Principles of Research Design


Sampling Unit Snowball Sampling Clinical Epidemiology Asbestos Exposure Rare Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carter, K.C. (1985). Koch’s postulates in relation to the work of Jacob Henle and Edwin Klebs. Medical History, 29, 353–374, 356–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Checkoway, H., & Demers, D.A. (1994). Occupational case—control studies. Epidemiologic Reviews, 16, 151–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Comstock, G.W. (1994). Evaluating vaccination effectiveness and vaccine efficacy by means of case-control studies. Epidemiologic Reviews, 16, 77–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Copeland, K.T., Checkoway, H., McMichael, A.J., & Holbrook, R.H. (1977). Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. American Journal of Epidemiology, 105, 488–495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Coughlin, S.S. (1990). Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 87–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dwyer, D.M., Strickler, H., Goodman, R.A., & Armenian, H.K. (1994). Use of case-control studies in outbreak investigations. Epidemiologic Reviews, 16, 109–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrar, W.B. (1991). Clinical trials: Access and reimbursement. Cancer, 67, 1779–1782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Feldman, F., Finch, M., & Dowd, B. (1989). The role of health practices in HMO selection bias: A confirmatory study. Inquiry, 26, 381–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Felson, D.T. (1992). Bias in meta-analytic research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 885–892.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gore, S.M. (1981). Assessing clinical trials—why randomise? British Medical Journal, 282, 1958–1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray-Donald, K., & Kramer, M.S. (1988). Causality inference in observational vs. experimental studies: An empirical comparison, American Journal of Epidemiology, 127, 885–892.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenland, S. (1977). Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 106, 184–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenland, S., & Robins, J.M. (1985). Confounding and misclassification. American Journal of Epidemiology, 122, 495–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammond, E.C., Selikoff, I.J., & Seidman, H. (1979). Asbestos exposure, cigarette smoking, and death rates. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 330, 473–490.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, A.B. (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hills, M., & Armitage, P. (1979). The two-period cross-over clinical trial. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 8, 7–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jooste, P.L., Yach, D., Steenkamp, H.J., Botha, J.L., & Rossouw, J.E. (1990). Drop-out and newcomer bias in a community cardiovascular follow-up study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 19, 284–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalton, G. (1993). Sampling considerations in research on HIV risk and illness. In D.G. Ostrow & R.C. Kessler (Eds.), Methodological Issues in AIDS Behavioral Research (pp. 53–74). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kelsey, J.L., Thompson, W.D., & Evans, A.S. (1986). Methods in Observational Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Khlat, M. (1994). Use of case-control methods for indirect estimation in demography. Epidemiologic Reviews, 16, 124–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Khoury, M.J., & Beaty, T.H. (1994). Applications of the case-control method in genetic epidemiology. Epidemiologic Reviews, 16, 134–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., & Morgenstern, M. (1982). Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  23. Lasky, T., & Stolley, P.D. (1994). Selection of cases and controls. Epidemiologic Reviews, 16, 6–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Last, J.M., (Ed.). (1988). A Dictionary of Epidemiology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Liberati, A. (1995). “Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century”: Discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 81–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lubin, J.H., & Gail, M.H. (1984). Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies. Biometrics, 40, 63–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mastroianni, A.C., Faden, R., & Federman, D. (Ed.s). (1994). Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies, vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Miettinen, O.S. (1985). The case-control study: Valid selection of subjects. Journal of Chronic Disease, 38, 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morabia, A. (1991). On the origin of Hill’s causal criteria. Epidemiology, 2, 367–369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Morgenstern, H. (1996, Spring). Course Materials, Part II: Class Notes for Epidemiologic Methods II, Epidemiology 201B, 54–82.Google Scholar
  31. Morgenstern, H. (1982). Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. American Journal of Public Health, 72, 1336–1344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Brien, P.C., & Shampo, M.A. (1988). Statistical considerations for performing multiple tests in a single experiment. 5. Comparing two therapies with respect to several endpoints. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 63, 1140–1143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Olkin, I. (1995). Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysis, quoting the National Library of Medicine. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 133–146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosner, F. (1987). The ethics of randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Medicine, 82, 283–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rothman, K.J. (1976). Causes. American Journal of Epidemiology, 104, 587–592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothman, K.J. (1986). Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  37. Sackett, D.L. (1979). Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 32, 51–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sartwell, P.E. (1960). On the methodology of investigations of etiologic factors in chronic disease—further comments. Journal of Chronic Disease, 11, 61–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlesselman, J.J. (1982). Case Control Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Selby, J.V. (1994). Case-control evaluations of treatment and program efficacy. Epidemiologic Reviews, 16, 90–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Senn, S.J. (1991). Falsification and clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 10, 1679–1692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, P.G. (1983). Issues in the design of case-control studies: Matching and interaction effects. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Gezondheidszorg, 61, 755–760.Google Scholar
  43. Sterling, T.D., Weinkam, J.J., & Weinkam, J.L. (1990). The sick person effect. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 141–151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Susser, M. (1991). What is a cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 133, 635–648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wacholder, S., Silverman, D.T., McLaughlin, J.K., & Mandel, J.S. (1992). Selection of controls in case-control studies. III. Design options. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135, 1042–1050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Weed, D.L. (1986). On the logic of causal inference. American Journal of Epidemiology, 123, 965–979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Weiss, N.S. (1994). Application of the case-control method in the evaluation of screening. Epidemiologic Reviews, 16, 102–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Personalised recommendations