Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changing Our Teaching: The Role of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Elementary Science

  • Chapter
Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Part of the book series: Science & Technology Education Library ((CTISE,volume 6))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abell, S., Magnusson, S., Schmidt, J., & Smith, D. (1996). Building a pedagogical content knowledge base for elementary science reacher education. Symposium for the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. & Roth, M. (1994). Constructing science teaching in the elementary school: The socialization of a science enthusiast student teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. & Smith, D. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education. 16(4). 475–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. & Smith, E. (1983, April). Teacher behavior associated with conceptutal learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. & Smith, E. (1985). Teaching science. In V. Koehler (Ed.), The educator’s handbook: A research perspective (pp. 80–111). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L., Smith, D., & Peasley, K. (under review). Learning to teach science during the first year of teaching: Changing conceptions of teaching as the integration of learner and content learning concerns. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. & Mitchener, C. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (1990). Halves, pieces, and twoths: Constructing representational contexts in teaching fractions. (Craft Paper 90–2). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, The National Center for Research on Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. & Lundquist, S. (1993). Collaboration as a context for joining teacher learning with learning about teaching. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin. and J. Talbert, (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 13–42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., Richert, A., & Saylor, C. (1985). Content and process in biology (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Technical Report). Stanford, CA: School of Education, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, K., Christensen, P., Henriksen, S., Shank, C. & Wesley, A. 1997. Our journey with plants. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Michigan Science Teachers Association, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell. B. (1985). Students’ ideas about plant nutrition: What are they? Journal of Biology Education. 19(3), 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., Osborne, R. & Taker, R. (1985). Finding out what children think. In R. Osborne and P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in science: The implications of children’s science (pages 151–165). Portsmouth. NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendall, S., Goldberg, F., & Galili, I. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ prior knowledge about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1169–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. & Brouwer, W. (1991). Teacher awareness of student alternate conceptions about rotational motion and gravity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkheimer, G., Anderson. C., Lee, O., & Blakeslee, T. (1988). Matter and molecules. Teacher’s guide: Science book (Occasional Paper No. 121). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, The Institute for Research on Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. (1989). Implications of studies of expertise in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation. In New directions for teacher assessment, Proceedings of the 1988 Educational Testing Service Invitational Conference (pp. 39–68). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black. A. & Ammon, P. (1992). A developmental-constructivist approach to teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Book, C. & Freeman, D. (1986). Diffrerences in entry characteristics of elementary and secondary teacher candidates. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H, Eisenhart, M., Brown, C., Underhill, R.. Jones, D. & Agard, P. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily? Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. Berliner & J. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, (pp. 673–708) New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, M. & Chandler, M. 1992. Cognitive development, epistemic doubt, and identity formation in adolescence. Journal of Youth andolescence, 21, 277–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, M. (1983). The priority of knowledge and understanding in teaching (Occasional paper No 61). East Lansing. MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, W. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’ classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 471–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C.A. & Brewer, W.F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil, M. (1992, April). Prospective elementary teachers’ thinking about mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.) (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries, K. (1986). Children’s conceptions of shadow phenomena. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 1 12(4), 479–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A (Eds.) (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, K., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, K., Leach, J., Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. (1994). Research on the history and philosophy of science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 443–465). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S., Philhower, R., Sabatino, M., Smith, D., & Waterhouse, R. (1990). Taking misconceptions into account can throw new light on shadows. Powerline, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., Franke, M., Carpenter, T. & Carey, D. (1993). Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 555–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F., (1969). Concerns for teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. 1991. Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A,, Mason, C. & Matyas, M. (1989). Equity, excellence and ‘Just plain good teaching’ The American Biology Teacher, 51(2), 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, C., Sanchez-Saenz, J. Svec, M. & Gabel, D. (1994). An evaluation of preservice elementary teachers’ Science content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Anaheim, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner. D. & Gentner. D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner and A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 99–129). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E. & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28(9), 799–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher. New York: Teachers College, Columhia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (199 1). Overcoming the apprenticeship of observation in teacher education coursework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(4), 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Wilson, S., & Shulman, L. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for beginning reachers (pp. 23–36). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesne. E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien, (Eds.), 1985. Children’s ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, B. (1995). Tugboats and tennis games: Preservice conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 569–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashweh, M. (1985). An exploratory study ofteacher knowledge and teaching: The effects of Science teachers’ knowledge of subject matter and their conceptions of learning on their teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herget, D. (Ed.) (1989). The history and philosophy of science in science teaching. Proceedings of the first international conference. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2). 160–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon. R. & Anderson, C. (1987, April). Teachers’ beliefs about students’ learning processes in science: Self-reinforcing belief systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Reynolds, D. 1992. Personal history-based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in coursework: Can we practice what we teach? American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johsua. S. & Dupin, J. (1987). Taking into account student conceptions in instructional strategies: An example in physics. Cognition and instruction. 4(2), 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D., (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, E. J. (1992). Dreams. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik. J.. Layman, J., Starr, M. & Magnusson, S. (1991, April). The development of middle school teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of heat energy and temperature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O’Loughlin, M. (1988). The development scientific thinking skills. New York: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T., (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1995, April). Translation and transformation of teachers’ understanding of the nature of science into classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G. & Smith, D. A. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 241–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. 1996. Modeling in mathematies and science. James S. McDonnell Foundation’s Cognitive Studies in Educational Practice Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke. J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). Challenging prospective teachers’ beliefs during early field experience: A quixotic undertaking? Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid, G. W. (in press). The arts and sciences as preparation for teaching. In K. Howey & N. Zympher (Eds.), Faculty development for improving teacher preparation. Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn’t really work: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 193–205). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, H. & Bull, B. (1991). The pedagogic nature of subject matter knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 316–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcichtry, Y. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichtry. Y. (1993). The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 429–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan Essential Goals and Objectives for Science Education (1991). Lansing, MI: Michigan State Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, C. & Taylor, P. (1995). Metaphors as global markers for teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science. Research in Science Education, 25(I), 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, D., Smith, D. & Johnson, V. (1990). Implementing conceptual change teaching in primary science. The Elementary School Journal, 91(2), 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordhoff, K., (1993). Teaching U.S. history to Alaska Native students: Knowledge and beliefs of prospective secondary teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. (1993). Learning science concepts through material and social activities: Conversational analysis meets conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1930). The child’s conception of physical causality. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams. Piaget, J. (1980). Experiments in contradiction. (D. Coltman, Trans.) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the natureof science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education. 7(3), 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raizen, S. & Michelson, A (1993). The future of science in elementary schools: Educating prospective teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raths, J. (no date) Three elements of pedagogical content knowledge. Unpublished paper. University of Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), The Handbook of Researchon Teacher Education (2nd edition, pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (1983). Analyzing arguments in science classroom discourse: Can teachers’ questions distort scientific authority? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, J. & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1968). The nature of Science and science teaching. Helmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosebery, CA., Warren, B., & Conant, F. (1990). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Bolt, Beranek and Newman, lnc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. (1987). The power plant: Teacher’s guide to photosynthesis. (Occaional Paper No. 112). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, The Institute for Research on Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K., Smith, E., & Anderson, C. (1983, April). Students’ conceptions of photosynthesis and food for plants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 919–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering modelto a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859–2382

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. & Buchmann, M. (1983). Six teachers’ beliefs and attitudes and their curriculum time allocations. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneps, M. (1989). A private universe. Santa Monica, CA: Pyramid Film and Video.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. (1978). Science, curriculum, and liberal education (selected essays). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. (1994). What children bring to light: A constructivist perspective on children’s learning in science. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. & Brobeck, S. (1993). Changing views of mathematics learning: A case study of a prospective elementary teacher. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-NA), Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. & Schifter, D. (1991). Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R., Koballa, T., & Oliver, J. (1994). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 211–234). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1987, April). Primary teachers’ substantive, syntactic, and pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., (1989). The role of teacher knowledge in teaching conceptual change science lessons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, DE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1992, April). The Curriculum Development Lab: A vehicle for staff development in primary science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1993, April). Dilemmas and decisions in using conceptual change theory in the classrootti. Video presentation at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Levine-Rose, S., & Conway, P. (1995, April). The reconstruction of preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. & Neale, D. (1987, April). The construction of Subject matter knowledge in primary science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. & Neale, D. (1991). The construction of subject-matter knowledge in primary science teaching. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 2, pages 187–243). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith D. & Neale, D. (1992, April). On the road to expertise: Changes in primary teachers’ sublect matter knowledge for teaching science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., Blakeslee, T. & Anderson, C. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. and Sendelbach, N. (1982). The program, the plans and the activities of the classroom: The demands of activity-based science. In J. Olson (Ed.), Innovation in the science curriculum: Classroom knowledge and curriculum change. London: Croom-Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith. J. (1994). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Unpuhlished manuscript. Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songer, N. & Linn, M. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration’? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stofflet, R. & Stoddardt, T. (1994). The ability to understand and use conceptual change pedagogy as a function of prior content learning experience. Journal of Research in Science Tenching, 31(1). 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. (1993). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge about children’s minds arid learning: Implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, E;. (1990). Changing metaphors arid beliefs: A master switch for teaching? Theory into Practice, 29(2), 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. & Garnett, P. (1988). Exemplary practice in science classrooms. Science Education, 72(2), 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, E;.. Tippins, D. & Gallard, A. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of researchon science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varelas, M. (1996). Between theory and data in a seventh-grade science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 33(3), 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J. & Novak, J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. & Bentley, D. (1994). Humanizing and feminizing science: Reviving anthropomorphic and animistic thinking in constructivist science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. (1987, April). How well prepared are science and mathematics teachers? Results of the I985 National survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (1993). Thinker tools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. & Gunstone. R. (1992). Probing understanding. New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox. S., Lanier, P., Schram, P., & Lappan, G. (1992). Influencing beginning teachers’ practice in mathematics education: Confronting constraints of knowledge, beliefs and context. (Research Report 92-1). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, The Center for Research on Teacher Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembal, C., Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Palinesar, A. (1995, April). Preservice elementary teachers’ developing understanding of how to select, represent, and teach content. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Deborah C. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

    Julie Gess-Newsome

  2. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

    Norman G. Lederman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, D.C. (1999). Changing Our Teaching: The Role of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Elementary Science. In: Gess-Newsome, J., Lederman, N.G. (eds) Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5903-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47217-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation