This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, 2, 267–299.
Adler, P., Hensler, D., and Nelson, C. E. (1983). Simple Justice: How Litigants Fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Arts, W., and van der Veen, R. (1992). Sociological Approaches to Distributive and Procedural Justice. In K. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Cambridge University Press.
Barrett-Howard, E., and Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural Justice as a Criterion in Allocation Decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 296–304.
Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986) Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness. In R. Lewicki, M. Bazerman, and B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations (vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Casper, J., Tyler, T. R., and Fisher, B. (1988). Procedural Justice in Felony Cases. Law and Society Review, 22, 483–507.
Conlon, D. E., Lind, E. A., and Lissak, R. I. (1989). Nonlinear and nonmonotomic effects of outcome on procedural and distributive fairness judgments. University of Illinois, Champaign (unpublished).
Deutsch, M. (1982). Interdependence and Psychological Orientation. In V. J. Derlega and J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and Helping Behavior: Theories and Research (pp. 15–42). New York: Academic Press.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice. New Haven: Yale.
Dockson, R. R. (1993). Justice in the Balance: Report of the Commission on the Future of the California Courts. San Francisco: Supreme Court of California.
Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., and Sarat, A. (1980–81). The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes. Law and Society Review, 15, 631–654.
Fisher, R., and Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes. New York: Penguin.
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of “Voice” and Improvement on Experienced Inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., and Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of “Voice” and Peer Opinions on Responses to Inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253–2261.
Friedland, N., Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1973). Some Determinants of the Violation of Rules. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 103–118.
Hamilton, V. L., and Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday Justice: Responsibility and the Individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Houlden, P. (1980–81). The Impact of Procedural Modifications on Evaluations of Plea Bargaining. Law and Society Review, 15, 267–292.
Huo, Y. J. (1994). Are There Limits to Justice?: Exclusionary Effects on Justice Attitudes. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
Kawashima, T. (1963). Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan. In A. T. von Mehren (Ed.), Law in Japan (pp. 41–72). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kelman, H. C., and Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of Obedience. New Haven: Yale.
Kelman, M. (1987). A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kramer, R., and Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kressel, K. (1985). The Process of Divorce. New York: Basic Books.
Lane, R. E. (1988). Procedural Goods in a Democracy: How One Is Treated vs. What One Gets. Social Justice Research, 2, 177–192.
Lempert, R., and Sanders, J. (1986). An Invitation to Law and Social Science. New York: Longman.
Leung, K., and Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedural Justice and Culture: Effects of Culture, Gender, and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134–1140.
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in Social Relationships. In J. Thibaut, J. Spence, and R. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press. 211–240.
Lind, E. A. (1990). Arbitrating High-Stakes Cases: An Evaluation of Court-Annexed Arbitration in a United States District Court. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Lind, E. A. (1994). Procedural Justice and Culture: Evidence for Ubiquitous Process Concerns. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 15, 24–36.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Lind, E. A., Erickson, B. E., Friedland, N., and Dickenberger, M. (1978). Reactions to Procedural Models for Adjudicative Conflict Situations: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 318–341.
Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., and Welchans, T. D. The Winding Road from Employee to Complainant. Administrative Science Quarterly (in press).
Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., and Thibaut, J. W. (1980). Procedure and Outcome Effects on Reactions to Adjudicated Resolution of Conflicts of Interests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 643–653.
Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., and Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision Control and Process Control Effects on Procedural Fairness Judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 338–350.
Lind, E. A., and Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent Impropriety and Procedural Fairness Judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 19–29.
Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnick, J., and Tyler, T. R. (1989). The Perception of Justice: Tort Litigants’ Views of Trials, Court-Annexed Arbitration, and Judicial Settlement Conferences. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., and Early, C. (1990a). Voice, Control, and Procedural Justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952–959.
Lind, E. A., Kray, L., and Thompson, L. (1998). Primacy Effects in Justice Judgments. Duke Univeristy (unpublished).
Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnick, J., and Tyler, T. R. (1990b). In the Eye of the Beholder. Tort Litigants’ Evaluations of Their Experiences in the Civil Justice System. Law and Society Review, 24, 953–996.
Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., and de Vera Park, M. (1993). Individual and Corporate Dispute Resolution: Using Procedural Fairness as a Decision Heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224–251.
Lind, E. A., Huo, Y., and Tyler, T. R. (1994). ⋯ And Justice for All: Ethnicity, Gender, and Preferences for Dispute Resolution Procedures. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 269–290.
Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., and Huo, Y. (1994). Procedural Context and Culture: Variation in the Antecedents of Procedural Justice Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767–780.
Lipset, S. M., and Schneider, W. (1983). The Confidence Gap. New York: Free Press.
Macauley, S. (1963). Noncontractual Relations in Business. American Sociological Review, 28, 55–67.
MacCoun, R. J. (1993). Drugs and the Law: A Psychological Analysis of Drug Prohibition. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 497–512.
MacCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., Hensler, D. R., Bryant, D. L., and Ebener, P. A. (1988). Alternative Adjudication: An Evaluation of the New Jersey Automobile Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
McCarthy, T. (1978). The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McEwen, C. A., and Maiman, R. J. (1981). Small Claims Mediation in Main: An Empirical Assessment. Maine Law Review, 33, 237–268.
Miller, D. T., and Ratner, R. K. (1996). The Power of the Myth of Self-Interest. In L. Montada and M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Current Societal Concerns about Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Miller, D. T., and Ratner, R. K. (1998). The Disparity between the Actual and Assumed Power of Self-Interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53–62.
Parsons, T. (1963). On the Concept of Influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, 63–82.
Parsons, T. (1967). Some Reflections on the Place of Force in Social Process. In T. Parsons (Ed.), Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: Free Press.
Paternoster, R. (1987). The Deterrent Effect of the Perceived Certainty and Severity of Punishment: A Review of the Evidence and Issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173–217.
Paternoster, R., Saltzman, L. E., Waldo, G. P., and Chiricos, T. G. (1983). Perceived Risk and Social Control: Do Sanctions Really Deter? Law and Society Review, 17, 457–479.
Pruitt, D. G., Pierce, R. S., McGillicuddy, N. B., Welton, G. L., and Castrianno, L. M. (1993). Long-term Success in Mediation. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 313–330.
Ross, H. L. (1982). Deterring the Drinking Driver. Lexington, MA: Heath.
Rubin, J. Z. (1980). Experimental Research on Third-Party Intervention in Conflict: Toward Some Generalizations. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 379–391.
Sarat, A. (1977). Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence. Law and Society Review, 11, 427–488.
Scheingold, S. A. (1974). The Politics of Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sennett, R. (1980). Authority. New York: Vintage Books.
Shapiro, D. L., and Brett, J. M. (1993). Comparing Three Processes underlying Judgments of Procedural Justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113.
Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The Social Control of Impersonal Trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 623–658.
Singer, L. R. (1994). Settling Disputes: Conflict Resolution in Business, Families, and the Legal System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Smith, J. C. (1986). Ajase and Oedipus: Ideas of the Self in Japanese and Western Legal Consciousness. University of British Columbia Law Review, 20, 341–377.
Sugawara, I., and Huo, Y. J. (1994). Disputes in Japan: A Cross-Cultural Test of the Procedural Justice Model. Social Justice Research, 7, 129–144.
Takenishi, A., and Takenishi, M. (1992). Does Commitment Affect the Meaning of Fairness?: Commonality and Stability of Fairness Criteria in a Political Setting. Social Justice Research, 5, 415–429.
Takenishi, M., and Takenishi, A. (1990). Why Japanese Citizens Evaluate the New Indirect Tax as Unfair: Fairness Criteria and Their Relative Importance. Social Justice Research, 4, 251–264.
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1978). A Theory of Procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541–566.
Tyler, T. R. (1984). The Role of Perceived Injustice in Defendant’s Evaluations of Their Courtroom Experience. Law and Society Review, 18, 51–74.
Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions Leading to Value Expressive Effects in Judgments of Procedural Justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333–344.
Tyler, T. R. (1988). What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 301–355.
Tyler, T. R. (1989). The Psychology of Procedural Justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 333–355.
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tyler, T. R. (1993). Legitimizing Unpopular Public Policies: Does Procedure Matter? Zeitschrift fuer Rechtssoziologie, 14, 47–54.
Tyler, T. R. (1994). Governing Amid Diversity: Can Fair Decision-Making Procedures Bridge Competing Public Interests and Values? Law and Society Review, 28, 701–722.
Tyler, T. R. (1996). The psychology of disputing. In T. Tanese (Ed.), Law and Society. Kyoto, Japan: Minerva.
Tyler, T. R. (1997a). Justice and Power in Civil Dispute Processing. In A. Sarat and B. Garth (Eds.), Sociolegal Studies. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. 309–346.
Tyler, T. R. (1997b). Compliance with Intellectual Property Laws: A Psychological Perspective. Journal of International Law and Politics, 28, 101–115.
Tyler, T. R. (1997c). Citizen Discontent with Legal Procedures. American Journal of Comparative Law, 45, 869–902.
Tyler, T. R. (1997d). Procedural Fairness and Compliance with the Law. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 133, 219–240.
Tyler, T. R. (1998). Public Mistrust of the Law: A Political Perspective. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 66, 1–29.
Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why People Cooperate with Organizations: An Identity-Based Perspective. In B. Staw and R. Sutton (Eds.), Research on Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 21, 201–246.
Tyler, T. R., and Belliveau, M. (1996). Managing Workforce Diversity: Ethical Concerns and Intergroup Relations. In D. Messick and A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Behavioral Research and Business Ethnics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 171–186.
Tyler, T. R., and Bies, R. (1990). Interpersonal Aspects of Procedural Justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied Social Psychology in Business Settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 77–98.
Tyler, T. R., and Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in Groups. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Tyler, T. R., and Caine, A. (1981). The Influence of Outcomes and Procedures on Satisfaction with Formal Leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642–655.
Tyler, T. R., and Dawes, R. (1993). Fairness in Groups: Comparing the Self-Interest and Social Identity Perspectives. In B. A. Mellers and J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice. London: Cambridge University Press. 87–108.
Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in a social dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482–497.
Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in Organizational Authorities: The Influence of Motive Attributions on Willingness to Accept Decisions. In R. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 331–356.
Tyler, T. R., and Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction with Citizen-Police Encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281–292.
Tyler, T. R., and Kerstetter, W. (1994). Moral Authority in Law and Criminal Justice: Some Reflections on Wilson’s The Moral Sense. Criminal Justice Ethics, 13, 44–53.
Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational Model of Authority in Groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25). New York: Academic Press.
Tyler, T. R., and Mitchell, G. (1994). Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority. Duke Law Journal, 43, 703–815.
Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., and Smith, H. J. (1996). Understanding Why the Justice of Group Procedures Matters: A Test of the Psychological Dynamics of the Group-value Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913–930.
Tyler, T. R., and Smith, H. J. (1997). Social Justice and Social Movements. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 595–629). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., and Spodick, N. (1985). The Influence of Voice on Satisfaction with Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Process Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72–81.
Tyler, T. R., Casper, J. D., and Fisher, B. (1989). Maintaining Allegiance toward Political Authorities: The Role of Prior Attitudes and the Use of Fair Procedures. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 629–652.
Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., and Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tyler, T. R., Huo, Y. J., and Lind, E. A. (1999). The Two Psychologies of Conflict Resolution: Differing Antecedents of Pre-experience Choices and Post-experience Evaluations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 99–118.
Wagatsuma, H., and Rosett, A. (1986). The Implications of Apology: Law and Culture in Japan and the United States Law and Society Review, 20, 461–498.
Walker, L., LaTour, S., Lind, E. A., and Thibaut, J. (1974). Reactions of Participants and Observers to Modes of Adjudication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 295–310.
Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840–1920. In Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 53–111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tyler, T.R., Allan Lind, E. (2002). Procedural Justice. In: Sanders, J., Hamilton, V.L. (eds) Handbook of Justice Research in Law. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47379-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47379-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46340-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47379-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive