This work was supported by grant no. SBR #9515451 from the Law and Social Science Program at the National Science Foundation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blankertz, L. (1998). The value and practicality of deliberate sampling for heterogeneity: A critical multiplist perspective. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 307–324.
Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91.
Bull-Kovera, M. & Borgida, E. (1998). Expert scientific testimony on child witnesses in the age of Daubert. In S. J. Ceci and H. Hembrooke (Eds.), Expert witnesses in child abuse cases: What can and should be said in court (pp. 185–215). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Callahan, L. A. & Silver, E. (1998). Factors associated with the conditional release of persons acquitted by reason of insanity: A decision tree approach. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 147–163.
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues in field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993).
Faigman. D. L. (1995). The evidentiary status of social science under Daubert: Is it “scientific,” “technical,” or “other” knowledge? Psychology, PublicPolicy, and Law, 1, 960–979.
Finkel, N., Fulero, S., Haugaard, J., Levine, & Small, M. (2001). Everyday life and legal values: Aconcept paper. aw and Human Behavior, 25, 109–123.
Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923).
Gorman, B. J. (1999). Facilitated communication: Rejected in science, accepted in court—A case study and analysis of the use of FC evidence under Frye and Daubert. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 517–541.
Greene, E., Johns, M., & Bowman, J. (1999). The effects of injury severity on jury negligence decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 675–693.
Grove W. M., & Barden R. C. (1999). Protecting the integrity of the legal system: The admissibility of testimony from mental health expertsunder Daubert/Kumho analyses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 224–242.
Gutheil, T. G., & Stein, M. D. (2000). Daubert-based gatekeeping and psychiatric/psychological testimony in court: Review and proposal. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 28, 235–251.
Gutheil T. G., & Sutherland, P. K. (1999). Forensic assessment, witness credibility and the search for truth through expert testimony in the courtroom. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 27, 289–312.
Haugaard, J. (1999). Personal Communication.
Heath, I. (2000). Does expert witness testimony regarding the child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome (CSAAS) meet the Daubert standard for admissibility of expert testimony? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 248–249.
Houts, A. C., Cook, T. D., & Shadish, W. R. (1986). The person-situation debate: A critical multiplist perspective. Journal of Personality, 54, 52–105.
Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. D. (1999). The problem of “helpfulness” in applying Daubert to expert testimony: Child custody determinationsin family law as an exemplar. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 78–99.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Kumho Tire Co. Ltd. v. Carmichael, 119 S.Ct. 1167 (1999).
Lachman, R., Lachman, T., & Butterfield, S. (1979). Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing. Orlando, Fl; Academic Press, Inc.
Lipton, J. P. (1999). The use and acceptance of social science evidence in business litigation after Daubert. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 59–77.
Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2000). Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 337–358.
Melton, G. B. (1990). Law, science, humanity: The normative foundation of social science in law. Lawand Human Behavior, 14, 315–332.
Melton, G. B. (1988). The Significance of law in the everyday lives of children and families. Georgia Law Review, 22, 851–895.
Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1994). Social science in law: Cases and materials (3rd ed.). Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
Mott, N. L., Hans, V. P., & Simpson, L. (2000), What’s half a lung worth? Civil jurors’ accounts of their award decision. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 401–420.
Penrod, S. D, Fulero, S. M., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Expert psychological testimony in the UnitedStates: A new playing field? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 65–72.
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2001). “That’s completely obvious...and important”: Lay judgments of social psychological findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 497–505.
Schopp, R. F., Scalora, M. J., & Pearce, M. (1999). Expert testimony and professional judgment: Psychological expertise and commitment as a sexual predator after Hendricks. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 120–174.
Shadish, W. R. (1986). Planned critical multiplism: Some elaborations. Behavioral Assessment, 8, 75–103.
Shaw, J. S., Zerr, T. K., & Woythaler, K. A. (2001). Public eyewitness confidence ratings can differ from those held privately. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 139–152.
Silver, E., Mulvey, E. P., & Monahan, J. (1999). Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients: Toward an ecological approach. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 237–255.
Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D. G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 271–296.
Steadman, H, J., Cocozza, J. J., & Veysey, B. M. (1999). Comparing outcomes for diverted and nondiverted jail detainees with mental illnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 615–627.
Van Koppen, P. J., & Lochun, S. K. (1997). Portraying Perpetrators: The validity of offender descriptions by witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 661–685.
Wiener R. L., & Hurt, L. E. (1999). An interdisciplinary approach to understanding social sexual conduct at work. In R. Wiener & B. Gutek (Eds.), Advances in Sexual Harassment Research, Theory, and Policy. Special Edition of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 556–595.
Wiener, R. L. (1997). From the editor. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 1–3.
Wiener, R.L. (1993). Social analytic jurisprudence and tort law: Social cognition goes to court. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 37, 503–551.
Wiener, R.L. (1990). A psycholegal and empirical approach to the medical standard of care. Nebraska Law Review, 69, 112–157.
Zonana, H. (1994). Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: A new standard for scientific evidence in the courts? Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22, 309–325.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiener, R.L. et al. (2004). Evaluating Published Research in Psychology and Law. In: Taking Psychology and Law into the Twenty-First Century. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 14. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47944-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47944-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46760-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47944-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive