Abstract
The understanding of universe has to utilize experimental data from the present to deduce the state of the universe in distant regions which implies in the distant past. Also, theories have to account for certain peculiarities or “coincidences” observed, first discovered by Eddington and Dirac. The prevalent view today in cosmology is the big bang, inflationary evolutionary model. This theory has to be finely tuned to account for these coincidences such as the flatness, the horizon and more recently the cosmological constant problems. Certain nagging problems have remained, e.g. the need to postulate cold, dark matter in amounts much larger than all the observable matter put together and more recently the need to postulate that the universe is even accelerating, i.e. the totally unknown and postulated cosmological constant prevails over the large structure of the universe. Big bang cosmology has been extrapolated to realms beyond its observational applicability and despite its impressive achievements, this methodology may go counter to the usual requirement of verification on which all science rests. We will present fundamentally different approaches that may be more in accord with quantum epistemology. Consequences of these approaches will be explored.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aspect, A., Grangier, P. and Roger, G (1982), Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91.
Bohr, N. (1961), Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature, 4, 34, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Dirac, P.A.M. (1937), Nature 139, 323.
Dirac, P.A.M. (1938), Proc. Royal Soc. A165, 199.
Drãgãnescu M., (1998), Constiinta fundamentala a existentei (The Fundamental Consciousness of Existence), Academica, ianuarie 1998, p.20–21 (p. I-a), Febr. 1998, p.20 (p. II-a), March 1998, p.III-a, p.28–29.
Drãgãnescu, M. (2000), “The Frontiers of Science and Self-Organization”, comm.. at the IV-th Conference Structural-Phenomenological Modeling, Academia Romana, June 20–21 (in press).
Drãgãnescu, M. and Kafatos, M. (2000a), in Consciousness in Science and Philosophy, Charleston, Ill., Noetic Journal, 2, 341–350.
Drãgãnescu, M. and Kafatos, M. (2000b), “Towards an Integrative Science,” Noesis (in press).
Dyson, F.J. (1972), in Aspects of Quantum Theory, ed. A. Salam and E.P. Wigner
Eddington, A.S. (1931), M.N.R.A.S. 91, 412.
Eddington, A.S. (1939), The Philosophy of Physical Science, Cambridge, CambridgeUniversiry Press.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935), Phys. Rev. 47, 777.
Geller, M.J. and Huchra, J. (1989), Science 246, 897.
Guth A., 1981, Phys. Rev. D., 23, 347
Harrington and S.P. Maran, 198, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, E.R. (1981), Cosmology: The Science of the Universe, 329, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kafatos, M. (1986), in Astrophysics of Brown Dwarfs, ed. M. Kafatos R.S.
Kafatos, M. (1989), in Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, ed. M. Kafatos, 195, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kafatos, M. (1996), in Examining the Big Bang and Diffuse Background Radiations, ed. M. Kafatos and Y. Kondo, 431, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kafatos, M. (1998), in Causality and Locality in Modern Physics, ed. G. Hunter et al., 29, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kafatos, M. (1999) Noetic Journal, 2 21–27.
Kafatos, M. and Kafatou, Th. (1991) Looking In, Seeing Out: Consciousness and Cosmos, Wheaton, Ill., Quest Books/The Theosophical Publishing House.
Kafatos, M. and Nadeau, R. (1990), The Conscious Universe: Part and Whole in Modern Physical Theory, New York, Springer-Verlag.
Kafatos, M. and Nadeau, R. (2000), The Conscious Universe: Part and Whole in Modern Physical Theory, second edition, New York, Springer-Verlag (in press).
Kafatos, M., Roy, S. and Amoroso, R. (2000), in Buccheri et al., (eds.) Studies on the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho(path)logy, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.
Nadeau, R., and Kafatos, M. (1999), The Non-local Universe: The New Physics and Maters of the Mind, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Peebles, P.J.E. (1993), Principles of Physical Cosmology, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Roy, S., and Kafatos, M., (1999), “Bell-type Correlations and Large Scale Structure of the Universe” (preprint).
Silk, J. (1989), The Big Bang, New York, W. H. Freeman.
Smoot, G.F. (1996), in Examining the Big Bang and Diffuse Background Radiations, ed. M. Kafatos and Y. Kondo, 31, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Struppa, D. C., Kafatos, M., Roy, S., Kato, G., and Amoroso, R. L. (2000), “Category Theory as the Language of Consciousness,” (submitted).
Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Zbinden, H. and Gisin, N. (1998), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563.
Wheeler, J.A. (1981) in Some Strangeness in the Proportion, ed. H. Woolf, Reading, Addison-Wesley Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kafatos, M. (2002). The Problem of Observation in Cosmology and the Big Bang. In: Amoroso, R.L., Hunter, G., Kafatos, M., Vigier, JP. (eds) Gravitation and Cosmology: From the Hubble Radius to the Planck Scale. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 126. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48052-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48052-2_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0885-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48052-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive