Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahmed, A. and Pollitt, A. (2000). Observing context in action. Paper presented at the IAEA Conference, Jerusalem, May 2000. [Available from the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate website, www.ucles.org.uk.]
Aikenhead, G. (1994). What is STS teaching? In J. Solomon and G. Aikenhead (eds.), STS Education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
AQA (1999). Specification for science for public understanding. Assessment and Qualifications Alliance.
American Chemical Society [ACS] (2001a). ChemCom: chemistry in the community (Fourth Edition). W. H. Freeman.
American Chemical Society [ACS] (2001b). Chemistry in context (Third Edition,). New York: McGraw Hill.
Barber, M. (2000). A comparison of NEAB and Salters A-level chemistry: student. views and achievements. University of York, Unpublished MA thesis.
Barker, V., & Millar, R. (2000). Students’ reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: what changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 22 (11), 1171–1200.
Bennett, J. M. (forthcoming). Teaching and learning science: a guide to recent research and its applications.
Borgford, C. L. (1995). The Salters’s science materials: a study of teachers’ use and areas of focus. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of York, UK.
Burkitbayev, M. (2001). Use of the innovative textbook’ salters advanced chemistry’ in Kazakhstan. Personal communication.
Chemlinks Coalition (2000). ChemConnections modules. New York: John Wiley.
Department for Education and Employment (1999). Science in the National Curriculum. London: HMSO.
Dlamini, B., Lubben, F., & Campbell, B. (1994). Teacher growth through curriculum renewal: an African experience. In M. J. Glencross (ed.). Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and science Education (SAARMSE) (pp. 94–102). University of Durban-Westville, South Africa.
George, J., & Lubben, F. (in press). Facilitating teachers’ professional growth through their involvement in creating context-based materials in science. Paper accepted for publication in the International Journal of Educational Development.
Gutwill-Wise, J. (2001). The Impact of active and context-based learning in introductory chemistry courses: An early evaluation of the modular approach. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(5), 684–690.
Holman, J. (1990). Broadening from within. Education in Science.
Holman, J. (1997). The National Curriculum: a golden opportunity for scientific literacy? In W. Gräber (ed), Scientific Literacy. Kiel: IPN.
Hunt, A., & Millar, R. (2000). Science for public understanding. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
IPN (2000). Chemie im context. Kiel: IPN.
Key, M.E. (1998). Student perceptions of chemical industry: influences of course syllabi, teachers, first hand experience. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of York, UK.
Millar, R.H. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.
Parvin, J. (1999). Children challenging industry: the research report. A study of the effects of industry-based science activities on the views of primary school. children and their teachers of industry and science. York: University of York.
Pilling, G., Holman, J., & Waddington, D. (2001). The Salters experience. Education in Chemistry, 38(5), 131–136.
Ramsden, J. M. (1992). If it’s enjoyable, is it science? School Science Review, 73(265), 65–71.
Ramsden, J.M. (1994). Context and activity-based science: some teachers’ views of the effects on pupils. School Science Review, 75(272), 7–14.
Ramsden, J.M. (1997). How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 697–710.
Royal Society of Chemistry (1998). Research in assessment XIII: an updated report. on the skills test survey of chemistry degree course entrants. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Sutman, F., & Bruce, M. (1992). Chemistry in the community — ChemCom: a five-year evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(7), 564–567.
Tal, R. T. Dori, Y.J., & Keiny, S. (2001). Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum development — the STEMS project approach. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 247–262.
University of York Science education group [UYSEG] (2000). Salters advanced chemistry: chemical storylines, Chemical ideas, activities and assessment and teachers’ guide. York/Oxford: UYSEG/Heinemann Educational.
University of York Science education group [UYSEG] (1990–1992). Science: the Salters’ approach: 22 Unit Guides for Key Stage 4. York/Oxford: UYSEG/Heinemann Educational.
University of York Science education group [UYSEG] (2001). QCA Key Stage 4 Curriculum Models Project. A report to the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority for England and Wales. York: the University of York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bennett, J., Holman, J. (2002). Context-Based Approaches to the Teaching of Chemistry: What are They and What Are Their Effects?. In: Gilbert, J.K., De Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D.F., Van Driel, J.H. (eds) Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47977-X_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47977-X_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1112-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47977-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive