Skip to main content

Reconstructing the Subject

Kurt Danziger and The Revisionist Project in Historiographies of Psychology

  • Chapter
Rediscovering the History of Psychology

Part of the book series: History and Philosophy of Psychology ((HPPS))

  • 729 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ankersmit, F. R. (1996). Aesthetic politics: Political philosophy beyond fact and value. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankersmit, F. R. (2002). Representational democracy: An aesthetic approach to conflict and compromise. Common Knowledge, 8(1), 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M. G. (1993). Rhetoric, society, and the historiography of psychology. In H. V. Rappard, P. van Strien, L. P. Mos & W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol. 8 (pp. 49–57). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1961). Psychologist at large. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1924). Speculum mentis. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1946). The idea of history. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1965). Essays in the philosophy of history, edited with an introduction by W. Debbins. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, J. & Costal, A. (2000). R. G. Collingwood and the idea of a historical psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10, 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990a). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990b). The social context of research practice and the history of psychology. In W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, R. van Hezewijk & S. Terwee (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology, Vol. II (pp. 297–303). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1993a). Psychological objects, practice, and history. In H. V. Rappard, P. van Strien, L. P. Mos & W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol. 8 (pp. 15–47). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1993b). History, practice, and psychological objects: Reply to commentators. In H. V. Rappard, P. van Strien, L. P. Mos & W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol. 8 (pp. 71–84). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1994). Does the history of psychology have a future? Theory & Psychology, 4, 467–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997a). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997b). The future of psychology’s history is not its past: A reply to Rappard. Theory & Psychology, 7, 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1998). On historical scholarship: A reply to Dehue. Theory & Psychology, 8, 669–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehue, T. (1998). Community historians and the dilemma of rigor vs relevance: Acomment on Danziger and Van Rappard. Theory & Psychology, 8, 653–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Genovese, E. & Lasch-Quinn, E. (Eds.) (1999). Reconstructing history. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L. J. (1970). Collingwood’s theory of historical knowing. History and Theory, 9, 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1994). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 351–383). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, H. H. (1987). Historical foundations of modern psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losee, J. (1980). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkreel, R. A. (1992). Dilthey: Philosopher of the human studies. Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. (1993). Contextualizing Danziger within sociological theory. In H. V. Rappard, P. van Strien, L. P. Mos & W. J. Baker (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol. 8 (pp. 65–70). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mos, L. P. (1996). Immanent critique of experience: Dilthey’s hermeneutics. In C. Tolman, F. Cherry, R. van Hezewijk, & I. Lubek (Eds.), Problems of theoretical psychology (pp. 368–377). Toronto: Captus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappard, J. F. H. van (1997). History of psychology turned inside(r) out: A comment on Danziger. Theory & Psychology, 7, 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative, Vol. 1. (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and narrative, Vol. 3. (K. Blamey & D. Pellauer, trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, H. J. (1992). Deconstructing the subject: Banishing the Ghost of Boring. [Review of Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research]. Contemporary Psychology, 37, 629–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, H. J. (1996). Theory & practice. In C. Tolman, F. Cherry, R. v. Hezewijk, & I. Lubek (Eds.), Problems of Theoretical Psychology (pp. 24–32). Toronto: Captus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, H. J. (2000). Theoretical Psychology. In K. Pawlik & M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), International Handbook of Psychology (pp. 551–569). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, H. J. (2003). Retrieving the past for the future: Boundary maintenance in historical and theoretical psychology. In D. B. Hill and M. J. Krall (Eds.), About psychology: Essays at the crossroads of history, theory, and philosophy (pp. 147–163). New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, H. J., Lubek, I. & Radtke, H. L. (2000). Strains in experimental social psychology: A textual analysis of the development of experimentation in social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, W. B. (1979). Notes on the methodology of scientific research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1973). Metahistory. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1978). Tropics of discourse. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stam, H.J. (2005). Reconstructing the Subject. In: Brock, A.C., Louw, J., van Hoorn, W. (eds) Rediscovering the History of Psychology. History and Philosophy of Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48031-X_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics