term travel decisions, in R. Hall (ed.), Handbook of Transportation Science, Kluwer, pp. 5–34.
Ben-Akiva, M. and Bolduc, D. (1996). Multinomial probit with a logit kernel and a general parametric specification of the covariance structure. Paper presented at the 3rd Invitational Choice Symposium, Columbia University.
Ben-Akiva, M., Bolduc, D. and Walker, J. (2001). Specification, Identification, & Estimation of the Logit Kernel (or Continuous Mixed Logit) Model, Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Camridge, MA.
Ben-Akiva, M. E. (1973). Structure of passenger travel demand models, PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, Ma.
Ben-Akiva, M. E. (1974). Structure of passenger travel demand models, Transportation Research Record 526.
Ben-Akiva, M.E. and Boccara, B. (1995) Discrete Choice Models with Latent Choice sets, International Journal of Research in Marketing 12, pp. 9–24.
Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bergman, M. J., Daly, A. J. and Ramaswamy, R. (1984). Modeling interurban route choice behaviour, in J. Volmuller and R. Hamerslag (eds), Proceedings from the ninth international symposium on transportation and traffic theory, VNU Science Press, Utrecht, Netherlands, pp. 299–330.
Ben-Akiva, M. E. and Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.
Ben-Akiva, M. and Francois, B. (1983). μ homogeneous generalized extreme value model, Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, Ma.
Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Train, K., Walker, J., Bhat, C., Bierlaire, M., Bolduc, D., Boersch-Supan, A., Brownstone, D., Bunch, D., Daly, A., de Palma, A., Gopinath, D., Karlstrom, A. and Munizaga, M. A. (2002). Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges. Accepted for publication in Marketing Letters.
Bertsekas, D. P. (1995). Nonlinear Programming, Athena Scientific, Belmont.
Bhat, C. (2001). Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model, TRB 35(7): 677–693.
Bierlaire, M. (1995). A robust algorithm for the simultaneous estimation of hierarchical logit models, GRT Report 95/3, Department of Mathematics, FUNDP.
Bierlaire, M. (1998). Discrete choice models, in M. Labbé, G. Laporte, K. Tanczos and P. Toint (eds), Operations Research and Decision Aid Methodologies in Traffic and Transportation Management, Vol. 166 of NATO ASI Series, Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, Springer Verlag, pp. 203–227.
Bierlaire, M. (2001a). A general formulation of the cross-nested logit model, Proceedings of the 1st Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, http://www.strc.ch
Bierlaire, M. (2001b). An introductory tutorial to BIOGEME. URL: http://rosowww.epfl.ch/mbi/biogeme
Bierlaire, M. (2002). The network GEV model, Proceedings of the 2nd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland. http://www.strc.ch
Bierlaire, M., Lotan, T. and Toint, P. L. (1997). On the overspecification of multinomial and nested logit models due to alternative specific constants, Transportation Science 31(4): 363–371.
Bierlaire, M. and Vandevyvere, Y. (1995). HieLoW: the interactive user’s guide, Transportation Research Group-FUNDP, Namur.
Bolduc, D. (1992). Generalized Autoregressive Errors in the Multinomial Probit Model, Transportation Research B 26(2), 155–170
Bolduc, D. (1999). A practical technique to estimate multinomial probit models in transportation, Transportation Research B 33(1): 63–79.
Bolduc, D. and Ben-Akiva, M. (1991) A Multinomial Probit Formulation for Large Choice Sets. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Travel Behaviour 2, 243–258.
Bradley, M. A. and Daly, A. (1991). Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated preferences and revealed preferences information, Methods for understanding travel behaviour in the 1990’s, International Association for Travel Behaviour, Qu’ebec, pp. 116–133. 6th international conference on travel behaviour.
Bunch, D.A. (1991) Estimability in the Multinomial Probit Model. Transportation Research B 25 1–12.
Burrell, J. E. (1968). Multipath route assignment and its application to capacity restraint, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow (Karlsruhe).
Cardell and Dunbar (1980). Measuring the societal impacts of automobile downsizing, Transportation Research A 14(5–6): 423–434.
Cascetta, E., Nuzzolo, A. and Biggiero, L. (1992). Analysis and modeling of commuters’ departure time and route choice in urban networks, Proceedings of the second international Capri seminar on urban traffic networks.
Cascetta, E., Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F. and Vitetta, A. (1996). A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems. Specification and some calibration results for interurban networks, Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow (Lyon, France).
Cascetta, E. and Papola, A. (1998). Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand, Technical report, Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II.
Conn, A., Gould, N. and Toint, P. (2000). Trust region methods, MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization, SIAM.
Daganzo, C. F. and Sheffi, Y. (1977). On stochastic models of traffic assignment, Transportation Science 11(3): 253–274.
Daly, A. (1987). Estimating “tree” logit models, Transportation Research B 21(4): 251–268.
Daly, A. (2001). Recursive nested EV model. Paper presented at the Invitational Choice Symposium, Asilomar, Ca.
de Palma, A. and Fontan, C. (2001). Departure time choice and heterogeneity of commuters, Proceedings of the 9th WCTR. Paper 4149.
de Palma, A., Fontan, C. and Mekkaoui, O. (2000). Trip timing for public transportation: an empirical application, Technical Report 2000-19, Université de Cergy-Pontoise-Université de Paris X Nanterre, Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Application. UMR 7536 CNRS.
Dennis, J. E. and Schnabel, R. B. (1983). Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA.
Dial, R. B. (1969). Algorithm 360: shortest path forest with topological ordering., Communications of ACM 12: 632–633.
Dial, R. B. (1971). A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment algorithm which obviates path enumeration, Transportation Research 5(2): 83–111.
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs, Numerische Mathematik 1: 269–271.
Everitt,B.S. (1984). An Introduction to Latent Variable Models, Monographs on Statistical and Applied Probability, Chapman and Hall.
Gopinath, D.A. (1995) Modeling Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice Processes: Application to Travel Demand, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Gumbel, E. J. (1958). Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press, New York.
Hendrickson, C. and Plank, E. (1984). The flexibility of departure times for work trips, Transportation Research A 18: 25–36.
Hensher D.A. and Greene W.H. (2002). Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: alternative normalizations, Transportation Research B 36(1): 1–18.
Kamakura, W.A. and G.J. Russell (1989). A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure, Journal of Marketing Research 25, 379–390.
Koppelman, F. S. and Wen, C.-H. (1998). Alternative nested logit models: Structure, properties and estimation, Transportation Research B 32(5): 289–298.
Liu, Y.-H. and Mahmassani, H. (1998). Dynamic aspects of departure time and route decision behavior under ATIS: modeling framework and experimental results, presented at the 77th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
Luce, R. (1959). Individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Manski, C. (1977). The structure of random utility models, Theory and Decision 8: 229–254.
McFadden, D. (1978). Modelling the choice of residential location, in A. Karlquist et al. (ed.), Spatial interaction theory and residential location, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 75–96.
McFadden, D. (1989). A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration, Econometrica 57(5): 995–1026.
McFadden, D. and Train, K. (2000). Mixed multinomial logit models for discrete response, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 15,No. 5, pp. 447–470.
Morokoff, W.J. and Caflish R.E. (1995) Quasi-Monte Carlo integration. Journal of Computational Physics 122.
Nguyen, S. and Pallottino, S. (1987). Traffic assignment for large scale transit networks, in A. Odoni (ed.), Flow control of congested networks, Springer Verlag.
Nguyen, S., Pallottino, S. and Gendreau, M. (1998). Implicit enumeration of hyperpaths in a logit model for transit networks, Transportation Science 32(1).
Panier, E. and Tits, A. L. (1993). On combining feasibility, descent and superlinear convergence in inequality constrained optimization, MP 59: 261–276.
Papola, A. (2000). Some development of the cross-nested logit model, Proceedings of the 9th IATBR Conference.
Ramming, M. S. (2001). Network Knowledge and Route Choice, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Severini, T.A. (2000) Likelihood methods in statistics, Oxford statistical science series, Oxford University Press.
Small, K. (1982). The scheduling of consumer activities: work trips, The American Economic Review pp. 467–479.
Small, K. (1987). A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives, Econometrica 55(2): 409–424.
Spanier, J. and Maize, H. (1994). Quasi-random methods for estimating integrals using relatively small samples, SIREV 36(1): 18–44.
Sprott D. A. (2000) Statistical inference in science, Springer series in statistics, Springer, New York.
Swait, J. (2001). Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models, TRB 35(7): 643–666.
Swait, J. and Ben-Akiva, M. (1987). Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation, TRB 21(2).
Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice, Psychological Review 79: 281–299.
Vovsha, P. (1997). Cross-nested logit model: an application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area, Transportation Research Board, 76th Annual Meeting, Washington DC. Paper #970387.
Vovsha, P. and Bekhor, S. (1998). The link-nested logit model of route choice: overcoming the route overlapping problem, Transportation Research Record 1645: 133–142.
Walker, J. L. (2001). Extended discrete choice models: integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wen, C.-H. and Koppelman, F. S. (2001). The generalized nested logit model, Transportation Research B 35(7): 627–641.
Yai T., Iwakura, S. and Morichi S. (1997). Multinomial Probit with Structured Covariance for Route Choice Behavior. Transportation Research B. 31(3) 195–207.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M. (2003). Discrete Choice Models with Applications to Departure Time and Route Choice. In: Hall, R.W. (eds) Handbook of Transportation Science. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 56. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48058-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48058-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7246-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48058-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive