Forensic Psychology

Decades of Progress and Controversy
  • Brent Van Dorsten

Keywords

American Psychological Association Expert Testimony Expert Witness Civil Commitment Forensic Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychological Association (1992, December). Ethical Principle of Psychologists and Code of ConductGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.Google Scholar
  3. Bartol, C.R., & Bartol, A.M. (1999). History of forensic psychology. In A.K. Hess & I.B. Weiner, (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology, 3–23.Google Scholar
  4. Bersoff, D.N., Goodman-Delahunty, J., Gisso, T., Hans, V.P., Poythress, N.G. & Roesch, R.G. (1997). Training in law and psychology: Models from the Villanova conference. American Psychologist, 52, 1301–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackburn, R. (1996). What is forensic psychology? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 3–16.Google Scholar
  6. Bugliosi, V. (1996). Outrage: The Five Reasons O.J. Simpson Got Away With Murder. Dell Publishing: New York.Google Scholar
  7. Butcher, J.N. & Miller, K.B. (1999). Personality assessment in personal injury litigation. In A.K. Hess & I.B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York (pp. 104–126).Google Scholar
  8. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).Google Scholar
  9. Dawes, R.M. (1994). House of Cards: Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth. The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, J., & Olshaker, M. (1997). Journey Into Darkness. Pocket Star Books: New York.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, J., & Olshaker, M. (1995). Mind Hunter: Inside the FBI’s Elite Serial Crime Unit. Pocket Star Books: New York.Google Scholar
  12. Ewing, C.P. (1985). Psychology, Psychiatry, and the Law: A Clinical and Forensic Handbook. Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.: Sarasota, FL.Google Scholar
  13. Faust, D., Hart, T.J., & Guilmette, J. (1988). Pediatric malingering: The capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 578–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faust, D., Hart, T.J., & Guilmette, J., & Arkes, H.R. (1988). Neuropsychologists capacity to detect adolescent malingerers. Professional Psychology — Research and Practice, 19, 432–438.Google Scholar
  15. Faust, D. & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241, 31–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Faust, D. & Ziskin, J., & Hiers J.B. (1991). Brain Damage Claims: Coping with Neuropsychological Evidence. Law and Psychology Press: Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  17. Frye v. United State, 293 Fed. 1013 (D.C. CIR. 1923).Google Scholar
  18. Fulero, S.M., & Finkel, N.J. (1991). Barring ultimate issue testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 5, 495–507.Google Scholar
  19. General Electric v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997).Google Scholar
  20. Grove, W.M., & Meehl, P.E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagan, M.A. (1997). Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice. Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.: New York.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, T. (1989). The Silence of the Lambs. St. Martin’s Press: New York.Google Scholar
  23. Hess, A.K. (1999) Serving as an expert witness. In A.K. Hess & I.B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York (pp.521–555).Google Scholar
  24. Hess, A.K. (1999) Defining forensic psychology. In A.K. Hess & I.B. Weinet (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York (pp.521–555).Google Scholar
  25. Hess A.K., & Weiner, I.B. (1999). The Handbook of Forensic Psychology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins v United States, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 300, 307F.2d 637 (1962).Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, B., Schopp, L.H., & Shigaki, C.L. (2000). Forensic psychological evaluation. In R.G. Frank & Elliott, T.R. (Eds.), Handbook of Rehabilitation Psychology. American Psychological Association: Washington DC.Google Scholar
  28. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, No. 97-1709. (U.S., March 23, 1999).Google Scholar
  29. Loh, W.D. (1981). Perspectives on psychology and law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 314–355.Google Scholar
  30. Melton, G. B., Huss, M.T. & Tomkins, A.J. (1997). Training in forensic psychology and the law. In A.K. Hess & I.B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York (pp. 700–720).Google Scholar
  31. Melton, G.B., Petrilla, J., Poythress, N.G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Law and the mental health professions: An uneasy alliance. Psychological Evaluations for the Courts. The Guilford Press: New York, (pp.3–25).Google Scholar
  32. Ogloff, J.R.P., Tomkins, A.J., & Bersoff, D.N. (1996). Education and training in psychology and law/criminal justice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 200–235.Google Scholar
  33. Otero-Zeno, T.M. & O’Meara, D.P. (1991). Mental injury litigation: The roles of the lawyer and the psychologist. Medical Psychotherapy, 4, 17–26.Google Scholar
  34. Redding, R.E., Floyd, M.Y., & Hawk, G.L. (2001). What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: A survey of the courts and bar. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 583–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991). Law and Human Behavior, 15, 6, 655–665.Google Scholar
  36. Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary (2nd ed.). (1983). New Yort: Simon & Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Stevenson, E.E. (1999). Admissibility of expert testimony after Kumho tire. The Colorado Lawyer, 28, 7, 73–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brent Van Dorsten
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences CenterDenver

Personalised recommendations