Skip to main content

Modularized Interoperability in Supply-Chains: A Co-adoption study of RosettaNet’s XML-based Interorganizational Systems

  • Chapter
E-Business Management

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 1))

  • 1393 Accesses

Abstract

The factors that influence an organization’s decision to begin using a certain type of technology have come under much study. Several theoretical models, commonly referred to as technology diffusion models, have been developed to better understand the role of these factors in the adoption, diffusion and infusion of certain types of technology. The benefits of this line of research are pervasive and the opportunities are clear. Managers gain insight as to why a technological innovation may diffuse quickly, or may stagnate. Researchers gain insight into factors causing greater assimilation depths or wider adoption breadths. Managers may find the opportunity to influence or predict these factors. Researchers may detect common influential factors across several technology types and generalize their models to a broader scope. This paper introduces an innovation diffusion model regarding a recent technological innovation known as XML-based interorganizational systems. A theoretical framework is proposed to assess the influential factors leading toward adoption and internal diffusion of the target technology. The factors under study include compatibility, relative advantage, environment and three control variables (seller versus buyer, technology conversion type, and location in supply chain). A case study utilizing RosettaNet’s Partner Interface Process is presented, the results are compared to the theoretical model, and the findings stated. Overall the findings indicate substantial improvements in all financial and operational measures (ROI, transaction cost, payback, cycle time and through-put). Further, significant indirect benefits include: information ubiquity. improved employee morale, improved time allocation towards value-added activities, and significant product cost savings on the part of the buyer organization. Overall, environmental factors and the lack of compatibility with the old processes jointly resulted in the organizations’ adoption of RosettaNet-based solutions. The relative advantage construct was determined to be the key factor that would sustain interest in the target technology likely leading towards greater internal diffusion. The paper concludes with several managerial implications and recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. “Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?”, Decision Sciences (30:2), Spring 1999, pp. 361–391.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. “The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of information Technologies” Decision Sciences (28:3), Summer 1997, pp. 557–582.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong, C. and Sambamurthy, V., “Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures”, Information Systems Research, December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Attewell, P. “Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing” Organization Science (3:1), February 1992, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baru, A. and Lee, B. “An Economic Analysis of the Introduction of an Electronic Data Interchange System”, Information Systems Research (8:4), December 1997, pp. 398–421.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berinato, S. “Will XML be the ultimate platform? Or will it be the next EDI?” CIO Magazine, May 15, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, I. and Kim, Y. “Critical Factors for Assimilation of Object-Orientated Programming Languages”, Journal of Management Information Systems (18:3), Winter 2001–2002, pp. 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Choudhury, V. “Strategic Choices in the Development of Interorganizational Information Systems”, Information Systems Research (8:1), March 1997, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. demons, E. and Kleindorfer, P. “An Economic Analysis of Interorganizational Information Technology” Decision Support Systems (8), 1992, pp. 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper, R. and Zmud, R. “Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach”, Management Science (36:2), February 1990, pp. 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, F., Bagozzi, P. and Warshaw, P., “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, August 1989, pp. 982–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fichman, Robert G. “The Role of Aggregation in the Measurement of IT-Related Organizational Innovation”, MIS Quarterly (25:4), December 2001, pp. 427–455.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fichman, Robert G. “Information Technology Diffusion: A Review of Empirical Research”, Proc. Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, 1992, Dallas, TX, pp. 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fichman, R. and Kemerer, C. “The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps”, Information Systems Research (10:3), September 1999, pp. 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fishbein, M. and Ajzein, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gebauer, J. and Buxmann, P., “Assessing the Value of Interoganizational Systems to Support Business Transactions” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hart, P. and Saunders, C. “Emerging Electronic Partnerships: Antecedents and Dimensions of EDI Use from the Supplier’s Perspective” Journal of Management Information Systems (14:4), Spring 1998, pp. 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  18. lacovou, C., Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. “EDI and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology”, MIS Quarterly, December 1995, pp. 465–485.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson, C., Chow, S. and Leitch, R. (1997). “Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System” Decision Sciences (28:7), Spring 1997, pp. 357–388.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, J. “Ballmer: It’s the tags, stupid”, InfoWorld, April 28, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karahanna, E., Straub, D., and Chervany, N. “Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs” MIS Quarterly, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lucas, H. and Spitler, V. “Technology Use and Performance: A Field Study of Broker Workstations” Decision Sciences (30:2), Spring 1999, pp. 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rai, A. and Deepinder, S. “An Empirical Investigation into Factors Relating to the Adoption of Executive Information Systems: An Analysis of EIS for Collaboration and Decision Support” Decision Sciences, Fall 1997

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ravichandran, T. “Swiftness and Intensity of Administrative Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study of TQM in Information Systems”, Decision Sciences (31:3), Summer 2000, pp. 691–724.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Segev, A., Gebauer, J., and Beam, C. “Procurement in the Internet Age-Current Practices and Emerging Trends”, CMIT Working Paper WP-98-1033, August 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw, M., Blanning, R., Strader, T., and Whinston, A. Handbook on Electronic Commerce, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sliwa, C. and King, J. “B-To-B Hard to Sell with XML”, Computerworld, February 28, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thong, James Y, Model. “An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Business”, Journal of Management Information Systems (15:4), Spring, 1999, pp. 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test”, Decision Sciences (27:3), Summer 1996, pp. 451–481.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Flynn, Peter (2002) editor for The XML FAQ Special Interest Group, v.2.1, 2002 http://www.ucc.ie/xml/#index is the web-site for

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Michael J. Shaw

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, M., Shoonmaker, M., Shaw, M., Shen, S., Quails, W., Wang, R. (2002). Modularized Interoperability in Supply-Chains: A Co-adoption study of RosettaNet’s XML-based Interorganizational Systems. In: Shaw, M.J. (eds) E-Business Management. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47548-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47548-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7178-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47548-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics