This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arizona Department of Health Services. “Health Risk Assessment of Nogales Wash.” Arizona Department of Health Services Prevention Bulletin 7, pp. 1–2, 1993.
Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). Third Management Plan for Santa Cruz Active Management Area: 2000–2010. Nogales, AZ: Arizona Department of Water Resources, 1999.
Bennett, L., S. Ragland, and P. Yolles. “Facilitating International Agreements through an Interconnected Game Approach: The Case of River Basins,” in D. Parker and Y. Tsur. Decentralization and Coordination of Water Resource Management, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, pp. 61–85.
Binmore, K., A. Rubinstein, and A. Wolinsky. “he Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling.” Rand Journal of Economics, 17, pp. 176–88, 1986.
Brown, C. P. and S. Mumme. “Applied and Theoretical Aspects of Binational Watershed Councils (Consejos de Cuencas) in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands.” Natural Resources Journal 40 (2000), pp. 895–929.
de Janvry, A. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.
Environmental Protection Agency. Border Infrastructure Grants Program Affordability Guidelines. Memorandum from Robert Perciasepe, Assistant Administrator, Office of Water to Regional Administrators, Region IX and Region VI, March 28, 1997.
Environmental Protection Agency. Colonias Facts. Washington, DC: USEPA, Office of International Affairs, March 1998a.
Environmental Protection Agency. U.S — Mexico Border XXI. Washington, DC: USEPA, 199_.
Environmental Protection Agency. BECC and NADBank: Promoting Environmental Infrastructure on the U.S.-Mexico Border. Washington, DC: USEPA, Office of International Affairs, July 1998b.
Frisvold, G. and M.F. Caswell, “A Bargaining Model of Water Quality and Quantity.” In A. Dinar and E. Loehman (eds.) Water Quantity / Quality Disputes and their Resolution. Westport, CT: Praeger Press, 1995, pp. 399–407.
Frisvold, G.B. and M.F. Caswell. “Transboundary Water Management: Game-theoretic Lessons for Projects on the U.S.-Mexico Border.” Agricultural Economics 24 (2000), pp. 101–111.
Galhardi, R. “Maquiladora: Prospects of Regional Integration and Globalization.” Employment and Training Papers No. 12. Geneva: International Labor Office, 1997.
Ganster, P. “Environmental Issues of the California-Baja California Border Region,” Border Environment Research Reports, No. 1, San Diego: Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy, 1996.
Groundwater Users Advisory Council (GUAC), Santa Cruz Active Management Area. Meeting Minutes. Nogales, AZ, October 18, 2000.
Hamson, D.V. “The Santa Cruz River Basin: Best Practices for Maintaining its Health,” Border Environment Research Reports, No. 4, San Diego: Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy, 1996.
Hayes, D.F. “Drinking Water Quality in the U.S. / Mexico Border Region: Assessment of Water Supplies, Treatment and Distribution,” Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy: 1996 Technical Conference Proceedings. San Diego: Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy, 1996.
Herzog, L. “International Boundary Cities: The Debate on Transfrontier Planning in Two Border Regions,” Natural Resource Journal 31, pp. 589–608, 1991.
Hinojosa-Ojeda, R. “From NAFTA Debate to Democratic and Sustainable Integration: Potential Implications of the North American Development Bank,” mimeo. School of Public Policy and Social Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 1999.
Ingram, H. and D. White. “International Boundary and Water Commission: An Institutional Mismatch for Resolving Transboundary Water Problems,” Natural Resources Journal 33, pp. 153–176, 1993.
Ingram, H., L. Milich, and R. G. Varady. “Managing Transboundary Resources: Lessons from Ambos Nogales,” Environment 36, pp. 6–9, 28–38, 1994.
International Border Water Commission (IBWC). Recommendations for the Solution of the Border Water Sanitation Problem of Naco, Arizona-Naco, Sonora. Minute 273. March 19, 1987.
Johnstone, N. “International Trade, Transfrontier Pollution, and Environmental Cooperation: A Case Study of the Mexican-American Border Region,” Natural Resources Journal 35, pp. 33–62, 1995.
Kishel, J. “Lining the All-American Canal: Legal Problems and Physical Solutions,” Natural Resources Journal, 33, pp. 697–726.
La Rue, S. “U.S. Water-Saving Plan Roils Mexican Officials: Lined Canal Would Harm Mexican Farmers They Say,” San Diego Union-Tribune, pp. A3, February 28, 1999.
Liverman, D., R. Merideth, and A. Holdsworth, L. Cervera, and F. Lara. An Assessment of the Water Resources n the San Pedro River and Santa Cruz River Basins Arizona and Sonora: A Report to the Commission on Environmental Cooperation. Tucson, AZ: Latin America Area Center and Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, 1997.
Liverman, D., R.G. Varady, O. Sanchez. “Environmental Issues along the United States — Mexico Border: Drivers of Change and the Response of Citizens and Institutions.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24 (1999), pp. 607–43.
Martinez Engineering Group. El Paso County Comprehensive Colonia Study and Plan 2000. Report Presented to Commissioners Court of the County of El Paso. El Paso, TX, December 2000.
Milich, L. and R. Varady. “Openness, Sustainability, and Public Participation: New Designs for Transboundary River Basin Institutions,” Journal of Environment and Development 8 (1999), 258–306.
Morehouse, B.J. R.H. Carter, and T.W. Sprouse. “The Implications of Sustained Drought for Transboundary Water Management in Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora.” Natural Resources Journal 40, pp.783–817, 2000
Mumme, S. “New Directions in United States-Mexican Transboundary Environmental Management: A Critique of Current Proposals,” Natural Resources Journal 32, pp. 539–62, 1992
Mumme, S. “Innovation and Reform in Transboundary Resource Management: A Critical Look at the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico,” Natural Resources Journal 33, pp. 93–120, 1993.
Nash, J. “Two-person Cooperative Games,” Econometrica 21, pp. 128–140.
North American Development Bank. Current Status and Outlook. San Antonio, TX: NADBank, 1998.
North American Development Bank. Border Environmental Infrastructure Fund. San Antonio, TX: NADBank, 1998.
Ragland, S. International Environmental Externalities and Interconnected Games. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1995.
Reed, C. Expanding the Mandate: Should the Border Environmental Cooperation Commission and North American Development Bank Go Beyond Water, Wastewater and Solid Waste Management Projects and How Do They Get There? Austin, TX: Texas Center for Policy Studies, 2000.
Sprouse, T., D. Cory, and R. Varady. “Aquifer Contamination and Safe Drinking Water: The Recent Santa Cruz County Experience,” Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest, Vol. 26. Proceedings of the 1996 meeting of the Arizona Section, American Water Resource and Hydrology Section, Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, 1996.
Szekely, A. “Establishing a Region for Ecological Cooperation in North America,” Natural Resources Journal 32, pp. 563–622, 1992.
Szekely, A. “Emerging Boundary Environmental Challenges and Institutional Issues: Mexico and the United States,” Natural Resources Journal 33, pp. 33–46, 1993a.
Szekely, A. “How to Accommodate an Uncertain Future into Institutional Responsiveness and Planning: The Case of Mexico and the United States,” Natural Resources Journal 33, pp. 397–403, 1993b.
Texas A&M University. Colonias Factbook. Texas A&M University, College of Architecture, Center for Housing and Urban Development, 1998.
Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy. State of the U.S.— Mexico Border Environment: Report of the U.S. EPA U.S.— Mexico Border Environmental Plan Public Advisory Committee. Tucson, AZ: Udall Center, University of Arizona, 1993.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). U.S.-Mexico Border: Despite Some Progress, Environmental Infrastructure Challenges Remain. (GAO/NSIAD-00-26), March 2000.
Varady, R. G., D. Colnic, R. Merideth, and T. Sprouse. “The U.S.-Mexico Border Environment Cooperation Commission: Collected Perspectives on the First Two Years,” Journal of Borderlands Studies 11, pp. 89–119, 1997.
Varady, R. G., H. Ingram, and L. Milich. “The Sonoran Pimería Alta: Shared Environmental Problems and Challenges. Journal of the Southwest 37, pp. 102–122, 1995.
Varady, R. G., and M. D. Mack. “Transboundary Water Resources and Public Health in the U.S.—Mexico Border Region,” Journal of Environmental Health 57, pp. 8–14, 1995.
von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1944.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frisvold, G., Caswell, M. (2003). Financing Bilateral Water Projects on the U.S.-Mexico Border: Past, Present and Future. In: Batema, J.J., Fernandez, L., Carson, R.T. (eds) Both Sides of the Border. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47961-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47961-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7126-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47961-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive