Abstract
An important element of our theoretical framework for investigating individual learning processes, (von Aufschnaiter & Welzel, 1999) is the distinction between cognitive processes (“every student continuously creates cognitions according to his own actions and perceptions”) and cognitive structures (“tools producing these cognitions”) (ibid.). We then must distinguish between situated activity (construction of meaning) and changes of situated activity (changes in the way of meaning is constructed in similar situations). We pointed out that we do not interpret learning as the acquisition of “new” knowledge but as the development of “new” tools for the construction of this knowledge. Furthermore, we demonstrated that each of a student’s cognitions can be assigned to one of ten levels of complexity and that one kind of learning can be understood as the increase in the average level of complexity of the cognitive processes.
In the first part of this paper, our approach is compared to similar approaches from other groups. It will be stressed that these approaches also distinguish between cognitive processes and cognitive structures and that learning is interpreted as the development of cognitive structures. In the second part, results of a laboratory study will be presented, that show how development of complexity occurs as one kind of conceptual change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adey, P. (1999).Revisiting cognitive conflict, construction, and metaconstruction and discovering metaconstructivism. In M. Komorek et al., Eds., Research in Science Education: Past, Present, and Future. Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (E.S.E.R.A.), Vol. 1 (pp. 58–60). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error, emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.
diSessa, A. A. & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education 20(10), 1155–1192.
Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Piaget, J. & Garcia, R. (1991). Toward a Logic of Meanings. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pöppel, E. (1994). Temporal mechanisms in perception. International Review of Neurobiology 37, 185–202.
von Aufschnaiter, S. & Welzel, M. (1999). Individual learning processes-a research program with focus on the complexity of situated cognition. In M. Bandiera et al., Eds., Research in Science Education in Europe (pp. 209–215. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Aufschnaiter, S. (2001). Development of Complexity through Dealing with Physical Qualities: One Type of Conceptual Change?. In: Behrendt, H., et al. Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6755-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47639-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive