Skip to main content

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Engineering Shape Design

  • Chapter
Evolutionary Optimization

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 48))

Abstract

Evolutionary optimization algorithms work with a population of solutions, instead of a single solution. Since multi-objective optimization problems give rise to a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, evolutionary optimization algorithms are ideal for handling multi-objective optimization problems. Many years of research and application studies have produced a number of efficient multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), which are ready to be applied to real-world problems. In this paper, we propose a practical approach, which will enable an user to find a set of non-dominated solutions closer to the true Pareto-optimal front and simultaneously reduce the size of the obtained non-dominated solution set. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated in solving a number of mechanical shape optimization problems, including a simply-supported plate design, a cantilever plate design, a hoister design, and a bicycle frame design. The results are interesting and suggest immediate application of the prop osed technique to more complex engineering design problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chankong, V. and Haimes, Y. Y. (1983). Multiobjective decision making theory and methodology. North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. E., Deb, K., and Clark, J. H. (1992). Genetic algorithms, noise, and the sizing of populations. Complex Systems, 6:333–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. D. and Jakiela, M. J. (1996). Genetic algorithms based structural topology design with compliance and topology simplification considerations. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 118:89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Querin, O. M., and Steven, G. P. (2000). Post-processing of the two-dimensional evolutionary structure optimization topologies. In Evolutionati Design and Manufacture, London: Springer, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. D., Saitou, K., and Jakiela, M. J. (1994). Genetic algorithms as an approach to configuration and topology design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 116:1005–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K. (2001). Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K. and Agrawal, R. B. (1995). Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems, 9:115–148.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., and Meyarivan, T. (2000a). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: Nsga-ii. In Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, pages 849–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agrawal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2000b). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Technical Report No. 2000001, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, J. W. and Jakiela, M. J. (1997). Generation and classification of structural topologies with genetic algorithm speciation. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 119:127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, C. M. and Fleming, P. J. (1993). Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation, discussion, and generalization. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 416–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamada, H. and Schoenauer, M. (2000). Adaptive techniques for evolutionary optimum design. In Proceedings of the Evolutionary Design and Manufacture, pages 123–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harik, G., Cantu-paz, E., Goldberg, D. E., and Miller, B. L. (1999). The gambler’s ruin problem, genetic algorithms, and the sizing of populations. Evolutionary Computation, 7(3):231–254.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J., Nafploitis, N., and Goldberg, D. E. (1994). A niched pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization. In Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakiela, M. J., Chapman, C., Duda, J., Adewuya, A., and abd Saitou, K. (2000). Continuum structural topology design with genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 186:339–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, J. and Corne, D. (1999). The pareto archived evolution strategy: A new baseline algorithm for multiobjective optimisation. In Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway: New Jersey: IEEE Service Center, pages 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, K. (1999). Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmee, I. C., Cvetkovic, D., Watson, A. H., and Bonham, C. R. (2000). Multiobjective satisfaction within an interactive evolutionary design environment. Evolutionary Computation, 8(2):197–222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandgren, E., Jensen, E., and Welton, J. (1990). Topological design of structural components using genetic optimization methods. In Proceedings of the Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pages 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, P. and Yang, J. B. (1998). Multiple criteria decision support in engineering design. Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, N. and Deb, K. (1995). Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 2:221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation, and application. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler, E. (1999). Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Methods and applications. Doctoral thesis ETH NO. 13398, Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L. (1998). An evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: The strength Pareto approach. Technical Report No. 43 (May 1998), Zürich: Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deb, K., Goel, T. (2003). Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Engineering Shape Design. In: Evolutionary Optimization. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 48. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48041-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48041-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7654-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48041-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics