Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy, New York Oxford
Bell, R., Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1997). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of science: The reality of teacher preparation, paper presented at the AETS international meeting, Cincinnati, OH, January 9–12.
Clough, M.P. (1994). ‘Diminish students’ resistance to evolution education’, The American Biology Teacher (56), 409–415.
Clough, M.P. (1995). ‘Longitudinal Understanding of the Nature of Science as Facilitated by an Introductory High School Biology Course’, Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy, and science Teaching Conference, pp. 212–221, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Clough, M.P. (1997). Strategies and activities for initiating and maintaining pressure on students’ naive nviews concerning the nature of science, Interchange, 28(1–2), 191–204.
Clough, M.P. and Clark, R. L. (1994a). ‘Cookbooks and constructivism: A better approach to laboratory activities’, The Science Teacher, (61), 34–37.
Clough, M.P. and Clark, R. L. (1994b). ‘Creative constructivism: challenge your students with an authentic science experience’, The Science Teacher, (61),46–49.
Crichton, M. (1990). Jurassic park, New York, Ballantine.
Frank, L.A. (1990). The big splash, New York, Birch Lane.
Gibbs, A and Lawson, AE. (1992). The nature of scientific thinking as reflected by the works of biologists and by biology textbooks, The American Biology Teacher, (54),137–151.
Goodlad, J. J. (1983). ‘A study of schooling: some findings and hypotheses’, Phi Delta Kappan, (64), 465–470.
Hoffmann, R. (1993). ‘For the first time, you can see atoms’, American Scientist, January–February, 11–12.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University.
Lederman, N.G. (1992). ‘Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (29), 331–359.
Matthews, M. R. (1989). ‘A role for history and philosophy in science teaching’, Interchange, (20), 3–15.
Medawar, P.B. (1963). ‘Is the scientific paper a fraud?’, in Medawar, P.B. (1990), The threat and the glory: reflections on science and scientists, New York, HarperCollins
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards, Washington, D. C., National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association (1982). Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980’s, an NSTA Position Statement, Washington, D.C.
Stent, G. S. (Ed.) (1980). The double helix: text, commentary, reviews, and original papers, New York, Norton.
Trefil, James (1990). ‘Seeing atoms’, Discover, June, pp. 55–60.
Zeidler, D.L. and Lederman, N.G. (1987). The Effect of Teachers’ Language on Students’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science, paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting for the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington, D.C., ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED286734.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1988). ‘An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25,607–629.
Aikenhead, G. S. and Ryan, AG. (1992). ‘The development of a new instrument: “Views on science-technology-society” (VOSTS)’, Science Education, (76), 477–491.
Bednarek, D. I. (1993). ‘Friction: heat-loving bacterium roils two worlds. Business, academia spar when product of basic research proves practical’, The Milwaukee Journal, May 9.
Begley, S. (1992). ‘Math has on its face: The foundations of mathematics have serious flaws. And that may imperil all the sciences’, Newsweek, November 30.
Bridgman, P. W. (1960). ‘Explanation’, in The Logic of Modern Physics, pp. 37–39. New York, Macmillan.
Campbell, N.A. (1993). ‘A conversation with ⋯ David Suzuki’, The American Biology Teacher, (55), 31–36.
Campbell, N.A. (1992). ‘A conversation with ⋯ Michael Bishop & Harold Varmus’, The American Biology Teacher, (54),476–481.
Einstein, A. and Leopold, I. (1938). The evolution of physics, New York, Simon and Schuster.
Elmer-Dewitt, P. (1994). ‘Don’t Tread on my Lab, Time, (143), 44–45.
Feynman, R. P. (1985). ‘The value of science’, in What do you care what other people think? New York, Norton.
Johnson, R. L. and Peeples, E.E. (1987). ‘The role of scientific understanding in college: Student acceptance of evolution’, The American Biology Teacher, (49), 93–96.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts, New Jersey, Princeton.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York, Routledge.
Medawar, P. B. (1973a). ‘The cost-benefit analysis of pure research’, in Medawar, P.B. (1990), The Threat and the Glory: Reflections on Science and Scientists, New York, Harper Collins.
Medawar, P. B. (1973b). ‘The pure science’, in Medawar, P.B. (1990), The Threat and the Glory: Reflections on Science and Scientists, New York, Harper Collins.
Moore, J. A (1983). ‘Evolution, education, and the nature of science and scientific inquiry’, in Zettderg, J. Peter (ed.), Evolution versus Creationism: The Public Education Controversy, Phoenix AZ, Oryx Press.
Munby, H. (1976). ‘Some implications oflanguage in science education’, Science Education, (60), 115–124. National Institutes of Health (1984). Why do basic research? NIH Publication Number 84-660. Bethesda, Maryland.
Overbye, D. (1993, April 26). Who’s afraid of the big bad bang? Time.
Ryan, A G. and Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). ‘Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science’ Science Education. (76),559–580.
Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy, New Brunswick, Rutgers.
Thomas, L. (1983). Late night thoughts on listening to Mahler’s Ninth Symphony, New York, Viking Press.
Van Allen, J. A (1964, February 3–7). ‘Science as a human enterprise’, Current Science.
Westfall, R. S. (1977). The construction of modern science, New York, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clough, M.P. (1998). Integrating the Nature of Science with Student Teaching: Rationale and Strategies. In: McComas, W.F. (eds) The Nature of Science in Science Education. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47215-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47215-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5080-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47215-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive