Economic Perspectives on Software Design: PC Operating Systems and Platforms
Part of the The Milken Institute Series on Financial Innovation and Economic Growth book series (MILK, volume 2)
KeywordsMarginal Cost Software Product Line Consumer Welfare Personal Computer System Customer Valuation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adams, William James, Yellen, Janet I. 1976. “Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, no. 3, pp. 475–498.Google Scholar
- Bakos, Yannis, Brynjolfsson, Erik. 1999. “Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency,” Management Science, 45, no. 12 (December).Google Scholar
- Bakos, Yannis, Brynjolfsson, Erik. 2000. “Bundling and Competition on the Internet: Aggregation Strategies for Information Goods,” Marketing Science (January).Google Scholar
- Baldwin, Carliss Y., Clark, Kim B. 2000. Design Rules: Volume 1, The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Besen, Stanley, Farrell, Joseph. 1994. “Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, no. 2.Google Scholar
- Boyce, Jim. 1998. Inside Windows 98. New Riders Publishing.Google Scholar
- Carlton, Dennis W., Waldman, Michael. 2000. “The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving Industries,” George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, Working Paper No. 145 (March). Available at http://gsb-www.uchicago.edu/research/cses/WorkingPapersPDF's/145.pdf.
- Coase, R.H. 1972. “Durability and Monopoly,” Journal of Law and Economics, 15, pp. 149–149.Google Scholar
- Computer Language Company. 1999. Computer Desktop Encyclopedia. Point Pleasant, Pennsylvania. Searchable at http://www.computerlanguage.com/sitemain/content.html.Google Scholar
- Cusumano, Michael A., Selby, Richard W. 1995. Microsoft Secrets. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Cusumano, Michael A., Yoffie, David B. 1998. Competing on Internet Time: Lessons from Netscape and its Battle with Microsoft. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Davis, Steven J., MacCrisken, Jack, Murphy, Kevin M. 1999. “The Evolution of the PC Operating System: An Economic Analysis of Software Design,” June 29. Available at http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/steven.davis/research.
- Davis, Steven J., Murphy, Kevin M. 2000. “A Competitive Perspective on Internet Explorer,” American Economic Review, 90, no. 2, pp. 184–187. Republished in expanded form with mathematical supplement at http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/steven.davis/research.Google Scholar
- Davis, Steven J., Murphy, Kevin M., Topel, Robert H. 2001. “Entry, Pricing and Product Design in an Initially Monopolized Market.” Available at http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/steven.davis/research.
- Easterbrook, Frank H. 2000. “Information and Antitrust.” Keynote address delivered at a symposium on “Antitrust in the Information Age” at the University of Chicago on October 29, 1999. Revised version is dated October 4, 2000.Google Scholar
- Economides, Nicholas. 2000. “The Microsoft Antitrust Case,” Working Paper 2000-09, Stern School of Business, New York University. Available at http://www.stern.nyu.edu/ networks.
- Ellison, Glenn, Fudenberg, Drew. 2000. “The Neo-Luddite’s Lament: Excessive Upgrades in the Software Industry,” Rand Journal of Economics, 31, no. 2 (Summer), pp. 253–272.Google Scholar
- Evans, David S., Nichols, Albert, Reddy, Bernard. 1999. “The Rise and Fall of Leaders in Personal Computer Software,” National Economic Research Associates. Available at http://www.neramicrosoft.com/NeraDocuments/Analyses.
- Evans, David S., Nichols, Albert, Schmalensee, Richard. 2001. “An Analysis of the Government’s Case in U.S. v. Microsoft,” Antitrust Bulletin, 46, no. 2 (Summer).Google Scholar
- Evans, David S., Schmalensee, Richard. 2001. “Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive Industries,” NBER Working Paper 8268 (May).Google Scholar
- Farrell, Joseph, Katz, Michael L. 2000. “Innovation, Rent Extraction, and Integration in Systems Markets,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 48, no. 4 (December), pp. 413–432.Google Scholar
- Fisher, Franklin M., Rubinfeld, Daniel L. 2000. “United States v. Microsoft: An Economic Analysis,” in Did Microsoft Harm Consumers? Two Opposing Views. Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.Google Scholar
- Fudenberg, Drew, Tirole, Jean. 1998. “Upgrades, Trade-Ins and Buybacks,” Rand Journal of Economics, 29, no. 2 (Summer).Google Scholar
- Gans, Joshua S., Hsu, David H., Stern, Scott. 2000. “When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction?” NBER Working Paper 7851.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, Richard J., Katz, Michael L. 2001. “An Economist’s Guide to U.S. v. Microsoft,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, no. 2 (Spring), pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
- Gookin, Dan. 1992. “Windows 3.1 vs. OS/2 2.0,” InfoWorld.Google Scholar
- Hylton, Keith N., Salinger, Michael. 2001. “Tying Law and Policy: A Decision Theoretic Approach,” Boston University School of Law Working Paper Series, Law and Economics Working Paper No. 01-04. Available at http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/papers.
- Ichbiah, Daniel, Knepper, Susan L. 1991. The Making of Microsoft. Prima Publishing.Google Scholar
- Katz, Michael, Shapiro, Carl. 1994. “Systems Competition and Network Effects,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, no. 2.Google Scholar
- Katz, Michael L., Shapiro, Carl. 1999. “Antitrust in Software Markets,” in Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace, Jeffrey A. Eisenach and Thomas M. Lenards, editors. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers for the Progress & Freedom Foundation.Google Scholar
- Khanna, Tarun, Yoffie, David. 1996. “Microsoft, 1995,” Harvard Business School Case Study 9-795-147.Google Scholar
- Klein, Benjamin. 1999. “Microsoft’s Use of Zero Price Bundling to Fight the Browser Wars,” in Competition, Convergence and the Microsoft Monopoly, Jeffrey A. Eisenach and Thomas M. Lenard, editors. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers for the Progress & Freedom Foundation.Google Scholar
- Klein, Benjamin. 2001. “The Microsoft Case: What Can a Dominant Firm Do to Defend Its Market Position?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, no. 2 (Spring), pp. 45–62.Google Scholar
- Liebowitz, Stanley J., Margolis, Stephen E. 1999. Winners, Losers and Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology. Oakland, California: The Independent Institute.Google Scholar
- Markoff, A. 1996. “Tomorrow, the World Wide Web,” The New York Times, July 16, p. D1.Google Scholar
- McAfee, R., Preston, J. McMillan, Whinston, Michael D. 1989. “Multiproduct Monopoly, Commodity Bundling, and Correlation of Values,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104 (May), pp. 371–384.Google Scholar
- McCartney, Laton. 1986. “The Pros and Cons of Going Multi-Vendor (Practicality of Companies Utilizing More Than One Vendor for Computer Systems),” Dun’s Business Month, 128 (November), 93.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. 1995. “Microsoft Developer Relations: Proving Microsoft’s Commitment to Third Parties,” Microsoft Corporation White Paper.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. 1998. Microsoft Internet Explorer Resource Kit. Microsoft Press.Google Scholar
- Posner, Richard. 2000. “Antitrust in the New Economy.” Address delivered to a conference on antitrust sponsored by the American Law Institute-American Bar Association Committee on Continuing Professional Education, September 14, 2000, New York, and published in Tech Law Journal. Available at http://www.techlawjournal.com/atr/-2000914posner.asp.
- Quarterman, John S., Wilhelm, Susanne. 1993. UNIX, POSIX, and Open Systems: The Open Standards Puzzle. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Ramstad, Evan. 1998. “PC Makers Hunt for Gold in Internet Hookups,” The Wall Street Journal, August 12, Page B1.Google Scholar
- Reid, Robert H. 1997. Architects of the Web: 1,000 Days that Built the Future of Business. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schmalensee, Richard L. 1984. “Gaussian Demand and Commodity Bundling,” Journal of Business, 57 (January), S211–S230.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, Carl, Varian, Hal R. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Stigler, George J. 1963. “United States v. Loew’s, Inc.: A Note on Block Booking,” Supreme Court Review, pp. 152–157.Google Scholar
- Tirole, Jean. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Vickers, John. 1986. “The Evolution of Market Structure When There Is a Sequence of Innovations,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, no. 1, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
- Whinston, Michael D., 1990, “Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion,” American Economic Review, 80, no. 4 (September), pp. 837–859.Google Scholar
- Wildstrom, Stephen H. 1998. “Build Your Own Browser,” Business Week, July 20, p. 17.Google Scholar
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002