Shifts in Meaning During Transitions

Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 27)


Mathematics Teacher Cultural Capital Mathematics Classroom Mathematical Practice Immigrant Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abreu, G. de (1993). The relationship between home and school mathematics in a farming community in rural Brazil. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, D.W. (1998). Education for extinction: American Indians and the boarding school experience, 1875–1928. Harvard Educational Review, 68(2), 263–264 (book notes).Google Scholar
  3. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101–139.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, A.J. (1985). The social construction of meaning — A significant development for mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics 5(1), 24–28.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, A.J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, A.J. (1991). Mathematical values in the teaching process. In A.J. Bishop, S. Mellin-Olsen, & J. van Dormolen (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge: Its growth through teaching, pp. 195–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1995). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Civil, M. (1995). Connecting home and school: Funds of knowledge for mathematics teaching. In B. Denys and P. Laridon (Eds.), Working group on cultural aspects in the learning of mathematics: Some current developments, pp. 18–25. Monograph following the 19th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Recife, July 1995.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, D.J. (1998). Studying the classroom negotiation of meaning: Complementary accounts methodology. In A. Teppo (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in mathematics education. Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Monograph 9.Google Scholar
  10. Cobb, P. & Yackel, E. (1995). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Plenary address, in D. Owens & G. Millsapps (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
  11. Ellerton, N.F. & Clarkson, PC. (1996). Language factors in mathematics teaching and learning. In A.J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education, pp. 987–1033. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  12. Gee, J.P (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  13. Grenfell, M., & James, D. (Eds.) (1998). Bourdieu and education: Acts of practical theory. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133–150.Google Scholar
  15. Moschkovich, J. (1999). Supporting the participation of English language learners in mathematical discourse. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
  16. Nieto, S. (1996). Affirming diversity. The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. White Plains, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Pimm, D. (1995). Symbols and meanings in school mathematics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Presmeg, N.C. (1988). School mathematics in culture-conflict situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 163–177. Special edition.Google Scholar
  19. Presmeg, N.C. (1996). Ethnomathematics and academic mathematics: the didactic interface. Paper presented in Working Group 21, The Teaching of Mathematics in Different Cultures, Subgroup 2, Preparing Teachers to Teach Diversity. Eighth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seville, Spain, July 14–21, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. Presmeg, N.C. (1998). Ethnomathematics in teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reay, D. (1998). Cultural reproduction: Mothers’ involvement in their children’s primary schooling. In M. Grenfell & D. James (Eds.), Bourdieu and education: Acts of practical theory. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  22. Saxe, G.B. (1991). Culture and cognitive development. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Spindler, G.D. (1974). Education and cultural process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Wilson.Google Scholar
  24. Valdés, G. (1998). The world outside and inside schools: Language and immigrant children. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 4–18.Google Scholar
  25. Walkerdine, V. (1982). From context to text: A psychosemiotic approach to abstract thought. In M. Beveridge, (Ed.), Children thinking through language, pp. 129–155. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  26. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Difference, cognition, and mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(3), 51–56.Google Scholar
  28. Walkerdine, V. (1997). Redefining the subject in situated cognition theory. In D. Kirshner & J.A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Illinois State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations