Skip to main content

Cooperative Control for Autonomous Air Vehicles

  • Chapter
Cooperative Control and Optimization

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 66))

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to develop and evaluate the performance of strategies for cooperative control of autonomous air vehicles that seek to gather information about a dynamic target environment, evade threats, and coordinate strikes against targets. The air vehicles are equipped with sensors to view a limited region of the environment they are visiting, and are able to communicate with one another to enable cooperation. They are assumed to have some “physical” limitations including possibly maneuverability limitations, fuel/time constraints and sensor range and accuracy. The developed cooperative search framework is based on two inter-dependent tasks: (i) on-line learning of the environment and storing of the information in the form of a “target search map”; and (ii) utilization of the target search map and other information to compute on-line a guidance trajectory for the vehicle to follow. We study the stability of vehicular swarms to try to understand what types of communications are needed to achieve cooperative search and engagement, and characteristics that affect swarm aggregation and disintegration. Finally, we explore the utility of using-biomimicry of social foraging strategies to develop coordination strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ablavsky, V. and Snorrason, M. (2000). Optimal search for a moving target: a geometric approach. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benkoski, S., Monticino, M., and Weisinger, J. (1991). A survery of the search theory literature. Naval Research Logistics, 38:469–494.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., and Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford Univ. Press, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron, S. (1994). Obstacle avoidance and path planning. Industrial Robot, 21:9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choset, H. and Pignon, P. (1997). Coverage path planning: the boustrophedon cellular decomposition. In International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conn, A., Schcinberg, K., and Toint, P. (1997). Recent progress in unconstrainted nonlinear optimization without derivatives. Mathematical Programming, 79:397–414.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Danskin, J. (1968). A helicopter versus submarines search game. Operations Research, 16:509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dell, R. and Eagle, J. (1996). Using multiple searchers in constrainted-path moving-targer search problems. Naval Research Logistics, 43:463–480.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis, J. and Torczon, V. (1991). Direct search methods on parallel machines. SIAM Journal Optimization, 1:448–474.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Eagle, J. and Yee, J. (1990). An optimal branch-and-bound procedure for the constrained path moving target search problem. Operations Research, 38:11–114.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gillen, D. and Jacques, D. (2000). Cooperative behavior schemes for improving the effectiveness of autonomous wide area search munitions. In Proceedings of Workshop on Cooperative Control and Optimization, University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldsmith, S. and Robinett, R. (1998). Collective search by mobile robots using alpha-beta coordination. In Drogoul, A., Tambe, M., and Fukuda, T., editors, Collective Robotics, pages 136–146. Springer Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hert, S., Tiwari, S., and Lumelsky, V. (1996). A terrain-covering algorithm for auv. Autonomous Robots, 3:91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hohzaki, R. and Iida, K. (1995a). An optimal search plan for a moving target when a search path is given. Mathematica Japonica, 41:175–184.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hohzaki, R. and Iida, K. (1995b). Path constrained search problem with reward criterion. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 38:254–264.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hohzaki, R. and Iida, K. (2000). A search game when a search path is given. European Journal of Operational Reasearch, 124:114–124.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacques, D. and Leblanc, R. (1998). Effectiveness analysis for wide area search munitions. In Proceedings of the AIAA Missile Sciences Conference, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khatib, O. (1985). Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 500–505, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koopman, B. (1980). Search and Screening: General principles with Historical Application Pergarnon, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lucidi, S. and Sciandrone, M. (1997). On the global convergence of derivative free methods for unconstrained optimization. In Technical Report. Univ.di Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Madigan, M., Martinko, J., and Parker, J. (1997). Biology of Microorganisms. Prentice Hall, NJ, 8 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nelder, J. and Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7:308–313.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Passino, K. and Burgess, K. (1998). Stability Analysis of Discrete Event Systems. John Wiley and Sons Pub., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Passino, K. M. (2001). Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richardson, H. (1987). Search theory. In Center for Naval Analyses. NOO-014-83-C-0725.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Snorrason, M. and Norris, J. (1999). Vision based obstacle detection and path planetary rovers. In Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology II, Orlanso, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spires, S. and Goldsmith, S. (1998). Exhaustive geographic search with mobile robots along space-filling curves. In Drogoul, A., Tambe, M., and Fukuda, T., editors, Collective Robotics, pages 1–12. Springer Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stephens, D. and Krebs, J. (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stewart, T. (1980). Experience with a branch-and-bound algorithm for constrained searcher motion. In Haley, K. and Stone, L., editors, Search Theory and Applications, pages 247–253. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stone, L. (1975). Theory of Optimal Search. Acadamic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Stone, L. (1983). The process of search planning: Current approachs and the continuing problems. Operational Research, 31:207–233.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Torczon, V. (1991). On the convergence of the multidirectional search algorithm. SIAM Journal Optimization, 1:123–145.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Torczon, V. (1997). On the convergence of pattern search algorithms. SIAM Journal Optimization, 7:1–25.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsitsiklis, J. and Bertsekas, D. (1989). Parallel and Distributed Computation. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Engelwood Cliffs, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Washburn, A. (1980). Search-evasion game in a fixed region. Operations Research, 28:1290–1298.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Weaver, S., Baird, L., and Polycarpou, M. (1998). An analytical framework for local feedforward networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 9(3):473–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Passino, K. et al. (2002). Cooperative Control for Autonomous Air Vehicles. In: Murphey, R., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Cooperative Control and Optimization. Applied Optimization, vol 66. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47536-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47536-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0549-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47536-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics