Skip to main content

Distributive Justice

Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications

  • Chapter
Handbook of Justice Research in Law

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaron, H. J., and Schwartz, W. B. (1984). The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S., and Ruderman, M. (1987). The Role of Procedural Justice in Organizational Behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, S. T., McQueen, L. R., and Schaerfl, L. M. (1992). Social Decision-making Processes and the Equal Partitionment of Shared Resources. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, D. (1987). Distributive Justice and Satisfaction with Material Well-Being. American Sociological Review, 52, 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, O. W. (1972). Health Care: Can There Be Equity? New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asdigian, N. L., Cohn, E. S., and Blum, M. H. (1994). Gender Differences in Distributive Justice: The Role of Self-presentation Revisited. Sex Roles, 30, 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and Fairness: Effects of Type of Relationship and Task Performance on Choice of Distribution Rules. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 402–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., and Walster, E. (1974). Reactions to Confirmation and Disconfirmation of Inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1989). Theories of Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1995). Justice as Impartiality: A Treatise on Social Justice, Volume II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. H., and McQuinn, R. D. (1986). Attraction and Exchange in Continuing and Noncontinuing Dating Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 942–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., Anderson, B., and Cohen, B. P. (1972). Structural Aspects of Distributive Justice: A Status Value Formation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, and B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress (pp. 119–146). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., and Wortman, C. B. (1991). Sharing of Home Responsibilities between Professionally Employed Women and their Husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 844–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., and Schwartz, P. (1983). American Couples. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, P., and Light, J. (1978). Laboratory Experimentation in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, R. D., and Thomas, S. L. (1992). Perceived Equity, Motivation, and Final Offer Arbitration in Major League. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 280–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. (1985). The Relation of Trait Self-esteem and Positive Inequity to Productivity. Journal of Personality, 53, 517–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., O’Malley, M. N., Hite, T., and Davies, D. K. (1987). Reward Allocation and Self-esteem: The Roles of Modeling and Equity Restoration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 844–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., Tyler, T. R., and Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992). The Influence of Prior Commitment to an Institution on Reactions to Perceived Unfairness: The Higher They Are, the Harder They Fall. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., and VanYperen, N. W. (1991). Referential Comparisons, Relational Comparisons, and Exchange Orientation: Their Relation to Marital Satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 709–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., VanYperen, N. W., Taylor, S. E., and Collins, R. L. (1991). Social Comparison and the Drive Upward Revisited: Affiliation as a Response to Marital Stress. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D., and Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, R., Lloyd, S. A., Henton, J. M., and Larson, J. H. (1982). Fairness and Reward Level as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., and Chrisman, K. (1994). Resource Allocation in Intimate Relationships: Trying to Make Sense of a Confusing Literature. In M. J. Lerner and G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond (pp. 65–88). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1982). Perceiving Justice: An Attributional Perspective. In J. Greenberg and R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior (pp. 119–160). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, D. E., and Fasolo, P. M. (1990). Influence of Speed of Third-Party Intervention and Outcome on Negotiator and Constituent Fairness Judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 833–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., and Donnelly, S. (1996). Intergenerational Relations, Inequality, and Social Justice. In L. Montada and M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current Societal Concerns about Justice (pp. 67–84). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., and Hegtvedt, K. A. (1983). Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., and Yamagashi, T. (1983). Social Determinants of Equity Judgements: The Problem of Multidimensional Input. In D. M. Messick and K. S. Cook (Eds.), Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives (pp. 95–126). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., Hegtvedt, K. A., and Yamagashi, T. (1988). Structural Inequality, Legitimation, and Reactions to Inequity in Exchange Networks. In M. Webster, Jr., and M. Foschi (Eds.), Status Generalization: New Theory and Research (pp. 291–308). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F. A. (1992). Tax Evasion and Inequity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowherd, D. M., and Levine, D. I. (1992). Product Quality and Pay Equity Between Lower Level Employees and Top Management: An Investigation of Distributive Justice Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 92, 302–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., and Folger, R. (1989). Referent Cognitions and Task Decision Autonomy: Beyond Equity Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancer, L. S., and Gilbert, L. A. (1993). Spouses’ Family Work Participation and Its Relation to Wives’ Occupational Level. Sex Roles, 28, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, B. (1984). A Test of Equity Theory for Marital Adjustment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R., and Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: Cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Fave, R. (1980). The Meek Shall Not Inherit the Earth. American Sociological Review, 45, 955–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, S., and Lerner, M. J. (1989). A New Look at Equity and Outcomes as Determinants of Satisfaction in Close Personal Relationships. Social Justice Research, 3, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, S., and Lerner, M. J. (1994). Entitlements in Close Relationships: A Justice-Motive Analysis. In M. J. Lerner and G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond (pp. 43–63). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, G. C., and Meeker, B. F. (1984). Modifiers of the Equity Effect: Group Outcome and Causes for Individual Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 586–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1992). Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1994). Human Values and Their Relation to Justice. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. D., Barbaresi, W., and Caiola, V. (1983). Physical Stigma as a Variable in Perceptions of Equity. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 13, 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., and Bassin, E. (1990). The Dissolution of Intimate Relationships: A Hazard Model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking Equity Theory: A Referent Cognition Model. In H. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, and J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in Social Relations (pp. 145–163). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., and Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., and Martin, C. (1986). Relative Deprivation and Referent Cognitions: Distributive and Procedural Justice Effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G. E., and Gordon, M. E. (1989). Workplace Justice and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Satisfaction with Union and Management. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 851–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. G., Ingman, S. R., and Campbell, J. (1991). Health Care Provision and Distributive Justice: End Stage Renal Disease and the Elderly in Britain and America. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 565–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J., and Fujimoto, T. (1994). Housework, Paid Work, and Depression among Husbands and Wives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. E., and Bowlby, R. L. (1988). Propositions about Grievance Settlements: Finally, Consultation with Grievants. Personnel Psychology, 41, 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. E., and Fryxell, G. E. (1989). Voluntariness of Association as a Moderator of the Importance of Procedural and Distributive Justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 993–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Little, B., and Teddlie, C. B. (1978). Racial Differences in Children’s Responses to Inequity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1986). Differential Intolerance for Inequity from Organizational and Individual Agents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1988). Equity and Workplace Status: A Field Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 606–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1989). Cognitive Reevaluation of Outcomes in Response to Underpayment Inequity. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 174–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990a). Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990b). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the Name of Justice: Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment Inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: Effects on Marital Quality. Social Forces, 74, 1029–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, W. I. (1989). The Allocation of Negative Outcomes. Advances in Group Processes, 6, 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, W. I., and Sell, J. (1988). The Effects of Competition on Allocators’ Preferences for Contributive and Retributive Justice Rules. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haayry, M., and Haayry, H. (1990). Health Care as a Right, Fairness and Medical Resources. Bioethics, 4, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammock, G. S., Rosen, S., Richardson, D. R., and Bernstein, S. (1989). Aggression as Equity Restoration. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder, J. W. (1991). Equity Theory Versus Expectancy Theory: The Case of Major League Baseball Free Agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 458–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J., and Joyce, M. A. (1980). What’s Fair? It Depends on How You Phrase the Question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassebrauck, M. (1986). Ratings of Distress as a Function of Degree and Kind of Inequity. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 269–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassebrauck, M. (1987). The Influence of Misattributions on Reactions to Inequity: Towards a Further Understanding of Inequity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Utne, M. K., and Traupmann, J. (1979). Equity Theory and Intimate Relationships. In R. L. Burgess and T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social Exchange in Developing Relationships (pp. 99–133). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headley, B. (1991). Distributive Justice and Occupational Incomes: Perceptions of Justice Determine Perceptions of Fact. British Journal of Sociology, 42, 581–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A. (1987). When Rewards Are Scarce: Equal or Equitable Distributions? Social Forces, 66, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A. (1990). The Effects of Relationship Structure on Emotional Responses to Inequity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 214–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A., and Cook, K. S. (1987). The Role of Justice in Conflict Situations. In E. J. Lawler and B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 4, pp. 109–136). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegtvedt, K. A., Thompson, K. A., and Cook, K. S. (1993). Power and Equity: What Counts in Attributions for Exchange Outcomes? Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 100–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. G. (1982). Development of Equity and Altruism in Judgement of Reward and Damage Allocation. Developmental Psychology, 18, 825–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. G., and Cook, T. D. (1979). Equity Theory and the Cognitive Ability of Children. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. M., and Kernan, J. B. (1991). Consumer Reaction to Inequitable Exchange: The Role of Causal Inferences. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 685–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., and Miles, E. W. (1987). A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A. (1987). Gender and Distributive Justice: The Influence of Gender-Related Characteristics on Allocations. Sex Roles, 17, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A. (1989). Relative Deprivation and the Gender Wage Gap. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1980). A New Theory of Distributive Justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1983). Fairness of Individual Rewards and Fairness of the Reward Distribution: Specifying the Inconsistency between Micro and Macro Principles of Justice. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1990). Methods for the Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Comparison Processes. Sociological Methodology, 20, 369–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1993). Building the Theory of Comparison Processes: Construction of Postulates and Derivation of Predictions. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theories (pp. 212–264). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G., and Wegener, B. (1997). Methods for Empirical Justice Analysis: Part 1. Framework, Models, and Quantities. Social Justice Research, 4, 393–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jecker, N. S., and Berg, A. O. (1992). Allocating Medical Resources in Rural America: Alternative Perceptions of Justice. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A., Nelson, R. E., and Gaeddert, W. P. (1980). Sex of Subject and Sex Composition of the Group as Determinants of Reward Allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karambayya, R., and Brett, J. M. (1989). Managers Handling Disputes: Third Party Roles and Perceptions of Fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 687–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser, E., and Lamm, H. (1980). Input Integration and Input Weighting on Allocations of Gains and Losses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser, E., and Lamm, H. (1981). Causal Explanation of Performance Differences and Allocations Among Friends. Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, L. (1986). Rules, Reciprocity, and Rewards: A Developmental Study of Resource Allocation in Social Interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. I., Park, H.-J., and Suzuki, N. (1990). Reward Allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: A Comparison of Individualistic and Collectivistic Cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 188–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W. C., Miles, E. W., and Day, D. D. (1993). A Test and Refinement of the Equity Sensitivity Construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, K. A., Grasmick, H. G., and Smith, K. W. (1991). Framing Justice: Taxpayer Evaluations of Personal Tax Burdens. Law and Society Review, 25, 845–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J. R., and Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about Inequality. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., and Wegener, B. (Eds.). (1995). Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhse, H., and Singer, P. (1988). Age and the Allocation of Medical Resources. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 13, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. K., and Cummings, M. L. (1994). Role of Self-esteem in Resolving Inequity. Psychological Reports, 75, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., and Schwinger, T. (1980). Norms Concerning Distributive Justice: Are Needs Taken into Consideration in Allocation Decisions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., and Schwinger, T. (1983). Need Consideration in Allocation Decisions: Is It Just? Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., Kayser, E., and Schanz, V. (1983). An Attributional Analysis of Interpersonal Justice: Ability and Effort as Inputs of the Allocation of Gain and Loss. Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., and Ford, R. (1995). Bargaining. In K. Cook, G. Fine, and J. House (Eds.), Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology (pp. 236–256). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., and Thompson, M. E. (1978). Impact of Leader Responsibility for Inequity on Subordinate Revolts. Social Psychology, 41, 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M. C., and Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework: The Importance of Options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1975). The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1981). The Justice Motive in Human Relations: Some Thoughts on What We Know and Need to Know about Justice. In J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior (pp. 11–35). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., and Bond, M. H. (1984). The Impact of Cultural Collectivism on Reward Allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., and Park, H. J. (1986). Effects of Interactional Goal on Choice of Allocation Rule: A Cross-National Study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in Social Relation. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, and R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology (pp. 211–39). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., Jr., and Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction (pp. 167–208). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lujansky, H., and Mikula, G. (1983). Can Equity Theory Explain the Quality and Stability of Romantic Relationships? Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., and Adams, J. B. (1983). Role of Gender Interpersonal Orientation and Self Presentation in Distributive Justice Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 598–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., and Adams, J. B. (1984). Situational Moderators of Gender Differences in Reward Allocation. Sex Roles, 11, 869–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., and Deaux, K. (1982). Individual Differences in Justice Behavior. In J. Greenberg and R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior (pp. 43–76). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Bylsma, W. H., and Cozzarelli, C. (1989). Gender Differences in Distributive Justice Preferences: The Impact of Domain. Sex Roles, 21, 487–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, G. (1985). The Preference of Equity When Judging the Attractiveness and Fairness of an Allocator: The Role of the Familiarity and Culture. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a Multilevel Distributive Justice Theory. American Sociological Review, 50, 822–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B. (1988). Injustice and Arousal. Social Justice Research, 2, 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W., and Sell, J. (1986). Rejection of Authority: The Importance of Type of Distribution Rule and Extent of Benefit. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 855–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGullicuddy-DeLisi, A. V., Watlang, C., and Vincher, A. J. (1994). The Effect of Relationship on Children’s Distributive Justice Reasoning. Child Development, 65, 1694–1700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, D. (Ed.). (1989). Painful Choices: Research and Essays on Health Care. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, B. F., and Elliott, G. C. (1987). Counting the Costs: Equity and the Allocation of Negative Group Products. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, B. F., and Leik, R. K. (1995). Experimentation in Sociological Social Psychology. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, and J. s. House (Eds.), Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology (pp. 630–649). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J. R. (1989). Managing to Be Fair: An Exploration of Values, Motives, and Leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 252–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messé, L. A., Hymes, R. W., and MacCoun, R. J. (1986). Group Categorization and Distributive Justice Decisions. In H. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, and J. Greenberg (Eds.), Social Theory and Social Structure (pp. 227–248). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a Decision Heuristic. In B. A. Mellers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications (pp. 11–31). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., and Allison, S. T. (1987). Accepting Unfairness: Outcomes and Attributions. Special Issue: Procedural Justice. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and Preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J., Edwards, J. N., and Acock, A. C. (1984). Satisfaction in Intimate Relationships as a Function of Inequality, Inequity, and Outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G., and Lerner, M. J. (1994). Justice in Close Relationships: An Introduction. In M. J. Lerner and G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond (pp. 1–9). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, E. W., Hatfield, J. D., and Huseman, R. C. (1989). The Equity Sensitivity Construct: Potential Implications for Worker Performance. Journal of Management, 15, 581–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., and Ordóñez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of Social Justice: Compromises Between Equality and Efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 629–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. F., Hembree, S. E., and Enright, R. D. (1993). The Unfolding of Justice: A Developmental Perspective on Reward Allocation. In B. A. Mellers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications (pp. 183–204). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. (1987). Equity Theory Predictions of Behavior in Organizations. In R. M. Steers and L. W. Porter Motivation and Work Behavior (pp. 89–110). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni, D. V., Lundgren, D., and Burlew, A. K. (1991). Gender Differences in Self-Depriving Behavior as a Reaction to Extreme Inequity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. H. (1984). Intergroup Allocation Bias Before and After Group Discussion. Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. H. (1986). Equity, Intergroup Bias, and Interpersonal Bias in Reward Allocation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordóñez, L., and Mellers, B. (1993). Trade-offs in Fairness and Preference Judgments. In B. A. Mellers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications (pp. 138–154). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orne, M. (1962). On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, S. L., and Jackson, J. J. (1991). Further Examination of the Equity Sensitivity Construct. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 1091–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, J. (1993). What Does Equity in Health Mean? Journal of Social Policy, 22, 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. C. (1990). Husbands’ and Wives’ Perceptions of Marital Fairness across the Family Life Cycle. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31, 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platow, M. J., McClintock, C. G., and Liebrand, W. B. (1990). Predicting Intergroup Fairness and Ingroup Bias in the Minimal Group Paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., and Crosby, F. (1987). The Importance of Context for Assessing Deserving. In J. C. Masters and W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation (pp. 165–182). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, K. S., Buunk, B. P., and VanYperen, N. W. (1993). Equity, Normative Disapproval and Extramarital Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, C. S., and Mueller, C. W. (1995). Extensions of Justice Theory: Justice Evaluations and Employees’ Reactions in a Natural Setting. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 178–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T. (1981). Self Presentation and Distributive Justice. In J. J. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Theory (pp. 269–291). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T. (1986). Levels of Interest in the Study of Interpersonal Justice. Justice in Social Relations. 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., and Burns, L. B. (1982). The Salience of the Self in Responses to Inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 464–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., and Jackson, L. A. (1981). Sex Differences in Reward Allocation: Subjects, Partners, and Tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 465–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., and Spitze, G. (1992). Whistle While You Work: The Effect of Household Task Performance on Women’s and Men’s Well-being. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 844–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C. E., Lowery, D., Hubbard, M. L., Maravankin, O. J., and Neises, M. (1988). The Impact of Employee Mobility and Employee Performance on the Allocation of Rewards Under Conditions of Constraint. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 605–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, K., Pondel, M., and Wittig, M. A. (1981). The Effect of Anticipated Future Interaction on Reward Allocation in Same and Opposite Sex Dyads. Journal of Personality, 49, 438–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, C. D., and Allison, S. T. (1994). Cognitive Factors Affecting the Use of Social Decision Heuristics in Resource-Sharing Tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. B. (1988). Equity/Inequity and Self-esteem: A Reassessment. Psychological Reports, 63, 637–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. B., and Keith, P. M. (1981). Equity in Marital Roles across the Family Life Cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinger, T. (1980). Just Allocation of Goods: Decisions Among Three Principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction (pp. 95–125). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinger, T., and Lamm, H. (1981). Justice Norms and Allocation Decisions: Need Consideration as a Function of Resource Adequacy for Complete Need Satisfaction, Recipients’ Contributions, and Recipients’ Interpersonal Attraction. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley, C. F. (1991). Giving a Reason for Unfairness: Effects of Rationale on Australian Students’ Performances Within an Implicit Reward Situation. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheplak, N. (1987). The Role of Self-explanations and Self-evaluations in Legitimating Inequality. American Sociological Review, 52, 495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. H., and Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward General Principles of Managerial Fairness. Social Justice Research, 1, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, C. K., and Waitzman, K. A. (1991). The Development of Distributive Justice Orientations: Contextual Influences on Children’s Resource Allocations. Child Development, 62, 1367–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. J., and Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating Scarce Resources: A Contingency Model of Distributive Justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., and Krantz, M. (1981). The Effect of Recipients’ Relative Age and Productivity on Children’s Reward Allocation. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 139, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1986). The Relationship between Inequity and Emotions in Close Relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment Model, Equity, and Social Support Determinants of Relationship Commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1992). How Men and Women Expect to Feel and Behave in Response to Inequity in Close Relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., and Schwartz, P. (1994). Equity and Balance in the Exchange of Contributions in Close Relationships. In M. J. Lerner and G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond (pp. 11–41). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E. (1983). Factors in Reward Distribution: Allocator Motive, Gender, and Protestant Ethic Endorsement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 410–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E. (1985). Exploring the Basis of Sex Differences in Third-Party Allocations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1621–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepina, L. P., and Perrewe, P. L. (1987). The Impact of Inequity on Task Satisfaction Internal Motivation, and Perceptions of Job Characteristics. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolte, J. F. (1983). The Legitimation of Structural Inequality: Reformulation and Test of the Self-Evaluation Argument. American Sociological Review, 48, 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, P. D. (1990). Distributive Justice and Pay Satisfaction: A Field Test of an Equity Theory Prediction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takenishi, M. (1988). Unfair Allocation in a Competitive Setting: A Self-Presentational Perspective. Japanese Psychological Research, 30, 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E., and Mitchell, G. (1993). Liberal and Conservative Approaches to Justice: Conflicting Psychological Portraits. In A. Mellers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications (pp. 234–255). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., and Walker, W. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (1991). Family Work: Women’s Sense of Fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 2, 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, S. R., and Davis, J. H. (1985). Individual and Group Reward Allocation Decisions in Two Situational Contexts: Effects of Relative Need and Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1148–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Töornblom, K. Y. (1977). Distributive Justice: Typology and Propositions. Human Relations, 31, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Töornblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and Negative Allocations: A Typology and Model of Conflicting Justice Principles. In E. J. Lawler and B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 5, pp. 141–168). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tömblom, K. Y., and Jonsson, D. R. (1985). Subrules of the Equality and Contributions Principles: Their Perceived Fairness in Contribution and Retribution. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towson, S. M., Lerner, M. J., and DeCarufel, A. (1981). Justice Rules of Ingroup Loyalties: The Effects of Competition on Children’s Allocation Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 697–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traupmann, J., and Hatfield, E. (1983). How Important is Marital Fairness over the Lifespan? International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 17, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traupmann, J., Hatfield, E., and Wexler, P. (1983). Equity and Sexual Satisfaction in Dating Couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., and Dawes, R. M. (1993). Fairness in Groups: Comparing the Self-interest and Social Identity Perspectives. In B. A. Mellers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications (pp. 87–108). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and Griffin. (1991). The Influence of Decision Makers’ Goals on their Concerns about Procedural Justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1629–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and McGraw, K. M. (1986). Ideology and the Interpretation of Personal Experience: Procedural Justice and Political Quiescence. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., and Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne, M. K., and Kidd, R. F. (1980). Equity and Attribution. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction (pp. 63–93). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, E. A. (1993). Differential Interests, Equity, and Good Provision. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanYperen, N. W., and Buunk, B. P. (1991). Sex-Role Attitudes, Social Comparison and Relationship Satisfaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanYperen, N. W., and Buunk, B. P. (1994). Social Comparison and Social Exchange in Marital Relationships. In M. J. Lerner and G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond (pp. 89–115). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. (1984). Models of Psychological Inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 266–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P., and Terborg, J. R. (1987). Salary Increment Allocation and Individual Differences. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 8, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, G. F., Huggins, J. P., and Perfect, T. J. (1993). Equity, Equality, and Need in the Adult Family. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 439–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. A., Rogers, L., and Zelditch, M., Jr. (1988). Legitimacy and Collective Action: A Research Note. Social Forces, 67, 216–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I. (1989). Effects of Sex, Nationality, and Political Beliefs on Allocation Preferences. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978a). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Traupmann, J. (1978b). Equity and Premarital Sex. Journal of Personality, 3, 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Traupmann, J., and Walster, G. W. (1978c). Equity and Extramarital Sexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 7, 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, B. L., Messée, L. A., and Vallacher, R. R. (1982). Toward Understanding Sex Differences in Pay Allocation: Agency, Communion, and Reward Distribution Behavior. Sex Roles, 8, 1175–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. A., Marks, G., and Jones, G. A. (1981). Luck versus Effort Attributions: Effects on Reward Allocations to Self and Other. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M., Jr. (1969). Can You Really Study an Army in the Laboratory? In A. Etzioni (Ed.), Complex Organizations (pp. 528–539). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M., Jr., and Ford, J. B. (1994). Uncertainty, Potential Power, and Nondecisions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinser, O., Starnes, D. M., and Wild, H. D. (1991). The Effect of Need on the Allocation Behavior of Children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 152, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Joseph Sanders V. Lee Hamilton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hegtvedt, K.A., Cook, K.S. (2002). Distributive Justice. In: Sanders, J., Hamilton, V.L. (eds) Handbook of Justice Research in Law. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47379-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47379-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46340-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47379-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics