Advertisement

Cryocoolers 11 pp 353-362 | Cite as

Shuttle Loss in Pulse Tubes

  • L. W. Yang
Chapter

Abstract

Pulse tube refrigerators have the unique feature of a hollow tube replacing the cold piston. This paper analyzes some losses resulting from this hollow tube due to the oscillating flow; the losses are quite similar to the shuttle loss and pumping loss in a Stirling or G-M refrigerator. The analysis starts with surface heat pumping in a basic-type pulse tube cooler. Then, flow features and the origin of losses are further explained. As an important parameter, boundary layer thickness is predicted. The analysis shows that, due to the large temperature difference, the distribution of boundary layer thickness along the pulse tube changes greatly. For different boundary layer thicknesses, shuttle losses and pumping losses differ significantly. With the predicted boundary layer thickness, the amplitude of the shuttle loss and pumping loss are just the opposite of what they are in a traditional Stirling or G-M cooler. Pumping gas loss becomes an important loss in the pulse tube refrigerator.

Keywords

Heat Transfer Boundary Layer Thickness Heat Transfer Area Pulse Tube Pulse Tube Refrigerator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Bian, S.X., Small-type Cryocooler, China Mechanical Industry Press, Beijing (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mikulin, E.I., Tarasov, A.A., Shkrebyonock, M.P., “Low-temperature expansion pulse tubes,” Adv. in Cryo. Eng., vol.29, Plenum Press, New York (1984), p. 629.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shiraishi, M., Nakamura, N., Seo, K., Murakami, M., “Visualization study of velocity profiles and displacements of working gas inside a pulse tube refrigerator,” Cryocoolers 9, Plenum Press, New York (1997), pp. 355–364.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, J.M., Kittel, P., Timmerhause, K.D., Radebaugh, R., “Higher Order Pulse Tube Modeling,” Cryocoolers 9, Plenum Press, New York (1997), pp. 345–353.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, L.W., Zhou Y., Liang, J.T., “Analysis of theory refrigeration and losses in pulse tube,” Adv. in Cryo. Eng., vol. 45, Plenum Press, New York (2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hiratsuka, Y., Kang, Y.M., Matsubara, Y., “Development of a 1 to 5W at 80K Stirling pulse tube cryocooler”, Cryocoolers 10, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers (1999), pp.149–155.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gifford, W. E., Longsworth, R.C., “Pulse tube refrigeration”, Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Ind., vol. 63 (1964), p.264.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu, S.W., Wu, P.Y., Chen, Z.Q., “Double-inlet pulse tube refrigerators: an important improvement,” Cryogenics, vol. 30 (1990), p.514.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, L.W., Research of pulse tube refrigeration mechanism and practical development, Post-doctor Report, Institute of Mechanics, Beijing (1998), China.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. W. Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Applied PhysicsJustus-Liebig-University GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations