Ethical Principles Governing Research Involving Human Participants


Research Participant Ethical Principle Foster Parent Human Participant World Medical Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abt, I. (1903). Spontaneous hemorrhages in newborn children. JAMA, 40, 284–293.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, T.F. (1990). Protectionism and the new research imperative in pediatric AIDS. IRB, 12, 1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Annas, G.J., & Grodin, M.A. (Eds.). (1992). The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Appelbaum, P.S., Lidz, C.W., & Meisel, A. (1991). Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Avins, A.L. & Lo, B. (1989). To tell or not to tell: The ethical dilemmas of HIV test notification in epidemiologic research. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 1544–1548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayer, R., Levine, C. & Murray, T.H. (1984). Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS. IRB, 6, 1–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beauchamp, T.L. (1996). Moral foundations. In S.S. Coughlin & T.L. Beauchamp (Eds.), Ethics and Epidemiology (pp. 24–52). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beauchamp, T.L., & Childress, J.F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Belais, D. (1910). Vivisection animal and human. Cosmopolitan, 50, 267–273.Google Scholar
  10. Benson, P.R., Roth, L.H., Appelbaum, P.S., Lidz, C.W., & Winslade, W.J. (1988). Information disclosure, subject understanding, and informed consent in psychiatric research. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 455–475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bigorra, J. & Banos, J. E. (1990). Weight of financial reward in the decision by medical students and experienced healthy volunteers to participate in clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 38, 443–446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Capron, A.M. (1991). Protection of research subjects: Do special rules apply in epidemiology? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44 (Suppl.), 81S–89S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Castronovo, F.P. Jr. (1993). An attempt to standardize the radiodiagnostic risk statement in an institutional review board consent form. Investigative Radiology, 28, 533–538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Christakis, N.A., & Panner, M.J. (1991). Existing international ethical guidelines for human subjects research: Some open questions. Law, Medicine & Health Care, 19, 214–221.Google Scholar
  15. Classen, W.H. (1986). Institutional review boards: Have they achieved their goal? Medicine and Law, 5, 387–393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooke, R.E. (1994). Vulnerable children. In M.A. Grodin & L.H. Glantz (Eds.), Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics, and Law (pp. 193–214). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coughlin, S. (1996). Ethically optimized study designs in epidemiology. In S.S. Coughlin & T.L. Beauchamp (Eds.), Ethics and Epidemiology (pp. 145–155). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (1991). International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies Geneva: CIOMS.Google Scholar
  19. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), World Health Organization (WHO). (1993). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS and WHO.Google Scholar
  20. Delgado, R., & Leskover, H. (1986). Informed consent in human experimentation: Bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice. UCLA Law Review, 34, 67–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dubler, N.N., & Sidel, V.W. (1989). On research on HIV infection and AIDS in correctional institutions. Milbank Quarterly, 67, 171–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Epstein, L.C., & Lasagna, L. (1969). Obtaining informed consent. Archives of Internal Medicine, 123, 682–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Etheridge, E. (1972). The Butterfly Caste: A Social History of Pellagra. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  24. Glantz, L.H. (1992).The influence of the Nuremberg Code on U.S. statutes and regulations. In G.J. Annas & M.A. Grodin (Eds.), The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation (pp. 183–200). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., & Lerman, C. (1996). Ethical issues in the design and conduct of community-based intervention studies. In S.S. Coughlin & T.L. Beauchamp (Eds,), Ethics and Epidemiology (pp. 156–177). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gray, J.N. (1989). Pediatric AIDS research: Legal, ethical, and policy influences. In J.M. Siebert & R.A. Olson (Eds.), Children, Adolescents, and AIDS (pp. 179–227). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  27. Grodin, M.A. (1992). Historical origins of the Nuremberg Code. In G.J. Annas & M.A. Grodin (Eds.), The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation (pp. 121–144). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grodin, M.A., & Alpert, J.J. (1988). Children as participants in medical research. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 35, 1389–1401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Grodin, M.A., Kaminow, P.V., & Sassower, R. (1986). Ethical issues in AIDS research. Quality Review Bulletin, 12, 347–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamill, S.M., Carpenter, H.C., & Cope, T.A. (1908). A comparison of the von Pirquet, Calmette and Moro tuberculin tests and their diagnostic value. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2, 405–447.Google Scholar
  31. Hammerschmidt, D.E., & Keane, M.A. (1992). Institutional review board (IRB) review lacks impact on the readability of consent forms for research. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 304, 348–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. High, D.M. (1992). Research with Alzheimer’s subjects: Informed consent and proxy decision making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 950–957.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Koska, M.T. (1992, January 5). Outcomes research: Hospitals face confidentiality concerns. Hospitals, 32–34.Google Scholar
  34. Lane, S.D. (1994). Research bioethics in Egypt. In R. Gillon (Ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics (pp. 885–894). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Lara, M.D.C., & de la Fuente, J.R. (1990). On informed consent. Bulletin of Pan-American Health Organization, 24, 419–424.Google Scholar
  36. Lavelle-Jones, C., Byrne, D.J., Rice, P., & Cuschieri, A. (1993). Factors affecting quality of informed consent. British Medical Journal, 306, 885–890.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lederer, S.E. (1997). Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America Before the Second World War. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Leiken, S. (1993). Minors’ assent, consent, or dissent to medical research. IRB, 15, 1–7.Google Scholar
  39. Leiken, S.L. (1989). Immunodeficiency virus infection, adolescents, and the institutional review board. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 10, 500–505.Google Scholar
  40. Levine, C. (1991). Children in HIV/AIDS clinical trials: Still vulnerable after all these years. Law, Medicine & Health Care, 19, 231–237.Google Scholar
  41. Levine, R.J. (1991). Informed consent: Some challenges to the universality of the western model. Law, Medicine, & Health Care, 19, 207–213.Google Scholar
  42. Lo, B. (1990). Assessing decision-making capacity. Law, Medicine, & Health Care, 18, 193–201.Google Scholar
  43. Loue, S. (1995). Legal and Ethical Aspects of HIV-Related Research. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  44. Loue, S., Okello, D., & Kawuma, M. (1996). Research bioethics in the Ugandan context: A program summary. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 24, 47–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. LoVerde, M.E., Prochazka, A.V., & Bynny, R.L. (1989). Research consent forms: Continued unreadability and increasing length. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4, 410–412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Macklin, R. (1989). The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects. IRB, 11, 1–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mastroianni, A.C., Faden, F., & Federman, D. (Eds.). (1994). Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  48. Meade, C.D., & Howser, D.M. (1992). Consent forms: How to determine and improve their readability. Oncology Nursing Forum, 19, 1523–1528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mendelson, J.H. (1991). Protection of participants and experimental design in clinical abuse liability testing. British Medical Journal, 86, 1543–1548.Google Scholar
  50. Morrow, G., Gootnick, J., & Schmale, A. (1978). A simple technique for increasing cancer patients’ knowledge of informed consent to treatment. Cancer, 42, 793–799.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Osler, W. (1907). The evolution of the idea of experiment in medicine. Transactions of the Congress of American Physicians and Surgeons, 7, 7–8.Google Scholar
  52. Perley, S., Fluss, S.S., Bankowski, Z., & Simon, F. (1992). The Nuremberg Code: An International Overview. In G.J. Annas & M. A. Grodin (Eds.), The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation (pp. 149–173). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Peterson, B.T., Clancy, S.J., Champion, K., & McLarty, J.W. (1992). Improving readability of consent forms: What the computers may not tell you. IRB, 14(6), 6–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Reiser, S.J., & Knudson, P. (1993). Protecting research subjects after consent: The case for “research intermediary.” IRB, 15, 10–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosenthal, R., & Blanck, P.D. (1993). Science and ethics in conducting, analyzing, and reporting social science research: Implications for social scientists, judges, and lawyers. Indian Law Journal, 68, 1209–1228.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1984). Applying Hamlet’s question to the ethical conduct of research: A conceptual addendum. American Psychologist, 39, 561–563.Google Scholar
  57. Rosnow, R.L., Rotheram-Borus, S.J., Blanck, P.D., & Koocher, G.P. (1993). The institutional review board as a mirror of scientific and ethical standards. American Psychologist, 48, 821–826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Siegel, H.A., Carlson, R.G., Falck, R., Reece, R.D., & Perlin, T. (1993). Conducting HIV outreach and research among incarcerated drug abusers: A case study of ethical concerns and dilemmas. Journal of Substance Abuse and Treatment, 10, 71–75.Google Scholar
  59. Silva, M.C., & Sorrell, J.M. (1988). Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: A review of empirical research. IRB, 10, 1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Simel, D.L., & Feussner, J.R. (1992). Suspended judgment: Clinical trials of informed consent. Controlled Clinical Trials, 13, 321–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Susman, E.J., Dorn, L.D., & Fletcher, J.C. (1992). Participation in biomedical research: The consent process as viewed by children, adolescents, young adults, and physicians. Journal of Pediatrics, 121, 547–552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Tankanow, R.M., Sweet, B.V., & Weisikoff, J.A. (1992). Patients’ perceived understanding of informed consent in investigational drug studies. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 49, 633–635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Taub, H.A. (1986). Comprehension of informed consent for research: Issues and directions for future study. IRB, 8, 7–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Thong, Y.H., & Harm, S.C. (1991). The social filter effect of informed consent in clinical research. Pediatrics, 87, 568–569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Torres, C.G., Turner, M.E., Harkess, J.R., & Istre, G.R. (1991). Security measures for AIDS and HIV. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 210–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Weithorn, L.A., & McCabe, M.A. (1988). Emerging ethical and legal issues in pediatric psychology. In D. Routh (Ed.), Handbook of Pediatric Psychology (pp. 567–606). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  67. Weithorn, L.A., & Scherer, D.G. (1994). Children’s involvement in research participation decisions: Psychological considerations. In M.A. Grodin & L.H. Glantz (Eds.), Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics, and Law (pp. 133–179). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. World Health Organization. (1995). Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice for Trials on Pharmaceutical Products. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  69. World Medical Association. (1991a). Declaration of Helsinki. Law, Medicine & Health Care, 19, 264–265.Google Scholar
  70. World Medical Association. (1991b). The Nuremberg Code. Law, Medicine & Health Care, 19, 266.Google Scholar
  71. Young, D.R., Hooker, D.T., & Freeberg, F.E. (1990). Informed consent documents: Increasing comprehension by reducing reading level. IRB, 12(3), 1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Personalised recommendations