Skip to main content

Experimental Design for Gene Microarray Experiments and Differential Expression Analysis

  • Chapter
Methods of Microarray Data Analysis II

Abstract

Advances in microarray technology open new challenges in data collection, analysis and interpretation. In this review paper, we focus on issues related to obtaining trustworthy normalized data and results of differential expression analysis. In particular, we briefly summarize discussions on sources of biological and technological variation, experimental design, design of arrays, normalization and error models, differential expression and multiple comparison issues. These issues remain major bottlenecks to developing standards and obtaining useful and applicable results of future analysis such as cluster analysis, network modeling, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amaratunga, D, Cabrera, J. A Resistant Walk through the Microarray Data Minefield. Presentation at Microarray Data Analysis Using Statistics and Standards to Navigate the Microarray Minefield, http://www.healthtech.com/200I/mda/(2001).

  • Baldi, P, Long, AD. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics 17(6) (Jun 2001): 509–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartosiewicz, M, Trounstine, M, Barker, D, Johnston, R, Buckpitt, A. Development of a toxicological gene array and quantitative assessment of this technology. Arch Biochem Biophys 376 (2000): 66–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, DE Jr., Eisen, MB, Boguski, MS. Gene Expression Informatics-It’s All in Your Mine. Nature Genetics 21(supplement) (1999): 51–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini, Y, Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B. 57 (1995): 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bier, FF, Kleinjung, F, Fresenius, J. Feature-size limitations of microarray technology-a critical review. Anal Chem 371(2) (Sep 2001): 151–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brazma, A, Vilo, J. Gene expression data analysis. Microbes Infect 3(10) (Aug 2001): 823–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, CS, Goodwin, PC, Sorger, PK. Image metrics in the statistical analysis of DNA microarray data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(16) (Jul 31 2001): 8944–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G, Berger, RL. Statistical inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, GA, Oliver, B. Sex, flies and microarrays. Nature Genetics 29(4) (Dec 2001): 355–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, WG, Cox, GM. Experimental Designs. New York: Wiley, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, BA, Vitek, O, Black, MA, Tanurdzik, M, Doerge, RW. Proceedings of the 2001 Kansas State University Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudoit, S, Yang, YH, Callow, MJ, Speed, TP. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/users/terry/zarray/TechReport/578.pdf (2000).

  • Efron, B, Tibshirani, R, Storey, JD, Tusher, V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96 (2001): 1151–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elashoff, M. Ensuring Good Microarray Data. Presentation at Microarray Data Analysis Using Statistics and Standards to Navigate the Microarray minefield. http://www.healthtech.com/2001/mda/ (2001).

  • Fisher, RA. The Design of Experiments, 6th edition. London: Oliver and Boyd, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, W, Rogers, WH. Quantile regression as an alternative to robust regression. Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, KR, Zhang, W, Baggerly, KA, Stivers, DN, Coombes, KR, Zhang, W. Microarrays: handling the deluge of data and extracting reliable information. Trends Biotechnol 19(11) (Nov 2001): 463–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houts, T. Towards the quantitative microarray analysis pitfalls and Progress. Presentation at Microarray Data Analysis Using Statistics and Standards to Navigate the Microarray Minefield. http://www.healthtech.com/2001/mda/(2001).

  • Hughes,, TR, Marton, MJ, Jones, AR, Roberts, CJ, Stoughton, R, Armour, CD, Bennett, HA, Coffey, E, Dai, H, He, YD, Kidd, MJ, King, AM, Meyer, MR, Slade, D, Lum, PY, Stepaniants, SB, Shoemaker, DD, Gachotte, D, Chakraburtty, K, Simon, J, Bard, M, Friend, SH. Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles. Cell 102 (2000), 109–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, W, Riley, RM, Wolfinger, RD, White, KP, Passador-Gurgel, G, Gibson, G. The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster Nature Genetics 29(4) (Dec 2001): 389–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnin, N. Personal communication. Clontech, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepler, T, Crosby, L, Morgan, KT. Normalization and analysis of DNA microarray data by self-consistency and local regression. Nucleic Acids Research (Submitted 2000): Santa Fe Institute preprint 00-09-055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, MK, Churchill, GA. Experimental Design for Gene Expression Microarrays. Biostatistics 2(2) (2001), 183–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, MK, Churchill, GA. Statistical Design and the Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Data. Genetical Research 77 (2001): 123–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, MK, Leiter, EH, Picard, L, Churchill, GA. Analysis of a designed microarray experiment. Proceedings of the IEEE-Eurasip Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing Workshop (June 3–6 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, MK, Afshari, CA, Bennett, L, Bushel, P, Martinez, J, Walker, NJ, Churchill, GA. Statistical analysis of a gene expression microarray experiment with replication. Statistica Sinica (to appear 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, MK, Martin, M, Churchill, GA. Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data. J Comput Biol 7(6) (2000): 819–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R, Bassett, G. Regression Quantiles. Econometrica 46 (1978): 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, ML, Kuo, FC, Whitmore, GA, Sklar, J. Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(18) (2000): 9834–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long, AD, Mangalam, HJ, Chan, BY, Tolleri, L, Hatfield, GW, Baldi, P. Improved statistical inference from DNA microarray data using analysis of variance and a Bayesian statistical framework. Analysis of global gene expression in Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem 276(23) (Jun 2001): 19937–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, JC, Gordon, JI. A new approach for filtering noise from high-density oligonucleotide microarray datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 29(15) (Aug 2001): E72–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piantadosi, S. Clinical Trials: A Methodological Perspective, New York: John Wiley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, CC, Hsu, L, Delrow, J, Nelson, PS. Project normal: Defining normal variance in mouse gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(23) (2001): 13266–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, M, Churchill, GA. Estimating the posteriorprobability of differential gene expression from microarray data. Poster: http://www.jax.org/research/churchill/(2000).

  • Samartzidou, H. Validating Microarray Results: Using Control Reagents and Software Tools to Analyse, Standardize, and Compare Microarray Data. Presentation at Microarray Data Analysis Using Statistics and Standards to Navigate the Microarray Minefield http://www.healthtech.com/2001/mda/ (2001).

  • Sen, Churchill, G. A Statistical framework for quantitative trait mapping, Genetics 159 (2001): 371–387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, JD, Tibshirani, R. Estimating false discovery rates under dependence, with applications to DNA microarrays. Submitted to Journal of the American Statistical Society. Technical Report 2001–28, Department of Statistics, Stanford University http://www-stat.stanford.edu/∼jstorey/papers/dep.pdf (2001)

  • Thomas, JG, Olson, JM, Tapscott, SJ, Zhao, LP. An efficient and robust statistical modeling approach to discover differentially expressed genes using genomic expression profiles. Genome Res 11(7) (Jul 2001): 1227–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, GC, Oh, MK, Rohlin, L, Liao, JC, Wong, WH. Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects. Nucleic Acids Res 29(12) (2001): 2549–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X, Ghosh, S, Guo, SW. Quantitative quality control in microarray image processing and data acquisition. Nucleic Acids Res 29(15) (2001): E75–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westfal, P, Young, S. Resampling-based multiple testing. Whiley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, RD, Gibson, G, Wolfinger, ED, Bennett, L, Hamadeh, H, Bushel, P, Afshari, C, Paules, RS. Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray data via mixed models. Journal of Computational Biology 8(6) (2001): 625–637, http://brooks.statgen.ncsu.edu/ggibson/Pubs.htm

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, TD. Analysing gene expression data from DNA microarrays to identify candidate genes. Journal of Pathology 195(1) (Sep 2001): 53–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, MC, Ruan, QG, Yang, JJ, Eckenrode, S, Wu, S, Mclndoe, RA, She, JX. A statistical method for flagging weak spots improves normalization and ratio estimates in microarrays. Physiol Genomics 7(1) (Oct 2001): 45–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, YH, Dudoit, S, Luu, P, Speed, TP1. Normalization for cDNA Microarray Data. San Jose, California: SPIE BiOS, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zien, A, Fluck, J, Zimmer, R, Lengauer, T. Microarrays: How Many Do You Need? Proceedings, RECOMB‘02, to appear: http://cartan.gmd.de/∼zien/paper/recomb02.pdf (2002).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bobashev, G.V., Das, S., Das, A. (2002). Experimental Design for Gene Microarray Experiments and Differential Expression Analysis. In: Lin, S.M., Johnson, K.F. (eds) Methods of Microarray Data Analysis II. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47598-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47598-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7111-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47598-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics