Advertisement

Employment and Empowerment of People with Disabilities

A Social Development Perspective
  • Creigs Beverly
  • Ann Rosegrant Alvarez
Part of the Plenum Series in Rehablititation and Health book series (SSRH)

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is clear that people who are physically and mentally challenged in the United States and the world in general—people with disabilities—continue to experience the effects of discrimination, stigmatization, and oppression (Cole, Christ, & Light, 1995; Kopels, 1995). These effects persist in the United States even after the passage of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the case law that has resulted from these statutes (Cole et al., 1995). Globally, they persist in contradiction to principles expressed and espoused by world leaders in many contexts.

The result diminishes the potential and the lives of those with and without disabilities, through literal expenditures and through egregious waste of human capital. A social development approach has much to offer, both in terms of a perspective and by providing concrete examples of how employment opportunities, education, and social services can be combined to create options for those who have been challenged by disabilities, and limited and oppressed by others’ perceptions of them.

Keywords

Social Work Social Development Credit Union Disable Person Gainful Employment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asch, A., & Mudrick, N. (1995). Disability. In Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 752–761). Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ayton-Shenker, D. (1995, March). The challenge of human rights and cultural diversity (pp. 4–5). New York, NY: United Nations National Department of Public Information.Google Scholar
  3. Bickenbach, J. (1993). Physical disability and social policy (pp. 36–37). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, P., & Huston, T. (1993). Assisting the smallest businesses: Assessing micro-enterprise development as a strategy for boosting poor communities, an interim report. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, B. S., Christ, C. C., & Light, T. R. (1995). Social work education and students with disabilities: Implications of Section 504 and the ADA. Journal of Social Work Education, 31(2), 261–268.Google Scholar
  6. Condeluci, A. (1995). Interdependence: The route to community (p. XIX). Winter Park, FL: GPO Press.Google Scholar
  7. Driedger, D. (1996). Emerging from the shadows: Women with disabilities organize. In D. Driedger, I. Feika, & E. G. Batres (Eds.), Across borders: Women with disabilities working together. Charlottetown, PEI: Gynergy Books.Google Scholar
  8. Elliott, D. (1993). Social work and social development: Towards an integrative model for social work practice. International Social Work, 36, 21–36.Google Scholar
  9. Estes, R. J. (1992). Internationalizing social work education: A guide to resources for a new century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania School of Social Work.Google Scholar
  10. Estes, R. J. (1993). Toward sustainable development: From theory to practice. Social Development Issues, 15(3), 1–29.Google Scholar
  11. Estes, R. J. (1997). Social work, social development and community welfare enters in international perspective. International Social Work, 40(1), 43–55.Google Scholar
  12. Falk, D. (1984). The social development paradigm. Social Development Issues, 8(3), 4–14.Google Scholar
  13. Gott, W., Kilpartick, A., & Nackerud, L. (1998). Social development and social constructionism: Strangers or bedfellows? Social Development Issues, 20(1), 17–19.Google Scholar
  14. Jansen, G. G., & Pippard, J. L. (1998). The Grameen Bank in Bangladesh: Helping poor women with credit for self-employment. Journal of Community Practice, 5(1/2), 103–123.Google Scholar
  15. Kamaluddin, S. (1993, March 18). Lender with a mission. Bangladesh’s Grameen bank targets poorest of the poor. Far Eastern Economic Review, 156(11), 38–40.Google Scholar
  16. Kopels, S. (1995). The Americans with Disabilities Act: A tool to combat poverty. Journal of Social Work Education, 31(3), 337–346.Google Scholar
  17. Levy, D. (1994). Conceptual objections. Errors in understanding. In Kirk & Einbinders (Eds.), Controversial issues in mental health. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  18. Lowe, G. R. (1995). Social development. In Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 2168–2173). Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mechanic, D. (1989). Mental health and social policy (pp. 125, 204-206). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Midgley, J. (1993). Ideological roots of social development strategies. Social Development Issues, 15(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  21. Midgley, J. (1994). The challenge of social development: Their third world and ours—1993 Daniel S. Sanders Peace and Social Justice Lecture. Social Development Issues, 16(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  22. Nagler, M. (Ed.) (1990). Perspective on disability. Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.Google Scholar
  23. National Institute of Mental Health (1997). Mental illness in America. The National Institute of Mental Health Agenda. MD: Author.Google Scholar
  24. Raheim, S. (1996). Micro-enterprise as an approach for promoting economic development in social work: Lessons from the self-employment investment demonstration. International Social Work, 39, 69–82.Google Scholar
  25. Seipel, M. O. (1994). Disability: An emerging global challenge. International Social Work, 37(2), 165.Google Scholar
  26. Shapiro, J. (1993). No pity (pp. 36–37). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  27. Sherraden, M. (1991). Assets and the poor: A new American welfare policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  28. Skarnulis (Ed) (1999). Who shall survive? Ethical decision making with people who have disabilities. In Ramanathan & Link (Eds.), All other futures: Principles and resources for social work practice in a global era (pp. 84–87). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  29. Social Legislation (1990). The Americans with Disability Act of 1990. Washington. Social Legislation Bulletin, 31(40), 157–160.Google Scholar
  30. Stroud, J. (1999, June 11). Mental illness is not at last. Detroit Free Press, p. A11.Google Scholar
  31. United Nations (1986). Disability situation, strategy and policies. New York, NY: Author.Google Scholar
  32. United Nations (1990). Disability statistics compendium. New York, NY: Author.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Education and Labor (1990, May 1). (House Report No. 101–485 (11), to accompany House Report No. 2273 (101st) (Congress, 2nd Session)). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  34. World Summit for Social Development (1996, June 12). Report of the World Summit for Social Development: Copenhagen, 6–12 March 1995. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Creigs Beverly
    • 1
  • Ann Rosegrant Alvarez
    • 1
  1. 1.Wayne State University School of Social WorkDetroit

Personalised recommendations