Skip to main content

Making Formative Use of a National Summative Assessment Regime

  • Chapter
Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future

Abstract

While the impact of formative assessment practices on learning outcomes is receiving increasing attention, the dominant function of the statutory assessment system in England and Wales is summative. As authors of the statutory end of Key Stage 2 tests between 1995 and 1999, we are aware of a volume of test performance data generated in the course of the summative regime. Summative performance data are available on the cohort of 600,000 pupils, at age 11, assessed annually. We have further illuminated these data by an annual qualitative re-marking of a sub-sample stratified by three overall achievement levels. We suggest that many test items are analogous to concept probes within the constructivist paradigm. When pupils’ assessed understanding can be mapped onto lines of progression, assessment can have a powerful formative capability in informing classroom teaching and learning practices. The characteristics of test items which may combine summative and formative utility are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy and practice. Vol 5. no 1, 7–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, R. (1995). National Curriculum Assessment: A review of policy 1987–1994. London, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (1989). National Assessment: The APU approach, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.H. (1996). Teaching as a research based profession: possibilities and prospects. Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J. & Novak, J.D. (1976). An assessment of children’s concepts of the earth using structured interviews. Science Education 60,4, 535–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., McGuigan, L., & Hughes, A. (1998). Forces SPACE research report. Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W.F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science 18, 123–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (1996). National curriculum assessment and programmes of study: Validity and impact. British Educational Research Journal Vol 22, no 1, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Russell, T.J., McGuigan, L. (2001). Making Formative Use of a National Summative Assessment Regime. In: Behrendt, H., et al. Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6755-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47639-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics